• 1.

    Choi, BC, AW Pak, and JC Choi. :Daily step goal of 10,000 steps: a literature review. .Clin Invest Med 30::E146. ,2007. .

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Tudor-Locke, C and DR Bassett Jr. :How many steps/day are enough? preliminary pedometer indices for public health. .Sports Med 34::1. ,2004. .

  • 3.

    Needleman, RL . :A surgical approach for flexible flatfeet in adults including a subtalar arthroereisis with the MBA sinus tarsi implant. .Foot Ankle Int 27::9. ,2006. .

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Tomaro, JE, RG Burdett, and AM Chadran. :Subtalar joint motion and the relationship to lower extremity overuse injuries. .JAPMA 86::427. ,1996. .

  • 5.

    DeLeo, AT, TA Dierks, R Ferber, et al. :Lower extremity joint coupling during running: a current update. .Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 19::983. ,2004. .

  • 6.

    Christensen, JC, N Campbell, and K DiNucci. :Closed kinetic chain tarsal mechanics of subtalar joint arthroereisis. .JAPMA 86::467. ,1996. .

  • 7.

    Inman, VT . :The influence of the foot-ankle complex on the proximal skeletal structures. .Artif Limbs 13::59. ,1969. .

  • 8.

    Husain, ZS and LM Fallat. :Biomechanical analysis of Maxwell-Brancheau arthroereisis implants. .J Foot Ankle Surg 41::352. ,2002. .

  • 9.

    Close, JR, VT Inman, PM Poor, et al. :The function of the subtalar joint. .Clin Orthop Relat Res 50::159. ,1967. .

  • 10.

    Kirby, KA . :Biomechanics of the normal and abnormal foot. .JAPMA 90::30. ,2000. .

  • 11.

    Wagner, UA, BJ Sangeorzan, RM Harrington, et al. :Contact characteristics of the subtalar joint: load distribution between the anterior and posterior facets. .J Orthop Res 10::535. ,1992. .

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Harris, RI and T Beath. :Hypermobile flat-foot with short tendo-Achillis. .J Bone Joint Surg Am 30A::134. ,1948. .

  • 13.

    LeLievre, J . :Current concepts and correction in the valgus foot. .Clin Orthop Relat Res 70::43. ,1970. .

  • 14.

    Subotnick, SI . :The subtalar joint lateral extra-articular arthroereisis: a preliminary report. .JAPA 64::701. ,1974. .

  • 15.

    Smith, SD and EA Millar. :Arthrorisis by means of a subtalar polyethylene peg implant for correction of hindfoot pronation in children. .Clin Orthop Relat Res 181::15. ,1983. .

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Giannini, S, M Girolami, and F Ceccarelli. :The surgical treatment of infantile flat foot: a new expanding endo-orthotic implant. .Ital J Orthop Traumatol 11::315. ,1985. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Needleman, RL . :Current topic review: subtalar arthroereisis for the correction of flexible flatfoot. .Foot Ankle Int 26::336. ,2005. .

  • 18.

    Dockery, GL and ME Crawford. :The Maxwell-Brancheau arthroereisis (MBA) implant in pediatric and adult flexible flatfoot conditions. .Foot Ankle Q 12::107. ,2009. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Yamaguchi, S, T Sasho, H Kato, et al. :Ankle and subtalar kinematics during dorsiflexion: plantarflexion activities. .Foot Ankle Int 30::361. ,2009. .

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Huson, A . :Biomechanics of the tarsal mechanism: a key to the function of the normal human foot. .JAPMA 90::12. ,2000. .

  • 21.

    Kirby, KA . :Rotational equilibrium across the subtalar joint axis. .JAPMA 79::1. ,1989. .

  • 22.

    Farabeuf, LH . :Precis de Manuel Operatoire. ,G. Masson. ,Paris. ,1890. .

  • 23.

    Wang, CL, CK Cheng, CW Chen, et al. :Contact areas and pressure distributions in the subtalar joint. .J Biomech 28::269. ,1995. .

  • 24.

    Morton, DJ . :Mechanism of the normal foot and of flat foot. .J Bone Joint Surgery Am 6::386. ,1924. .

Stabilization of Joint Forces of the Subtalar Complex via HyProCure Sinus Tarsi Stent

Michael E. Graham Graham International Implant Institute, Macomb, MI.

Search for other papers by Michael E. Graham in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DPM
,
Rachit Parikh Graham International Implant Institute, Macomb, MI.

Search for other papers by Rachit Parikh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Vijay Goel University of Toledo, Toledo, OH.

Search for other papers by Vijay Goel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Devdatt Mhatre University of Toledo, Toledo, OH.

Search for other papers by Devdatt Mhatre in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
, and
Aaron Matyas University of Toledo, Toledo, OH.

Search for other papers by Aaron Matyas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS

Background:

The foot is the foundation of the body. The stability of the osseous hindfoot structure is crucial in bipedal locomotion. The subtalar joint is responsible for conversion of the rotatory forces of the lower extremities and dictates the movements of the midtarsal joints and the forefoot. In a hyperpronated foot, excessive abnormal pronation results in partial to full obliteration of the sinus tarsi. The hypothesis is that the HyProCure device will prevent obliteration of the sinus tarsi, thereby stabilizing the subtalar joint complex and eliminating the excessive forces to the proximal and distal musculoskeletal system that occur with every step.

Methods:

Five fresh-frozen human foot cadaver specimens that represented pathologic hindfoot and midfoot instability and partial to full obliteration of the sinus tarsi were axially compressed to 2,000 N and internally rotated by 15° to produce maximum pronation of the subtalar joint using a biaxial materials testing machine. The forces were measured across the posterior and anterior talocalcaneal joint facets before and after placement of the HyProCure stent.

Results:

The subtalar joint stabilized after placement of the HyProCure sinus tarsi stent. The mean ± 1 SD forces in the posterior talocalcaneal joint increased from 795.88 ± 106 N to 1,004.86 ± 72.41 N (P < 0.05, two-tailed paired t test). The mean ± SD forces at the anterior talocalcaneal joint decreased from 520.15 ± 127.18 N to 394.56 ± 73.83 N (P < 0.05), shifting the contact area posteriorly.

Conclusions:

Placement of the HyProCure subtalar stabilization stent in a hyperpronated foot prevents excessive talar subluxation and assists in proper distribution of the axial loads on the subtalar facet joints. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 101(5): 390–399, 2011)

Corresponding author: Michael E. Graham, DPM, FACFAS, Graham International Implant Institute, 16137 Leone Dr, Macomb, MI 48042. (E-mail: mgraham@grahamiii.com)
Save