Leppilahti J, Orava S: Total Achilles tendon rupture: a review. .Sports Med 25::79. ,1998. .
Leppilahti J, Puranen J, Orava S: Incidence of Achilles tendon rupture. .Acta Ortbop Scand 67::277. ,1996. .
Jozsa L, Kvist M, Balint BJ, et al: The role of recreational sport activity in Achilles tendon ruptures: a clinical pathoanatomical, and sociological study of 292 cases. .Am J Sports Med 17::338. ,1989. .
Tumilty S: Achilles tendon rupture: rising incidence in New Zealand follows international trends. .Phys Ther Rev 12::59. ,2007. .
Maffulli N, Wong J, Almekinders LC: Types and epidemiology of tendinopathy. .Clin Sports Med 22::675. ,2003. .
Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Siddiqui F, et al: Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic overview and metaanalysis. .Clin Orthop Relat Res 400::190. ,2002. .
Cetti R, Christensen SE, Ejsted R, et al: Operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture: a prospective randomized study and review of the literature. .Am J Sports Med 21::791. ,1993. .
Lo IK, Kirkley A, Nonweiler B, et al: Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a quantitative review. .Clin J Sport Med 7::207. ,1997. .
Lynch R: Achilles tendon rupture: surgical versus non-surgical treatment. .Accid Emerg Nurs 12::149. ,2004. .
Möller M, Moven T, Granhed H, et al: Acute rupture of tendon Achillis: a prospective randomised study of comparison between surgical and non-surgical treatment. .J Bone Joint Surg Br 83::843. ,2001. .
Khan RJ, Fick D, Keogh A, et al: Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. .J Bone Joint Surg Am 87::2202. ,2005. .
Webb JM, Bannister GC: Percutaneous repair of the ruptured tendo Achillis. .J Bone Joint Surg Br 81::877. ,1999. .
Gigante A, Moschini A, Verdenelli A, et al: Open versus percutaneous repair in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a randomized prospective study. .Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16::204. ,2008. .
Lim J, Dalal R, Waseem M: Percutaneous vs. open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon: a prospective randomized controlled study. .Foot Ankle Int 22::559. ,2001. .
Schroeder D, Lehmann M, Steinbrueck K: Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: open vs. percutaneous repair vs. conservative treatment: a prospective randomized study. .Orthop Trans 21::1228. ,1997. .
Kitaoka HB, Alexander IA, Adelaar RS, et al: Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. .Foot Ankle Int 15::349. ,1994. .
Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL: Analysis of clinical grading scales for the foot and ankle. .Foot Ankle Int 18::443. ,1997. .
Leppilahti J, Forsman K, Puranen J, et al: Outcome and prognostic factors of achilles rupture repair using a new scoring method. .Clin Orthop Relat Res 346::152. ,1998. .
Kannus P: Isokinetic evaluation of muscular performance: implications for muscle testing and rehabilitation. .Int J Sports Med 15::11. ,1994. .
Leppilahti J, Siira P, Vanharanta H, et al: Isokinetic evaluation of calf muscle performance after Achilles rupture repair. .Int J Sports Med 17::619. ,1996. .
Cretnik A, Kosanovic M, Smrkolj V: Percutaneous versus open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon: a comparative study. .Am J Sports Med 33::1369. ,2005. .
Maes R, Copin G, Averous C: Is percutaneous repair of the Achilles tendon a safe technique? A study of 124 cases. .Acta Ortbop Belg 72::179. ,2006. .
Metz R, Verleisdonk E, van-der Heijden GJ, et al: Acute Achilles tendon rupture: minimally invasive surgery versus non-operative treatment with immediate full weightbearing: a randomized clinical trial. .Am J Sports Med 36::1688. ,2008. .
Majewski M, Rohrbach M, Czaja S, et al: Avoiding sural nerve injuries during percutaneous Achilles tendon repair. .Am J Sports Med 34::793. ,2006. .
Möller M, Lind K, Movin T, et al: Calf muscle function after Achilles tendon rupture: a prospective, randomised study comparing surgical and non-surgical treatment. .Scand J Med Sci Sports 12::9. ,2002. .
Goren D, Ayalon M, Nyska M: Isokinetic strength and endurance after percutaneous and open surgical repair of Achilles tendon ruptures. .Foot Ankle Int 26::286. ,2005. .
Background: Treatment modalities for acute Achilles tendon rupture can be divided into operative and nonoperative. The main concern with nonoperative treatment is the high incidence of repeated ruptures; operative treatment is associated with risk of infection, sural nerve injury, and wound-healing sequelae. We assessed our experience with a percutaneous operative approach for treating acute Achilles tendon rupture.
Methods: The outcomes of percutaneous surgery in 29 patients (25 men; age range, 24–58 years) who underwent percutaneous surgery for Achilles tendon rupture between 1997 and 2004 were retrospectively evaluated. Their demographic data, subjective and objective evaluation findings, and isokinetic evaluation results were retrieved, and they were assessed with the modified Boyden score and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale.
Results: All 29 patients demonstrated good functional outcome, with no- to mild-limitations in recreational activities and high patient satisfaction. Mean follow-up was 31.8 months. Changes in ankle range of motion in the operated leg were minimal. Strength and power testing revealed a significant difference at 90°/sec for plantarflexion power between the injured and healthy legs but no difference at 30° and 240°/sec or in dorsiflexion. The mean modified Boyden score was 74.3, and the mean Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score was 94.5.
Conclusions: Percutaneous surgery for Achilles tendon rupture is easily executed and has excellent functional results and low complication rates. It is an appealing alternative to either nonoperative or open surgery treatments. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 100(4): 270–275, 2010)