• 1

    Lee WE: Podiatric biomechanics: an historical appraisal and discussion of the Root model as a clinical system of approach in the present context of theoretical uncertainty. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 18: 555, 2001.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Root ML, Orien WP, Weed JH: Normal and Abnormal Function of the Foot, Clinical Biomechanics Corp, Los Angeles, 1977.

  • 3

    Menz HB: Clinical hindfoot measurement: a critical review of the literature. The Foot 5: 57, 1995.

  • 4

    Payne CB: The past, present, and future of podiatric biomechanics. JAPMA 88: 53, 1998.

  • 5

    Payne CB: Should the baby be thrown out with the bathwater? Australas J Podiatr Med 31: 73, 1997.

  • 6

    Kirby KA: Methods for determination of positional variations in the subtalar joint axis. JAPMA 77: 228, 1987.

  • 7

    Payne CB, Bird AR: Teaching clinical biomechanics in the context of uncertainty. JAPMA 89: 525, 1999.

  • 8

    Kirby KA: “Evolution of Foot Orthoses in Sports,” in Athletic Footwear and Orthoses in Sports Medicine, edited by MB Werd, EL Knight, p 19, Springer Science, New York, 2010.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    De Schepper J, Van Alsenoy K, Rijckaert J, et al: Intratest reliability in determining the subtalar joint axis using the palpation technique described by K. Kirby. JAPMA 102: 122, 2012.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Van Alsenoy KK, De Schepper J, Santos D, et al: The Subtalar Joint Axis Palpation Technique—Part 1. JAPMA 104: 238, 2014.

  • 11

    Lewis GS, Cohen TL, Seisler AR, et al: In vivo tests of an improved method for functional location of the subtalar joint axis. J Biomech 42: 146, 2009.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Leardini A, Stagni R, O'Connor JJ: Mobility of the subtalar joint in the intact ankle complex. J Biomech 34: 805, 2001.

  • 13

    Lundberg A, Svensson OK: The axes of rotation of the talocalcaneal and talonavicular joints. The Foot 3: 65, 1993.

  • 14

    van Langelaan EJ: A kinematical analysis of the tarsal joints: an X-ray photogrammetric study. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 204: 1, 1983.

  • 15

    Payne C, Munteanu S, Miller K: Position of the subtalar joint axis and resistance of the rearfoot to supination. JAPMA 93: 131, 2003.

  • 16

    Elveru RA, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL: Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting: subtalar and ankle joint measurements. Phys Ther 68: 672, 1988.

The Subtalar Joint Axis Palpation Technique

Part 2: Reliability and Validity Results Using Cadaver Feet

Ken K. Van Alsenoy Department of Podiatry, Artevelde University College, Ghent, Belgium.

Search for other papers by Ken K. Van Alsenoy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MSc
,
Kristiaan D'Août Department of Biology, Antwerp University, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, England.

Search for other papers by Kristiaan D'Août in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Evie E. Vereecke KU Leuven, Dept. Development & Regeneration (@ Kulak), Kortrijk, Belgium.

Search for other papers by Evie E. Vereecke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Joris De Schepper Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physical Therapy, Ghent University. Ghent, Belgium.

Search for other papers by Joris De Schepper in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MSc
, and
Derek Santos School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, Musselburgh, Scotland.

Search for other papers by Derek Santos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Background

Clinically locating the point of no rotation to determine the subtalar joint axis location by applying pressure on the plantar surface of the foot was described by Kirby in 1987 but was never validated. We sought to extend a previously validated mechanical model to cadaver feet and to examine the intratester and intertester reliability.

Methods

Four testers with different levels of experience determined the subtalar joint axis location and moved the subtalar joint through its range of motion, capturing the movement using kinematic analysis. The comparison of the spatial subtalar joint axis location as determined by palpation between and within testers determined the intertester and intratester reliability. The helical axis method was performed to validate the model.

Results

The intrarater reliability varied from a high of α = 0.96 to a low of α = 0.26 for the slope and was, in general, high (α = 0.78–0.95) for the intersection. The interrater reliability scored moderate to high, depending on the specific cadaver specimen. Concerning the exact location of the subtalar joint axis, no significant difference was found between the results determined by different testers and the helical axis method.

Conclusions

The palpation technique as part of the subtalar joint axis location and rotational equilibrium theory proposed by Kirby is a reliable and valid clinical tool. Experience in performing the palpation technique has a positive influence on the accuracy of the results. In the context of evidence-based practice, this technique could be a standard tool in the examination of patients with lower-limb–related pathologic disorders.

Corresponding author: Ken K. Van Alsenoy, MSc, Department of Podiatry, Artevelde University College, Voetweg 66, Ghent, 9000, Belgium. (E-mail: kenvanalsenoy@gmail.com)
Save