• 1

    Halpern AV, Heymann WR: Bacterial Disease,” in Dermatology, 2nd Ed, edited by JL Bolognia, JL Jorizzo, RP Rapini, p 1075, Elsevier Ltd, Barcelona, 2008.

  • 2

    Karakatsanis G, Vakirlis E, Kastoridou C, et al: Coexistence of pityriasis versicolor and erythrasma. Mycoses 47: 343, 2004.

  • 3

    Stulberg DL, Penrod MA, Blatny RA: Common bacterial skin infections. Am Fam Physician 66: 119, 2002.

  • 4

    Morales-Trujillo ML, Arenas R, Arroyo S: Interdigital erythrasma: clinical, epidemiologic, and microbiologic findings [in Spanish]. Actas Dermosifiliogr 99: 469, 2008.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Henry JB: Clinical, Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods, 20th Ed, p 1096, WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia, 2001.

  • 6

    Svejgaard E, Christophersen J, Jelsdorf HM: Tinea pedis and erythrasma in Danish recruits. J Am Acad Dermatol 14: 993, 1986.

  • 7

    Karaca S, Kulac M, Cetinkaya Z, et al: Etiology of foot intertrigo in the District of Afyonkarahisar, Turkey: a bacteriologic and mycologic study. JAPMA 98: 42, 2008.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Inci M, Serarslan G, Ozer B, et al: The prevalence of interdigital erythrasma in southern region of Turkey. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 26: 1372, 2012.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Blaise G, Nikkels AF, Hermanns-Le T, et al: Corynebacterium-associated skin infections. Int J Dermatol 47: 884, 2008.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Allen S, Christmas TI, McKinney W, et al: The Auckland skin clinic tinea pedis and erythrasma study. N Z Med J 103: 391, 1990.

The Prevalence of Interdigital Erythrasma

A Prospective Study from an Outpatient Clinic in Turkey

Muhterem Polat Private Koru Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Dr. Polat is now with Department of Dermatology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Muhterem Polat in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
and
Mustafa N. İlhan Department of Public Health, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Mustafa N. İlhan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD

Background

Erythrasma is a superficial skin infection caused by Corynebacterium minutissimum. Interdigital erythrasma is the most common form and is easily confused with tinea pedis. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of interdigital erythrasma in patients with clinically suspected tinea pedis.

Methods

This study was performed between January 1, 2011, and January 31, 2012. It included 182 patients who presented with concerns about interdigital lesions. All of the patients were examined with a Wood's lamp, and smears were stained with Gram's method. Direct examination with 20% potassium hydroxide was performed.

Results

Of 182 patients with interdigital lesions, 73 (40.1%) were diagnosed as having erythrasma. The mean ± SD age of the patients with erythrasma was 45.52 ± 10.83 years (range, 22–70 years). Most of the patients with erythrasma were women (56.2%). The most often clinical finding was desquamation. Using only Wood's lamp examination or Gram's staining resulted in 31 (42.5%) or 14 (19.2%) positive patients, respectively. Using Wood's lamp examination and Gram's staining concurrently resulted in 28 positive patients (38.4%).

Conclusions

Interdigital erythrasma is a common condition and can be difficult to differentiate from tinea pedis. Simple and rapid diagnosis can be made with Wood's lamp examination, but Gram's staining is also a useful method, especially in patients with negative Wood's lamp examination findings.

Corresponding author: Muhterem Polat, MD, Department of Dermatology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. (E-mail: drmuhterempolat@mynet.com)
Save