advertising
-
1.
Special Olympics Web site .Available at: http://www.specialolympics.org. .Accessed March 11, 2009.
-
2.
Platt, LS . :Medical and orthopaedic conditions in Special Olympics athletes. .J Athl Train 36::74. ,2001. .
-
3.
Hild, U, C Hey, U Baumann, et al. :High prevalence of hearing disorders at the Special Olympics indicate need to screen persons with intellectual disability. .J Intellect Disabil Res 52::520. ,2008. .
-
4.
Gustavson, KH, O Umb-Carlsson, and K Sonnander. :A follow-up study of mortality, health conditions and associated disabilities of people with intellectual disabilities in a Swedish county. .J Intellect Disabil Res 49::905. ,2005. .
-
5.
Jenkins, DW, K Cooper, R O’Connor, et al. :Prevalence of podiatric conditions seen in Special Olympics athletes: structural, biomechanical and dermatological findings. .Foot (Edinb) 21::15. ,2011. .
-
6.
Mik, G, PA Gholve, DM Scher, et al. :Down syndrome: orthopedic issues. .Curr Opin Pediatr 20::30. ,2008. .
-
7.
Concolino, D, A Pasquzzi, G Capalbo, et al. :Early detection of podiatric anomalies in children with Down syndrome. .Aca Paediatr 95::17. ,2006. .
-
8.
Diamond, LS, D Lynne, and B Sigman. :Orthopedic disorders in patients with Down’s syndrome. .Orthop Clin North Am 12::57. ,1981. .
-
9.
Scheffler, NM . :Down’s syndrome and clinical findings related to the foot. .JAPA 63::18. ,1973. .
-
10.
Mahan, KT, E Diamond, and D Brown. :Podiatric profile of the Down’s syndrome individual. .JAPA 73::173. ,1983. .
-
11.
Prasher, VP, L Robinson, VH Krishnan, et al. :Podiatric disorders among children with Down syndrome and learning disability. .Dev Med Child Neurol .37::131. ,1995. .
-
12.
Yam, W, P Ting Tse, C Yu, et al. :Medical issues among children and teenagers with Down syndrome in Hong Kong. .Downs Syndrome Res Pract 12::138. ,2008. .
-
13.
Block, SS, SA Beckerman, and PE Berman. :Vision profile of the athletes of the 1995 Special Olympics World Summer Games. .J Am Optom Assoc 68::699. ,1997. .
-
14.
Woodhouse, JM, PM Adler, and A Duignan. :Ocular and visual defects amongst people with intellectual disabilities participating in Special Olympics. .Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 23::221. ,2003. .
-
15.
Woodhouse, JM, P Adler, and A Duignan. :Vision in athletes with intellectual disabilities: the need for improved eye care. .J Intellect Disabil Res 48::736. ,2004. .
-
16.
Turner, S, M Sweeney, C Kennedy, et al. :The oral health of people with intellectual disability participating in the UK Special Olympics. .J Intellect Disabil Res 52::29. ,2008. .
-
17.
Pezzementi, ML and MA Fisher. :Oral health status of people with intellectual disabilities in the southeastern United States. .J Am Dent Assoc 136::903. ,2005. .
-
18.
Dellavia, C, C Allievi, A Pallavera, et al. :Oral health conditions in Italian Special Olympics athletes. .Spec Care Dentist 29::69. ,2009. .
-
19.
Feldman, CA, M Giniger, M Sanders, et al. :Special Olympics, special smiles: assessing the feasibility of epidemiologic data collection. .J Am Dent Assoc 128::1687. ,1997. .
-
20.
Reid, BC, R Chenette, and MD Macek. :Special Olympics: the oral health status of U.S. athletes compared with international athletes. .Spec Care Dentist 23::230. ,2003. .
-
21.
Kumar Sinha, A, JK Montgomery, GR Herer, et al. :Hearing screening outcomes for persons with intellectual disability: a preliminary report of findings from the 2005 Special Olympics World Winter Games. .Int J Audiol 47::399. ,2008. .
-
22.
Starska, K and M Lukomski. :Realization of International Healthy Hearing Program in Poland: hearing evaluation in participants of Special Olympics. .Adv Med Sci 51::197. ,2006. .
-
23.
Neumann, K, G Dettmer, HA Euler, et al. :Auditory status of persons with intellectual disability at the German Special Olympic Games. .Int J Audiol 45::83. ,2006. .
-
24.
Fleischer Jr, AB, SR Feldman, FA Lupton, et al. :1999. Special Olympics World Summer Games: dermatologic health screening results. .J Am Acad Dermatol 44::700. ,2001. .
-
25.
Batshaw, M and B Shapiro. : “Developmental Disabilities. ,” inChildren with Disabilities. , edited byBatshaw, M. , p231. ,Paul H Brookes Publishing Co. ,Baltimore. ,2007. .
-
26.
The Brannock Device Co Web site .Available at: http://www.brannock.com/cgi-bin/start.cgi/brannock/instructions.html. .Accessed September 5, 2009.
-
27.
Rossi, WA . :The high incidence of mismated feet in the population. .Foot Ankle 4::105. ,1983. .
-
28.
Burns, SL, GP Leese, and ME McMurdo. :Older people and ill fitting shoes. .Postgrad Med J 78::344. ,2002. .
-
29.
Paiva de Castro, A, JR Rebelatto, and TR Aurichio. :The relationship between wearing incorrectly sized shoes and foot dimensions, foot pain, and diabetes. .J Sport Rehabil 19::214. ,2010. .
-
30.
Nixon, BP, DG Armstrong, C Wendell, et al. :Do US veterans wear appropriately sized shoes? the Veterans Affairs shoe size selection study. .JAPMA 96::290. ,2006. .
-
31.
Mharada, CM and GN Siperstein. :The sport experience of athletes with intellectual disabilities: a national survey of Special Olympics athletes and their families. .Adapt Phys Activ Q 26::68. ,2009. .
-
32.
Gibbs, RC . :Toe nail disease secondary to poorly fitting shoes or abnormal biomechanics. .Cutis 36::399. ,1985. .
-
33.
Ogawa, R and H Hyakusoku. :Does Egyptian foot present an increased risk of ingrown toenail? Plast Reconstr Surg 117::2111. ,2006. .
Foot-to-Shoe Mismatch and Rates of Referral in Special Olympics Athletes
Special Olympics, Arizona Fit Feet, Phoenix, AZ.
Search for other papers by David W. Jenkins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kimbal Cooper in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rachel O’Connor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Liane Watanabe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background:
Improperly fitted shoes are frequently seen in athletes participating in Special Olympics competitions. This foot-to-shoe mismatch may result in deformities as well as discomfort and reduced performance or injuries in competitions. A primary purpose for providing medical screenings is to identify conditions unknown and to promptly refer to an appropriate provider for evaluation and care. This study attempts to determine the prevalence of improperly fitted shoes and the rate of referral for Special Olympics athletes screened at Fit Feet venues.
Methods:
To evaluate the foot-to-shoe mismatch and rate of referral, 4,094 Fit Feet screenings of Special Olympics athletes participating in US competitions in 2005 to 2009 were analyzed. The participants were 58.5% male and 41.5% female, with a median age of 25.6 years. A power analysis and the χ2 test were used. The athletes voluntarily underwent a foot screening that followed the standardized Special Olympics Fit Feet protocol. The Brannock Device for measuring feet was used to assess proper fit.
Results:
A proper fit was found in 58.56% of the athletes, with 28.60% wearing shoes too big and 12.84% wearing shoes too small. Unrelated to shoe fit, 20% of the athletes required referrals for professional follow-up based on abnormal clinical findings.
Conclusions:
There is a significant (41.44%) mismatch of foot to shoe in Special Olympics athletes. The most common mismatch is a shoe too big, with a much smaller number of athletes having shoes too small. Awareness of this foot-to-shoe incompatibility may be useful for the development of shoes better designed for athletes with a foot structure not consistent with conventional shoes. Because 20% of the athletes required a referral for professional follow-up, Fit Feet examinations are important for identifying athletes with conditions that can be more readily evaluated and treated, thus improving the athletes’ comfort and performance. Beyond knowing the rate of referral, future studies can determine the conditions or findings that necessitate a referral and the ultimate outcome of that referral. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 102(3): 187–197, 2012)
advertising
