Giunti A, Moroni A, Olmi R, et al: Does the importance of the angle of anteversion contribute to osteoarthrosis? a preliminary report. .Clin Orthop 145::213. ,1979. .
Fulkerson FP, Hungerford D: Disorder of the Patellofemoral Joint, 2nd Ed, p 15, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore. ,1990. .
Molina A, Álvarez P, Tey M, et al: “Repercusión Biomecánica y Fisiopatológica del Morfotipo Torsional: Repercusión de las Anomalías Torsionales en la Rodilla,” in Desalineaciones Torsionales de las Extremidades Inferiores: Implicaciones Clinicopatológicas: Monografías SECOT 2, ed by J Ballester, p 29, Ed Masson SA, Barcelona. ,2001. .
Ballester J: Operative treatment for recurrent dislocation of the patella. .Reconstr Surg Traumatol 12::46. ,1971. .
Cebamanos J, Molina A, Pelfort X, et al: “Repercusión Biomecánica y Fisiopatológica del Morfotipo Torsional: Repercusión de las Anomalías Torsionales en el Pie,” in Desalineaciones Torsionales de las Extremidades Inferiores: Implicaciones Clinicopatológicas: Monografías SECOT 2, ed by J Ballester, p 54, Ed Masson SA, Barcelona. ,2001. .
Rosselli P, Medina A: La verdadera utilidad del “calzado correctivo” en niños. .Rev Colomb Ortop Trauma 15::1. ,2005. .
McPoil TG, Cornwall MW: The effect of foot orthoses on transverse tibial rotation during walking. .JAPMA 90::2. ,2000. .
Michaud TC: Foot Orthoses and Other Forms of Conservative Foot Care, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore. ,1996. .
Redmond AC: The effectiveness of gait plates in controlling in-toeing symptoms in young children. .JAPMA 90::70. ,2000. .
Shuster RO: A device to influence the angle of gait. .JAPA 57::269. ,1967. .
Lafuente G, Dominguez G, Munuera PV, et al: Patrón rotador de la extremidad inferior: concepto, valores normales, y relación con el ángulo de la marcha y con la movilidad del primer dedo. .Rev Esp Podol 16::6. ,2005. .
Viladot A: Patología del Antepie, 4th Ed, Springer-Verlag Ibérica, Barcelona. ,2001. .
Benhamu S, Gonzalez R, Martinez L, et al: Protocolo de toma de moldes en espuma fenólica: maniobras aplicativas sobre el pie. .Rev Esp Podol 15::184. ,2004. .
Morton DJ: The angle of gait: a study based upon examination of the feet of central African natives. .J Bone Joint Surg Am 14::741. ,1932. .
Murray MP, Drought AB, Kory RC: Walking patterns of normal men. .J Bone Joint Surg Am 46::335. ,1964. .
Murray MP, Kory RC, Sepic SB: Walking patterns of normal women. .Arch Phys Med Rehabil 51::637. ,1970. .
Seber S, Hazer B, Kose N, et al: Rotational profile of the lower extremity and foot progression angle: computerized tomographic examination of 50 male adults. .Arch Orthop Traum Surg 120::255. ,2000. .
Background: Orthotic devices are used to help children progressively acquire a more physiologic walking pattern.
Methods: To determine the effect of an orthotic device with an out-toeing wedge along with a physiologic shoe as treatment for in-toed gait, angle of gait was measured in 48 children aged 3 to 14 years with in-toed gait. The following comparisons were made: angle of gait in children unshod versus children shod without treatment, angle of gait in children shod without treatment versus children shod plus orthoses, and angle of gait in children unshod versus children shod plus orthoses.
Results: Using a correctly fitting shoe increased the angle of gait in a nonsignificant manner, but a significant increase was revealed in the comparison of the angle of gait in children unshod versus children under treatment. The results showed that the behavior in boys and girls was similar to that in the total sample. Regarding side, the corrective effect of the orthotic device was similar in the two feet. However, the data showed a greater corrective effect of the shoe in the right foot.
Conclusions: Orthotic devices with out-toeing wedge combined with correctly fitting shoes, as well as shoes alone, are useful tools in the treatment of in-toed gait in children. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 100(6): 472–478, 2010)