• 1.

    Fields KB, Sykes JC, Walker KM, et al: Prevention of running injuries. Curr Sports Med Rep 9: 176, 2010.

  • 2.

    Nielsen RO, Buist I, Sorensen H, et al: Training errors and running related injuries: a systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther 7: 58, 2012.

  • 3.

    Van Mechelen W: Running injuries: a review of the epidemiologic literature. Sports Med 14: 320, 1992.

  • 4.

    Johnston CA, Taunton JE, Lloyd-Smith DR, et al: Preventing running injuries: practical approach for family doctors. Can Fam Physician 49: 1101, 2003.

  • 5.

    Richards CE, Magin PJ, Callister R: Is your prescription of distance running shoes evidence-based? Br J Sports Med 43: 159, 2009.

  • 6.

    Jenkins DW, Cauthon DJ: Barefoot running claims and controversies: a review of the literature. JAPMA 101: 231, 2011.

  • 7.

    Robbins SE, Hanna AM: Running-related injury prevention through barefoot adaptations. Med Sci Sports Exerc 19: 148, 1987.

  • 8.

    Lieberman DE: What we can learn about running from barefoot running: an evolutionary medical perspective. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 40: 63, 2012.

  • 9.

    Hreljac A: Etiology, prevention, and early intervention of overuse injuries in runners: a biomechanical perspective. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 16: 651, 2005.

  • 10.

    Ferber R, McClay-Davis I, Hamill J, et al: Kinetic variables in subjects with previous lower extremity stress fractures. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34: S5, 2002.

  • 11.

    Grimston SK, Nigg BM, Fisher V, et al: External loads throughout a 45-minute run in stress fracture and non-stress fracture runners. J Biomech 27: 668, 1994.

  • 12.

    Hreljac A, Marshall RN, Hume PA: Evaluation of lower extremity overuse injury potential in runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32: 1635, 2000.

  • 13.

    Messier SP, Davis SE, Curl WW, et al: Etiologic factors associated with patellofemoral pain in runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23: 1008, 1991.

  • 14.

    Davis I, Bowser B, Mullineaux D: Do impacts cause running injuries? a prospective investigation. Amer Soc Biomech 1335, 2010.

  • 15.

    Ferris DP, Louie M, Farley CT: Running in the real world: adjusting leg stiffness for different surfaces. Proc Biol Sci 265: 989, 1998.

  • 16.

    Nigg BM, Wakeling JM: Impact forces and muscle tuning: a new paradigm. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 29: 37, 2001.

  • 17.

    Leung AK, Mak AF, Evans JH: Biomedical gait evaluation of the immediate effect of orthotic treatment for flexible flat foot. Prosthet Orthot Int 22: 25, 1998.

  • 18.

    Messier SP, Pittala KA: Etiologic factors associated with selected running injuries. Med Sci Sports Exerc 20: 501, 1988.

  • 19.

    Milner CE, Hamill J, Davis IS: Distinct hip and rearfoot kinematics in female runners with a history of tibial stress fracture. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 40: 59, 2010.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Stewart SF: Footgear: its history, uses and abuses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 88: 119, 1972.

  • 21.

    Kong PW, Candelaria NG, Smith DR: Running in new and worn shoes: a comparison of three types of cushioning footwear. Br J Sports Med 43: 745, 2009.

  • 22.

    Ferris DP, Liang K, Farley CT: Runners adjust leg stiffness for their first step on a new running surface. J Biomech 32: 787, 1999.

  • 23.

    Cheung RT, Wong MY, Ng GY: Effects of motion control footwear on running: a systematic review. J Sports Sci 29: 1311, 2011.

  • 24.

    van Gent RN, Siem D, van Middelkoop M, et al: Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 41: 469, 2007.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Lieberman DE, Venkadesan M, Werbel WA, et al: Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners. Nature 463: 531, 2010.

  • 26.

    McDougall C: Born to Run: A Hidden Tribe, Superathletes, and the Greatest Race the World Has Never Seen, Knopf, New York, 2009.

  • 27.

    Robbins SE, Gouw GJ: Athletic footwear: unsafe due to perceptual illusions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23: 217, 1991.

  • 28.

    Ker RF, Bennett MB, Bibby SR, et al: The spring in the arch of the human foot. Nature 325: 147, 1987.

  • 29.

    Robbins S, Waked E, Allard P, et al: Foot position awareness in younger and older men: the influence of footwear sole properties. J Am Geriatr Soc 45: 61, 1997.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Davies GJ, Ellenbecker TS: Focused exercise aids shoulder hypomobility. Biomechanics 6: 77, 1999.

  • 31.

    McCloskey DI: Kinesthetic sensibility. Physiol Rev 58: 763, 1978.

  • 32.

    Robbins S, Waked E: Factors associated with ankle injuries: preventive measures. Sports Med 25: 63, 1998.

  • 33.

    Robbins S, Hanna A, Jones L: Sensory attenuation induced by modern footwear. J Test Eval 16: 412, 1988.

  • 34.

    Robbins S, Waked E, McClaran J: Proprioception and stability: foot position awareness as a function of age and footwear. Age Ageing 24: 67, 1995.

  • 35.

    Rao UB, Joseph B: The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flat foot: a survey of 2300 children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74: 525, 1992.

  • 36.

    Squadrone R, Gallozzi C: Effect of a five-toed minimal protection shoe on static and dynamic ankle position sense. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 51: 401, 2011.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Daoud AI, Geissler GJ, Wang F, et al: Foot strike and injury rates in endurance runners: a retrospective study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44: 1325, 2012.

  • 38.

    Cardarelli R, Seater MM: Evidence-based medicine, part 4: an introduction to critical appraisal of articles on harm. J Am Osteopath Assoc 107: 310, 2007.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

A Theoretical Perspective on Running-Related Injuries

Jodi Lynn Gallant School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Search for other papers by Jodi Lynn Gallant in
Current site
Google Scholar
 BKin, MSc
Michael Raymond Pierrynowski School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Search for other papers by Michael Raymond Pierrynowski in
Current site
Google Scholar

The etiology of running-related injuries remains unknown; however, an implicit theory underlies much of the conventional research and practice in the prevention of these injuries. This theory posits that the cause of running-related injuries lies in the high-impact forces experienced when the foot contacts the ground and the subsequent abnormal movement of the subtalar joint. The application of this theory is seen in the design of the modern running shoe, with cushioning, support, and motion control. However, a new theory is emerging that suggests that it is the use of these modern running shoes that has caused a maladaptive running style, which contributes to a high incidence of injury among runners. The suggested application of this theory is to cease use of the modern running shoe and transition to barefoot or minimalist running. This new running paradigm, which is at present inadequately defined, is proposed to avoid the adverse biomechanical effects of the modern running shoe. Future research should rigorously define and then test both theories regarding their ability to discover the etiology of running-related injury. Once discovered, the putative cause of running-related injury will then provide an evidence-based rationale for clinical prevention and treatment.

Corresponding author: Jodi Lynn Gallant, BKin, MSc, School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5. (E-mail: gallaj4@mcmaster.ca)