Kuitunen S, Komi PV, Kyröläinen H: Knee and ankle joint stiffness in sprint running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34: 166, 2002.
Dixon SJ, Hinman RS, Creaby MW, et al: Knee joint stiffness during walking in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 62: 38, 2010.
Zeni JA, Higginson JS: Dynamic knee joint stiffness in subjects with a progressive increase in severity of knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24: 366, 2009.
Crenna P, Frigo C: Dynamics of the ankle joint analyzed through moment–angle loops during human walking: Gender and age effects. Hum Mov Sci 30: 1185, 2011.
Houdijk H, Doets HC, van Middelkoop M, et al: Joint stiffness of the ankle during walking after successful mobile-bearing total ankle replacement. Gait Posture 27: 115, 2008.
Sekiguchi Y, Muraki T, Kuramatsu Y, et al: The contribution of quasi-joint stiffness of the ankle joint to gait in patients with hemiparesis. Clin Biomech 27: 495, 2012.
Shamaei K, Sawicki GS, Dollar AM: Estimation of quasi-stiffness and propulsive work of the human ankle in the stance phase of walking. PLoS One 8: e59935, 2013.
Rouse EJ, Gregg RD, Hargrove LJ, et al: The difference between stiffness and quasi-stiffness in the context of biomechanical modeling. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 60: 562, 2013.
Shamaei K, Sawicki GS, Dollar AM: Estimation of quasi-stiffness of the human hip in the stance phase of walking. PLoS One 8: e81841, 2013.
DeVita P, Hortobagyi T: Age causes a redistribution of joint torques and powers during gait. J Appl Physiol (1985) 88: 1804, 2000.
Tateuchi H, Tsukagoshi R, Fukumoto Y, et al: Dynamic hip joint stiffness in individuals with total hip arthroplasty: relationships between hip impairments and dynamics of the other joints. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 26: 598, 2011.
Leite DX, Vieira JM, Carvalhais VO, et al: Relationship between joint passive stiffness and hip lateral rotator concentric torque. Rev Bras Fisioter 16: 414, 2012.
Davis RB, DeLuca PA: Gait characterization via dynamic joint stiffness. Gait Posture 4: 224, 1996.
Lark SD, Buckley JG, Bennett S, et al: Joint torques and dynamic joint stiffness in elderly and young men during stepping down. Clin Biomech 18: 848, 2003.
Silder A, Heiderscheit B, Thelen DG: Active and passive contributions to joint kinetics during walking in older adults. J Biomech 41: 1520, 2008.
Silder A, Whittington B, Heiderscheit B, et al: Identification of passive elastic joint moment-angle relationships in the lower extremity. J Biomech 40: 2628, 2007.
Faber FW, Kleinrensink GJ, Buyruk HM, et al: Doppler imaging of vibrations as a tool for quantifying first tarsometatarsal joint stiffness. Clin Biomech 15: 761, 2000.
Gabriel RC, Abrantes J, Granata K, et al: Dynamic joint stiffness of the ankle during walking: gender-related differences. Phys Ther Sport 9: 16, 2008.
Hamill J, Gruber AH, Derrick TR: Lower extremity joint stiffness characteristics during running with different footfall patterns. Eur J Sport Sci 14: 130, 2014.
Mauroy G, Schepens B, Willems PA: Leg stiffness and joint stiffness while running to and jumping over an obstacle. J Biomech 47: 526, 2014.
Bruening DA, Cooney KM, Buczek FL: Analysis of a kinetic multi-segment foot model: part I. Model repeatability and kinematic validity. Gait Posture 35: 529, 2012.
Canseco K, Long J, Smedberg T, et al: Multisegmental foot and ankle motion analysis after hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Int 33: 141, 2012.
Jenkyn TR, Anas K, Nichol A: Foot segment kinematics during normal walking using a multisegment model of the foot and ankle complex. J Biomech Eng 131: 034504, 2009.
Rouhani H, Favre J, Crevoisier X, et al: Measurement of multi-segment foot joint angles during gait using a wearable system. J Biomech Eng 134: 061006, 2012.
Saraswat P, Andersen MS, MacWilliams BA: A musculoskeletal foot model for clinical gait analysis. J Biomech 43: 1645, 2010.
Leardini A, Benedetti MG, Catani F, et al: An anatomically based protocol for the description of foot segment kinematics during gait. Clin Biomech 14: 528, 1999.
Leardini A, Benedetti MG, Berti L, et al: Rear-foot, mid-foot and fore-foot motion during the stance phase of gait. Gait Posture 25: 453, 2007.
Legault-Moore D, Chester VL, de Vries G: Multisegment foot kinematics during walking in younger and older adults. J Clin Med Res 4: 259, 2012.
Rattanaprasert U, Smith R, Sullivan M, et al: Three-dimensional kinematics of the forefoot, rearfoot, and leg without the function of tibialis posterior in comparison with normals during stance phase of walking. Clin Biomech 14: 14, 1999.
Kidder SM, Abuzzahab FS Jr, Harris GF, et al: A system for the analysis of foot and ankle kinematics during gait. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 4: 25, 1996.
Söderkvist I, Wedin PA: Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers. J Biomech 26: 1473, 1993.
Grood ES, Suntay WJ: A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105: 136, 1983.
Kirby KA: Rotational equilibrium across the subtalar joint axis. JAPMA 79: 1, 1989.
Kirby KA: Subtalar joint axis location and rotational equilibrium theory of foot function. JAPMA 91: 465, 2001.
Phillips RD, Law EA, Ward ED: Functional motion of the medial column joints of the foot during propulsion. JAPMA 86: 474, 1996.
Rouhani H, Favre J, Crevoisier X, et al: Ambulatory assessment of 3D ground reaction force using plantar pressure distribution. Gait Posture 32: 311, 2010.
Background: Dynamic stiffness can be used for studying foot pathologic abnormalities and for developing prostheses and orthoses. Although previous works have studied the role of ankle joint stiffness during gait, other foot joints have not yet been analyzed. We sought to characterize the dynamic stiffness of the ankle, midtarsal, and metatarsophalangeal joints during normal walking.
Methods: Kinematics and contact data from four healthy individuals during walking were registered with a three-dimensional motion analysis system and a pressure platform. Stance phases with flexion moment-angle linear relationships were identified, and dynamic stiffnesses were calculated from the slope of their linear regressions. Intraparticipant repeatability was analyzed using analyses of variance, and interparticipant variability was checked through the SD of averaged participant stiffnesses.
Results: Flexion moment-angle linear relationships were identified (R2 > 0.98) during the early and late midstance phases and the propulsion phase at the ankle (2.76, 5.23, and 3.42 N·m/kg/rad, respectively) and midtarsal (15.88, 3.90, and 4.64 N·m/kg/rad, respectively) joints. At the metatarsophalangeal joint, a linear relationship (R2 > 0.96) occurred only during the propulsion phase (0.11 N·m/kg/rad). High dynamic stiffness variability was observed during the late and early midstance phases at the ankle and midtarsal joints, respectively.
Conclusions: These results may serve as a basis for future studies aimed at investigating the role of dynamic stiffness identified herein in different foot disorders. The importance of properly controlling the samples in such studies is highlighted. Study of the dynamic stiffnesses identified might be used in the design of prostheses, orthoses, and other assistive devices.