Advertisement
-
1.
Havlickova, A, VA Czaika, and M Friedrich. :Epidemiological trends in skin mycoses worldwide. .Mycoses 51 ( suppl 4:) :2. ,2008. .
-
2.
Perea, S, MJ Ramos, M Garau, et al. :Prevalence and risk factors of tinea unguim and tinea pedis in the general population in Spain. .J Clin Microbiol 35::3226. ,2000. .
-
3.
Aly, R . :Ecology and epidemiology of dermatophyte infections. .J Am Acad Dermatol 31::S21. ,1994. .
-
4.
Altunay, ZT, M Ilkit, and Y Denli. :Investigation of tinea pedis and toenail onychomycosis prevalence in patients with psoriasis. .Mikrobiyol Bul 43::439. ,2009. .
-
5.
Broughton, R . :Reinfection from socks and shoes in tinea pedis. .Br J Dermatol 67::249. ,1955. .
-
6.
Ungpakorn, R, S Lohaprathan, and S Reangchainam. :Prevalence of foot diseases in outpatients attending the Institute of Dermatology, Bangkok, Thailand. .Clin Exp Dermatol 29::87. ,2004. .
-
7.
Ajello, L and ME Getz. :Recovery of dermatophytes from shoes and shower stalls. .J Invest Dermatol 22::17. ,1954. .
-
8.
Tanaka, K, T Katoh, J Irimajiri, et al. :Preventive effects of various types of footwear and cleaning methods on dermatophyte adhesion. .J Dermatol 33::528. ,2006. .
-
9.
Gupta, AK, I Ahmad, and RC Summerbell. :Comparative efficacies of commonly used disinfectants and antifungal pharmaceutical spray preparations against dermatophytic fungi. .Med Mycol 39::321. ,2001. .
-
10.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health .NIOSH eNews 5::12. ,2008. .
-
11.
Katara, G, N Hemvani, S Chitnis, et al. :Surface disinfection by exposure to germicidal UV light. .Ind J Med Microbiol 26::241. ,2008. .
-
12.
Krishnamurthy, K, JC Tewari, J Irudayara, et al. :Microscopic and spectroscopic evaluation of inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus by pulsed UV light. .Food Bioprocess Technol 3::93. ,2010. .
-
13.
Knudsen, EA . :Isolation of dermatophytes from footwear with adhesive tape strips. .J Med Vet Mycol 25::59. ,1986. .
-
14.
Andersen, BM, H Banrud, E Boe, et al. :Comparison of UV C light and chemicals for disinfection of surfaces in hospital isolation units. .Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 27::729. ,2006. .
-
15.
Bak, J, TM Jorgenson, J Helfmann, et al. :Potential in vivo UVC disinfection of catheter lumens: estimation of the doses received by the blood flow outside the catheter tip hole. .Photochem Photobiol 87::350. ,2011. .
-
16.
Lutz, EA, S Sharma, B Casto, et al. :Effectiveness of UV-C equipped vacuum at reducing culturable surface-bound microorganisms on carpets. .Environ Sci Technol 44::9451. ,2010. .
Optimization of an Infected Shoe Model for the Evaluation of an Ultraviolet Shoe Sanitizer Device
Background:
Onychomycosis and tinea pedis (athlete’s foot) are infections of the nails and skin caused by pathogenic fungi collectively known as dermatophytes. These infections are difficult to treat, and patients often relapse; it is thought that a patient’s footwear becomes infected with these fungal organisms and, thus, is an important reservoir for reinfection. Therefore, it is important to find an effective means for killing the dermatophytes that may have colonized the inner surface of the shoes of patients with superficial fungal infections. In this study, we developed an in vitro model for culturing dermatophytes in footwear and used this model to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercial ultraviolet shoe sanitizer in eradicating the fungal elements residing in shoes.
Methods:
Leather and athletic shoes (24 pairs) were inoculated with either Trichophyton rubrum or Trichophyton mentagrophytes (107 colony-forming units/mL) strains and were placed at 35°C for 4 to 5 days. Next, we compared the ability of swabbing versus scraping to collect microorganisms from infected shoes. Following the optimized method, shoes were infected and were irradiated with one to three cycles of radiation. The inner surfaces of the shoes were swabbed or scraped, and the specimens were cultured for dermatophyte colony-forming units.
Results:
Leather and canvas shoes were infected to the same extent. Moreover, scraping with a scalpel was overall more effective than was swabbing with a cotton-tipped applicator in recovering viable fungal elements. Irradiation of shoes with one, two, or three cycles resulted in reduction of fungal colonization to the same extent.
Conclusions:
The developed infected shoe model is useful for assessing the effectiveness of ultraviolet shoe sanitizers. Also, ultraviolet treatment of shoes with a commercial ultraviolet C sanitizing device was effective in reducing the fungal burden in shoes. These findings have implications regarding breaking foot infection cycles. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 102(4): 309–313, 2012)
