• 1.

    Shaw, GP . : “The Changing Role of Faculty. ,” inThe Encyclopedia of Distance Education, ,2nd Ed. , ed byHoward, C, J Boetcher, L Justice, et al. , p266. ,The Idea Group Reference. ,Hershey, PA. ,2009. .

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Jones, RF and JD Froom. :Faculty and administration views of problems in faculty evaluation. .Acad Med 69::476. ,1994. .

  • 3.

    Mckeachie, MJ . :Student ratings: the validity of use. .Am Psychol 52::1218. ,1997. .

  • 4.

    Steiner, S, LC Holley, K Gerdes, et al. :Evaluating teaching: listening to students while acknowledging bias. .J Soc Work Educ 42::355. ,2006. .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Johnson, VE . :Grade Inflation: A Crisis in College Education. ,Springer. ,New York. ,2003. .

  • 6.

    Simpson, PM and JA Siguaw. :Student evaluations of teaching: an exploratory study of the faculty response. .J Marketing Educ 22::199. ,2000. .

  • 7.

    Gillmore, GM and AG Greenwald. :Using statistical adjustment to reduce biases in student ratings. .Am Psychol 54::518. ,1999. .

  • 8.

    Naftulin, DH, JE Ware, and FA Donnelly. :The Dr Fox lecture: a paradigm of educational seduction. .J Med Educ 48::630. ,1973. .

  • 9.

    Yunker, P and J Yunker. :Are student evaluations of teaching valid? evidence from an analytical business core course. .J Educ Bus 78::313. ,2003. .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Lowenstein, SR, G Fernandez, and LA Crane. :Medical school faculty discontent: prevalence and predictors of intent to leave academic careers. .BMC Med Educ 7::1. ,2007. .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    US Department of Education :A Test of Leadership: Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education. ,US Department of Education. ,Washington, DC. ,2006. .

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Brown, MJ . :Student perceptions of teaching evaluations. .J Instruct Psychol 35::177. ,2008. .

  • 13.

    Shell, R . :Perceived barriers to teaching for critical thinking by BSN nursing faculty. .Nurs Health Care Perspect 22::286. ,2001. .

  • 14.

    Cronholm, PF, K Margo, G Bazelon, et al. :Student attitudes: potential barriers to implementing a community medicine field activity. .Fam Med 41::22. ,2009. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Weinberg, BA, BM Fleisher, and M Hashimoto. :Evaluating methods for evaluating instruction: the case of higher education. .NBER Working Paper No. 12844 ,2007. .Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w12844. .Accessed September 12, 2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Measuring Teaching Effectiveness—or Not

Graham P. Shaw Barry University, School of Podiatric Medicine, 11300 NE 2nd Ave, Miami Shores, FL 33161. (E-mail: gshaw@mail.barry.edu)

Search for other papers by Graham P. Shaw in
Current site
Google Scholar
Restricted access

Faculty in the present-day academic medicine environment are expected to perform multiple functions, notably, the provision of high-quality teaching to the medical professionals of tomorrow. However, evaluating the effectiveness of this teaching is particularly difficult. Student evaluations of teaching, despite their many flaws, are widely used as a convenient tool to measure teaching effectiveness. Administrators continue to routinely use student evaluation of teaching surveys in faculty retention/promotion and merit pay decisions. This practice should be reevaluated since it may have unintended consequences, such as grade inflation and content debasement, and may contribute to faculty leaving the institution and even the profession. A more valid, reliable, and formative protocol for the evaluation of genuine teaching effectiveness needs to be developed as a matter of some urgency. In this review, alternatives to the student evaluation of teaching are explored to better measure true teaching effectiveness. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 103(1): 94–96, 2013)