Franklin, ME and TConner-Kerr. :An analysis of posture and back pain in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy. .J Orthop Sports Phys Ther28::133. ,1998. .974246910.2519/jospt.19126.96.36.199)| false
Paul, JA, HSalle, and MHFrings-Dresen. :Effect of posture on hip joint moment during pregnancy, while performing a standing task. .Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)11::111. ,1996. .10.1016/0268-0033(95)00049-6)| false
Bus, SA and Ade Lange. :A comparison of the 1-step, 2-step and 3-step protocols for obtaining barefoot plantar pressure data in the diabetic neuropathic foot. .Clin Biomech20::892. ,2005. .10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.05.004)| false
Gurney, JK, UGKersting, and DRosenbaum. :Between-day reliability of repeated plantar pressure distribution measurements in a normal population. .Gait Posture27::706. ,2008. .10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.002)| false
Macellari, V, CGiacomozzi, and RSaggini. :Spatial-temporal parameters of gait: reference data and a statistical method for normality assessment. .Gait Posture10::171. ,1999. .10.1016/S0966-6362(99)00021-1)| false
Cavanagh, PR and JSUlbrecht. :“Biomechanical Aspects of Foot Problems in Diabetes,”. inThe Foot in Diabetes, ,2nd Ed. , ed byBoulton, AJM, HConnor, and PRCavanagh. , p25. ,John Wiley & Sons Ltd. ,Chichester, UK. ,1994. .
Sacco, ICN, ANHamamoto, AAGomes, et al. :Role of ankle mobility in foot rollover during gait in individuals with diabetics neuropathy. .Clin Biomech24::687. ,2009. .10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.05.003)| false
Cogswell, ME, MKSerdula, DWHungerford, et al. :Gestational weight gain among average-weight and overweight women: what is excessive?Am J Obstet Gynecol172 ( pt 1:):705. ,1995. .785671110.1016/0002-9378(95)90598-7)| false
The intention of this investigation was to longitudinally describe and compare the plantar pressure distribution in orthostatic posture and gait throughout pregnancy.
A prospective longitudinal observational study was conducted with six pregnant women (mean ± SD age, 32 ± 3 years) with a mean ± SD weight gain of 10.0 ± 1.4 kg. Peak pressure, contact time, contact area, and maximum force in five plantar areas were evaluated using capacitive insoles during gait and orthostatic posture. For 1 year, the plantar pressures of pregnant women were evaluated the last month of each trimester. Comparisons among plantar areas and trimesters were made by analysis of variance.
For orthostatic posture, no differences in contact time, contact area, peak pressure, and maximum force throughout the trimesters were found. During gait, peak pressure and maximum force of the medial rearfoot were reduced from the first to third and second to third trimesters. Maximum force increased at the medial forefoot from the first to second trimester. Contact area increased at the lateral rearfoot from the second to third trimester and at the midfoot from the first to third trimester. Contact time increased at the midfoot and medial and lateral forefoot from the first to third trimester.
Pregnant women do not alter plantar pressure during orthostatic posture, but, during gait, the plantar loads were redistributed from the rearfoot (decrease) to the midfoot and forefoot (increase) throughout pregnancy. These adjustments help maintain the dynamic stability of the pregnant woman during locomotion. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 101(5): 415–423, 2011)
Corresponding author: Ana Paula Ribeiro, Physical Therapy, Speech, and Occupational Therapy Department, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, R. Cipotânia, 51, Cidade Universitária – São Paulo – SP, Brasil, 056360–160. (E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com)