Plymale M, Donnelly M, Lawton J, et al: Faculty evaluation of surgery clerkship students: important components of written comments. Acad Med77: S45, 2002.1237770210.1097/00001888-200210001-00015)| false
Awad SS, Liscum KR, Aoki N, et al: Does the subjective evaluation of medical student surgical knowledge correlate with written and oral exam performance?
J Surg Res
104: 36, 2002.1197167510.1006/jsre.2002.6401)| false
Dudas R, Colbert J, Goldstein S, et al: Validity of faculty and resident global assessment of medical students' clinical knowledge during their pediatrics clerkship. Acad Pediatr12: 138, 2012.10.1016/j.acap.2011.09.00222056224)| false
van Hell E, Kuks J, Schönrock-Adema J, et al: Transition to clinical training: influence of pre-clinical knowledge and skills, and consequences for clinical performance. Med Educ42: 830, 2008.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03106.x18564098)| false
Background: We assessed the differences in podiatric medical students' clinical professionalism objective scores (CPOSs) by comparing a previous nonrubric evaluation tool with a more recently implemented objective-centered rubric evaluation tool. This type of study has never been performed or reported on in the podiatric medical education literature.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 89 third-year podiatric medical students between academic years 2010-2011 and 2011-2012. A Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was performed to compare CPOSs from the students' first (CPOS1) and second (CPOS2) rotations. A correlation analysis was performed comparing students' grade point averages (GPAs) with each of the individual CPOSs to verify the validity of the rubric evaluation tool.
Results: The Pearson correlation coefficients for the relationship between 2012 CPOS1 and CPOS2 and GPA were r = 0.233 (P ≤ .093) and r = 0.290 (P < .035) and for the relationship between 2013 CPOS1 and CPOS2 and GPA were r = 0.525 (P = .001) and r = 0.730 (P < .001).
Conclusions: These findings suggest that the use of a rubric in the evaluation of podiatric medical students' CPOSs is correlated with their GPAs, and CPOS2 demonstrated a higher correlation than CPOS1. We believe that implementation of the rubric evaluation tool has increased the accuracy of the evaluation of podiatric medical students with respect to CPOSs.
Corresponding author: Kevin M. Smith, DPM, MS, College of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, Des Moines University, 3200 Grand Ave, Des Moines, IA 50312. (E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org)