Monro A: Part of the cartilage of the joint, separated and ossified. .Edinburgh, Ruddimans 4::19. ,1738. .
Tol JL, Struijs PA, Bossuyt PM, et al: Treatment strategies in osteochondral defects of the talar dome: a systematic review. .Foot Ankle Int 21::119. ,2000. .
Bruns J, Rosenbach B: Osteochondrosis dissecans of the talus: comparison of results of surgical treatment in adolescents and adults. .Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 112::23. ,1992. .
Kong F: Ueber freie Koper in den Glenken. .Deutsch Z Chir 27::90. ,1888. .
Berndt AL, Hardy M: Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. .J Bone Joint Surg Am 41::988. ,1959. .
Flick AB, Gould N: Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus (transchondral fractures of the talus): review of literature and new surgical approach for medial dome lesions. .Foot Ankle 5::165. ,1985. .
Giannini S, Vannini F: Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: current concepts review. .Foot Ankle Int 25::168. ,2004. .
Navid DO, Myerson MS: Approach alternatives for treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. .Foot Ankle Clin 7::635. ,2002. .
Santrock RD, Buchanan MM, Lee TH, et al: Osteochondral lesions of the talus. .Foot Ankle Clin 8::73. ,2003. .
Schachter AK, Chen AL, Reddy PD, et al: Osteochondral lesions of the talus. .J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13::152. ,2005. .
Convery FR, Myers MH, Akeson WH: Fresh osteochondral allografting of the femoral condyle. .Clin Orthop Relat Res 273::139. ,1991. .
Tasto JP, Ostrander R, Bugbee W, et al: The diagnosis and management of osteochondral lesions of the talus: osteochondral allograft update. .Arthroscopy 10: (suppl 1):138. ,2003. .
Buckwalter JA: Articular cartilage injuries. .Clin Orthop Relat Res 402::21. ,2002. .
Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ: Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. .Instr Course Lect 47::487. ,1998. .
Shao X, Goh JC, Hutmacher DW, et al: Repair of large articular osteochondral defects using hybrid scaffolds and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in a rabbit model. .Tissue Eng 12::1539. ,2006. .
Al-Shaikh RA, Chou LB, Mann JA, et al: Autologous osteochondral grafting for talar cartilage defects. .Foot Ankle Int 23::381. ,2002. .
Angermann P, Jensen P: Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: long-term results of surgical treatment. .Foot Ankle 10::161. ,1989. .
Assenmacher JA, Kelikian AS, Gottiob C, et al: Arthroscopically assisted autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: an MRI and clinical follow-up study. .Foot Ankle Int 22::544. ,2001. .
Bryant DD III, Siegel MG: Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: a new technique for arthroscopic drilling. .Arthroscopy 9::238. ,1993. .
Choung D, Christensen JC: Mosaicplasty of the talus: a joint contact analysis in a cadaver model. .J Foot Ankle Surg 41::65. ,2002. .
Draper SD, Fallat LM: Autogenous bone grafting for the treatment of talar dome lesions. .J Foot Ankle Surg 39::15. ,2000. .
Gautier E, Kolker D, Jakob RP: Treatment of cartilage defects of the talus by autologous osteochondral grafts. .J Bone Joint Surg Br 84::237. ,2002. .
Giannini S, Buda R, Grigolo B, et al: Autologous chondrocyte transplantation in osteochondral lesions of the ankle joint. .Foot Ankle Int 22::513. ,2001. .
Giannini S, Vannini F, Buda R: Osteoarticular grafts in the treatment of OCD of the talus: mosaicplasty versus autologous chondrocyte transplantation. .Foot Ankle Clin 7::621. ,2002. .
Gross AE, Agnidis Z, Hutchison CR: Osteochondral defects of the talus treated with fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation. .Foot Ankle Int 22::385. ,2001. .
Hangody L, Kish G, Modis L, et al: Mosaicplasty for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: two to seven year results in 36 patients. .Foot Ankle Int 22::552. ,2001. .
Kumai T, Takakura Y, Higashiyama I, et al: Arthroscopic drilling for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. .J Bone Joint Surg Am 81::1229. ,1999. .
Meehan R, McFarlin S, Bugbee W, et al: Fresh ankle osteochondral allograft transplantation for tibiotalar joint arthritis. .Foot Ankle Int 26::793. ,2005. .
Schuman L, Struijs PA, van Dijk CN: Arthroscopic treatment for osteochondral defects of the talus: results at follow-up at 2 to 11 years. .J Bone Joint Surg Br 84::364. ,2002. .
Tontz WL Jr, Bugbee WD, Brage ME: Use of allografts in the management of ankle arthritis. .Foot Ankle Clin 8::361. ,2003. .
Bugbee WD: Fresh osteochondral allografts. .J Knee Surg 15::191. ,2002. .
McAllister DR, Joyce MJ, Mann BJ, et al: Allograft update: the current status of tissue regulations, procurement, processing, and sterilization. .Am J Sports Med 35::2148. ,2007. .
Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J: Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. .Foot Ankle Int 22::788. ,2001. .
Irwin TA, Kou JX, Fortin PT: Classification and treatment of severe ankle articular segment deficits: osteochondral allograft reconstruction. .Foot Ankle Clin 12::41. ,2007. .
Emmerson BC, Gortz S, Jamali AA, et al: Fresh osteochondral allografting in the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the femoral condyle. .Am J Sports Med 35::907. ,2007. .
Garrett JC: Fresh osteochondral allografts for treatment of articular defects in osteochondritis dissecans of the lateral femoral condyle in adults. .Clin Orthop Relat Res 303::33. ,1994. .
Ghazavi MT, Pritzker RP, Davis AM, et al: Fresh osteochondral allografts for post-traumatic osteochondral defects of the knee. .J Bone Joint Surg Br 79::1008. ,1997. .
Ambrose CG, Clanton TO: Bioabsorbable implants: review of clinical experience in orthopedic surgery. .Ann Biomed Eng 32::171. ,2004. .
Background: Management of osteochondral defects of the talus remains a challenge, and many lesions do not respond to traditional treatments. The use of fresh allografts is a promising alternative.
Methods: A freehand inlay surgical technique for reconstructing osteochondral defects of the talus with fresh osteochondral allografts fixated with bioresorbable chondral darts is described. A retrospective review of a consecutive series of 15 patients (eight males and seven females; mean age, 42.2 years) with stage IV osteochondral defects who underwent this procedure is presented. Seven patients reported a history of trauma. The mean lesion diameter was 1.7 cm.
Results: Mean follow-up was 1.6 years. The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score subscale mean scores obtained at the most recent follow-up were as follows: 66.0 (pain), 64.8 (other symptoms), 71.2 (activities of daily living), 50.7 (sport and recreation function), and 42.1 (quality of life). Nine lesions had no evidence of lucency, and six demonstrated mild lucency, indicating that no allograft had been absorbed. Most patients exhibited no step-off deformity or arthrosis. No graft-related complications occurred. No subsequent surgical procedures were required.
Conclusions: Early results suggest that this technique is a viable option for treating large osteochondral defects of the talus, as evidenced by the favorable patient assessment and radiographic outcomes and the lack of postoperative complications and subsequent procedures. Unlike previous allograft techniques, hardware complications did not occur. Based on these results, this technique will continue to be used. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 100(1): 25–34, 2010)