• 1

    American Diabetes Association: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 35: S64, 2012.

  • 2

    International Diabetes Federation: Diabetes Education: A Right for All, International Diabetes Federation, Brussels, 2004.

  • 3

    Thomas D: Commentary. Int J Ther Rehabil 6: 18, 2011.

  • 4

    Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM: Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 24: 561, 2001.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Ellis SE, Speroff T, Dittus RS, et al: Diabetes patient education: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Patient Educ Couns 52: 97, 2004.

  • 6

    Tankova T, Dakovska G, Koev D: Education and quality of life in diabetic patients. Patient Educ Couns 53: 285, 2004.

  • 7

    Formosa C, Lucas K, Mandy A, et al: Influence of national culture on diabetes education in Malta: a case example. Diabetes Primary Care 10: 109, 2008.

  • 8

    Davies MJ, Heller S, Skinner TC, et al: Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self-management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ 336: 491, 2008.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Siminerio LM: The diabetes education renaissance. Diabetes Spectrum 19: 276, 2006.

  • 10

    Emerson S: Implementing diabetes self-management education in primary care. Diabetes Spectrum 19: 79, 2006.

  • 11

    Casagrande SS, Burrows NR, Geis LS, et al: Diabetes knowledge and its relationship with achieving treatment recommended in a national sample of people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 35: 1556, 2012.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    American Association of Diabetes Educators: Guidelines for the practice of diabetes education. Available at: www.diabeteseducator.org/search-results/?q=diabetes%20education%20guidelines Accessed January 30, 2014.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    International Diabetes Federation: Position Statement: The Diabetic Foot, International Diabetes Federation, Brussels, 2009.

  • 14

    National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Type 2 diabetes: NICE guidelines [CG66]. Available at: http ://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/cg66niceguideline .pdf. Published May 2008. Accessed March 4, 2014.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Formosa C, Vella L: Influence of diabetes-related knowledge on foot ulceration. J Diabetes Nurs 16: 111, 2012.

  • 16

    Rankin D, Heller S, Lawton J: Understanding information and education gaps among people with type 1 diabetes. Patient Educ Couns 83: 87, 2011.

  • 17

    US Department of Health and Human Services: Healthy people 2020: improving the health of Americans. Available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicId=8. Accessed February 2, 2014.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Visser A, Deccache A, Bensing J: Patient education in Europe: united differences. Patient Educ Couns 44: 1, 2001.

  • 19

    Strine TW, Okoro CA, Chapman DP, et al: The impact of formal diabetes education on the preventive health practices and behaviours of persons with type 2 diabetes. Prev Med 41: 79, 2005.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Klein HA, Jackson SM, Street K, et al: Diabetes self-management and education: miles to go. Nurs Res Pract 2013: 581012, 2013.

  • 21

    Formosa C, Gatt A, Chockalingam N: The importance of diabetes foot care education in a primary care setting. J Diabetes Nurs 16: 410, 2012.

  • 22

    World Health Organization: Use of Glycated Haemoglobin in the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2011.

  • 23

    World Medical Association: World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects . Available at: http ://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c .pdf. Published October 2008. Accessed February 2, 2014.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Garcia AA, Villagomez ET, Brown SA: The Starr County Diabetes Education Study: development of the Spanish-language diabetes knowledge questionnaire. Diabetes Care 24: 16, 2001.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Frosch D, Porzsolt F, Heicappell R, et al: Comparison of German language versions of the QWB-SA and SF-36 evaluating outcomes for patients with prostate disease. Qual Life Res 10: 165, 2001.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE: The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care 23: 943, 2000.

  • 27

    Saeed N, Zafar J, Atta A: Frequency of patients with diabetes taking proper foot care according to international guidelines and its impact on their foot health. J Pak Med Assoc 60: 732, 2010.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Gopichandran V, Lyndon S, Angel MK, et al: Diabetes self-care activities: a community-based survey in urban southern India. Natl Med J India 25: 14, 2012.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Shrivastava SR, Shrivastava PS, Ramasamy J: Role of self-care in management of diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Metab Disord 12: 14, 2013.

  • 30

    Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, et al: Group-based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: CD003417, 2005.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Harvey JN, Lawson VL: The importance of health belief models in determining self-care behavior in diabetes. Diabet Med 26: 5, 2009.

  • 32

    Sowattanangoon N, Kotchabhakdi N, Petrie KJ: The influence of Thai culture on diabetes perceptions and management. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 84: 245, 2009.

  • 33

    Funnell MM, Brown TL, Childs BP, et al: National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care 34(suppl 1): S89, 2008.

  • 34

    Anderson RM: Taking diabetes self-management education to the next level. Diabetes Spectrum 20: 4, 2007.

  • 35

    Duke Clinical Research Institute: Diabetes knowledge has little effect on improving outcomes . Available at: http://www.news-medical.net/?id=10666. Published June 3, 2005. Accessed May 28, 2013.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Improving Diabetes Knowledge and Self-Care Practices

Cynthia Formosa Department of Podiatry, University of Malta, 14, Faculty of Health Sciences, Msida, Malta.

Search for other papers by Cynthia Formosa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
and
Ryan Muscat Department of Podiatry, University of Malta, 14, Faculty of Health Sciences, Msida, Malta.

Search for other papers by Ryan Muscat in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BSc

Background:

This study sought to identify the nature and extent of diabetes-related knowledge and self-care practices in people living with type 2 diabetes who attend primary-care clinics and to determine whether a correlation between the two exists.

Methods:

In a nonexperimental prospective study, the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire and the Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities were used to assess knowledge and self-management in 50 patients.

Results:

The mean diabetes knowledge score was 14.40 out of a total of 24 and the mean self-care activities score was 2.89 out of a total of 7, indicating a deficit in a number of key areas in the management of diabetes. There was no statistically significant correlation between diabetes knowledge score and diabetes self-care activities (r = 0.190, P = 0.187). On analysis of the individual subscales, a significant relationship resulted between diabetes knowledge score and diet (r = 0.324, P = 0.022) but physical activity (r = 0.179, P = 0.214), blood sugar testing (r = 0.231, P = 0.107) and footcare (r = 0.189, P = 0.189) gave no significant results. On further analysis, education level was significantly correlated to diabetes knowledge score (r = 0.374, P = 0.007) and self-care activities score (r = 0.317, P = 0.025) while age was significantly correlated to diabetes knowledge score (P = 0.008) and self-care activities score (P = 0.035).

Conclusions:

Integrating theories of behavior change into educational interventions at the primary-care level may translate to improved care, reduced long-term complications, and better quality of life.

Corresponding author: Cynthia Formosa, PhD, Department of Podiatry, University of Malta, 14, Faculty of Health Sciences, Msida, msd 2080, Malta. (E-mail: cynthia.formosa@um.edu.mt)
Save