Flemister AS Jr, Infante AF, Sanders RW, et al: Subtalar arthrodesis for complications of intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int 21: 392, 2000.
Chahal J, Stephen DJ, Bulmer B, et al: Factors associated with outcome after subtalar arthrodesis. J Orthop Trauma 20: 555, 2006.
Easley ME, Trnka H-J, Schon LC, et al: Isolated subtalar arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82: 613, 2000.
Davies MB, Rosenfeld PF, Stavrou P, et al: A comprehensive review of subtalar arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 28: 295, 2007.
Albert A, Deleu P-A, Leemrijse T, et al: Posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis: ten cases at one-year follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97: 401, 2011.
Astion DJ, Deland JT, Otis JC, et al: Motion of the hindfoot after simulated arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79: 241, 1997.
Wülker N, Stukenborg C, Savory KM, et al: Hindfoot motion after isolated and combined arthrodeses: measurements in anatomic specimens. Foot Ankle Int 21: 921, 2000.
Glanzmann MC, Sanhueza-Hernandez R: Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hindfoot: a prospective study of 41 cases. Foot Ankle Int 28: 2, 2007.
Carr JB, Hansen ST, Benirschke SK: Subtalar distraction bone block fusion for late complications of os calcis fractures. Foot Ankle Int 9: 81, 1988.
Chandler JT, Bonar SK, Anderson RB, et al: Results of in situ subtalar arthrodesis for late sequelae of calcaneus fractures. Foot Ankle Int 20: 18, 1999.
SooHoo NF, Vyas R, Samini D: Responsiveness of the foot function index, AOFAS clinical rating systems, and SF-36 after foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int 27: 930, 2006.
Russotti GM, Cass JR, Johnson KA: Isolated talocalcaneal arthrodesis: a technique using moldable bone graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70: 1472, 1988.
Pearce TJ, Buckley RE: Subtalar joint movement: clinical and computed tomography scan correlation. Foot Ankle Int 20: 428, 1999.
Hertel J, Denegar CR, Monroe MM, et al: Talocrural and subtalar joint instability after lateral ankle sprain. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31: 1501, 1999.
Louwerens JW, Ginai AZ, van Linge B, et al: Stress radiography of the talocrural and subtalar joints. Foot Ankle Int 16: 148, 1995.
van Hellemondt FJ, Louwerens JW, Sijbrandij ES, et al: Stress radiography and stress examination of the talocrural and subtalar joint on helical computed tomography. Foot Ankle Int 18: 482, 1997.
Background: Subtalar arthrodesis is a common therapy for subtalar joint disorders. In this article, we evaluate the effect of subtalar arthrodesis on the ankle and hindfoot joints.
Methods: Fifty patients (33 men and 17 women) underwent subtalar arthrodesis between January 1, 1996, and August 31, 2011. The 36-item Short-Form Health Survey and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle hindfoot scores were used for clinical evaluation. Radiographic analysis included assessment of degenerative changes and ankle and hindfoot joint function in the frontal and sagittal planes.
Results: Thirty-seven patients (27 men and 10 women; mean age, 42.6 years) were followed up for an average of 9.2 years (range, 2–17 years). The mean ± SD 36-item Short-Form Health Survey score improved from 30.21 ± 7.19 before surgery to 78.50 ± 12.23, and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle hindfoot score increased from 50.32 ± 12.39 to 73.14 ± 15.44. Degenerative changes in the talonavicular, calcaneocuboid, metatarsocuboid, and ankle joints occurred. The talar-vertical angle was positively related to the tibial-plantar minimal angle (affected side: r = 0.56; P < .01; healthy side: r = 0.46; P < .01). The difference in hindfoot height is positively related to the difference in tibial-plantar minimal angle (r = 0.54; P < .01).
Conclusions: Subtalar arthrodesis is effective treatment for subtalar joint disease but could induce joint degeneration and ankle joint motion limitation related to talar declination and hindfoot height.