advertising
-
1.
McClure, A . :Lecture capture: a fresh look. .University Business Web site .April 2008. .Available at: http://www.universitybusiness.com/viewarticle.aspx?articleid=1043&p=1. .Accessed September 12, 2012.
-
2.
Kolowich, S . :Fans and fears of “lecture capture.”. Inside Higher Education Web site .November 9,2009. .Available at: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/11/09/capture. .Accessed September 12, 2012.
-
3.
von Konsky, BR, J Ivins, and SJ Gribble. :Lecture attendance and web based lecture technologies: a comparison of student perceptions and usage patterns. .Australasian J Educ Tech 25::581. ,2009. .
-
4.
Mediasite by Sonic Foundry .Available at: http://www.sonicfoundry.com. .Accessed September, 12 2012.
-
5.
Charlton, BG . :Lectures are an effective teaching method because they exploit human evolved “human nature” to improve learning .2009. .Available at: http://www.hedweb.com/bgcharlton/ed-lect.html. .Accessed November 7, 2012.
-
6.
Massingham, P and T Herrington. :Does attendance matter? an examination of student attitudes, participation, performance and attendance. .J Univ Teach Learn Pract 3::3. ,2006. .
-
7.
The Crimson Staff :Harvard should use new technology to make more course multimedia available online. .The Harvard Crimson ,February 14,2006. .Available at: http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=511262. .Accessed February 2006.
-
8.
Educause Learning Initiative/ELI :DukeCapture: automated classroom lecture recording .May 2006. .Available at: http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI5011.pdf. .Accessed November 7, 2012.
-
9.
Davis, SJ, A Connelly, and E Linfield. :Lecture capture: making the most of face-to-face learning. .Engineer Educ 4::4. ,2009. .
-
10.
Arulampalam, W, RA Naylor, and J Smith. :Am I missing something? the effects of absence from class on student performance .November 2007. .Available at: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/workingpapers/publications/twerp_820.pdf. .Accessed November 2007.
-
11.
Bertsch, TF, PW Callas, A Rubin, et al. :Effectiveness of lectures attended via interactive video conferencing versus in-person in preparing third-year internal medicine clerkship students for Clinical Practice Examinations (CPX). .Teach Learn Med 19::4. ,2007. .
-
12.
Billings-Gagliardi, S and KM Mazor. :Student decisions about lecture attendance: do electronic course materials matter? Acad Med 82 ( suppl:):S73. ,2007. .
-
13.
Cardall, S, E Krupat, and M Ulrich. :Live lecture versus video-recorded lecture: are students voting with their feet? Acad Med 83::1174. ,2008. .
-
14.
Davis, J, S Crabb, E Rogers, et al. :Computer-based teaching is as good as face to face lecture-based teaching of evidence based medicine: a randomized controlled trial. .Med Teach 30::302. ,2008. .
Lecture Capture
Enhancing Learning Through Technology at the Kent State University College of Podiatric Medicine
Search for other papers by Priscilla M. DiBacco in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vincent J. Hetherington in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David Putman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background:
The intent of this research was to evaluate the Mediasite lecture capture system at the Kent State University College of Podiatric Medicine (formerly the Ohio College of Podiatric Medicine) to determine the acceptance, use and benefits to both students and faculty and to identify any concerns, limitations, and suggestions for expansion. There is extreme debate on the effect of lecture capture on student attendance included in the research.
Methods:
Two surveys were compiled, one each for students and faculty. These were distributed by email to the entire student body and all full-time and part-time faculty. Responses were voluntary. The questions sought to identify the priorities of the participant, reasons for viewing lectures compiled by course, to assess any effect on class attendance and to evaluate the ease and use of the technical function. There was also a section for subjective responses and suggestions.
Results:
The tabulations proved a very high use of the program with the most important reason being to prepare for exams. The question of class attendance is still open to interpretation. Technically, the Mediasite system was ranked easy to use by both groups.
Conclusions:
The results of this survey confirm the concept of lecture capture as an integral segment of advanced education. Though this system should not replace class attendance, it is a vital supplement to course work and study. By reviewing all of the components of the survey those who may have concerns on its effectiveness are also aware of the advantages. The results of this study met all the objectives to evaluate use and obtain viewpoints to improve and expand the program. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 102(6): 491–498, 2012)
advertising
advertising
