Advertisement
-
1
Hansen A, Jensen DV, Larsen E, et al: Relaxin is not related to symptom-giving pelvic girdle relaxation in pregnant women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 75: 245, 1996.
-
2
Bullock JE, Jull GA, Bullock MI: The relationship of low back pain to postural changes during pregnancy. J Physiother 33: 10, 1987.
-
3
Whitcome K, Shapiro LJ, Lieberman DE: Fetal load and the evolution of lumbar lordosis in bipedal hominins. Nature 450: 1075, 2007.
-
4
Franklin ME, Conner-Kerr T: An analysis of posture and back pain in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28: 133, 1998.
-
5
Alvarez R, Stokes IA, Asprinio DE, et al: Dimensional changes of the feet in pregnancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70: 271, 1988.
-
6
Segal NA, Boyer ER, Teran-Yengle P, et al: Pregnancy leads to lasting changes in foot structure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 92: 232, 2013.
-
7
Block RA, Hess LA, Timpano EV, et al: Physiologic changes in the foot during pregnancy. JAPMA 75: 297, 1985.
-
8
Nyska M, Sofer D, Porat A, et al: Planter foot pressures in pregnant women. Isr J Med Sci 33: 139, 1997.
-
9
Bird AR, Menz HB, Hyde CC: The effect of pregnancy on footprint parameters: a prospective investigation. JAPMA 89: 405, 1999.
-
10
Birtane M, Tuna H: The evaluation of plantar pressure distribution in obese and non-obese adults. Clin Biomech 19: 1055, 2004.
-
11
Abrams B, Parker JD: Maternal weight gain in women with good pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 76: 1, 1990.
-
12
Abrams B, Selvin S: Maternal weight gain pattern and birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 86: 163, 1995.
-
13
Björklund K, Bergström S, Nordström ML, et al: Symphyseal distention in relation to serum relaxin levels and pelvic pain in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79: 269, 2000.
-
14
Goldberg J, Besser MP, Selby-Silverstein L: Changes in foot function throughout pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 97: S39, 2001.
-
15
Gaymer C, Whalley H, Achten J, et al: Midfoot plantar pressure significantly increases during late gestation. Foot 19: 114, 2009.
-
16
Lymbery JK, Gilleard W: The stance phase of walking during late pregnancy: temporospatial and ground reaction force variables. JAPMA 95: 247, 2005.
-
17
Forczek W, Staszkiewicz R: Changes of kinematic gait parameters due to pregnancy. Acta Bioeng Biomech 14: 113, 2012.
-
18
Titianova EB, Mateev PS, Tarkka IM: Footprint analysis of gait using a pressure sensor system. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 14: 275, 2004.
-
19
Mitternacht J, Klement A, Lampe R: Plantar pressure distribution during and after pregnancy. Eur Orthop Traumatol 4: 229, 2013.
-
20
The GAITRite Electronic Walkway: Measurements and Definitions, CIR System Inc, Sparta, NJ, 2006.
-
21
Hills AP, Parker AW: Locomotor characteristics of obese children. Child Care Health Dev 18: 29, 1992.
-
22
Foti T, Davids JR, Bagley A: A biomechanical analysis of gait during pregnancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82: 625, 2000.
-
23
Hills AP, Hennig EM, McDonald M, et al: Plantar pressure differences between obese and non-obese adults: a biomechanical analysis. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25: 1674, 2001.
Plantar Pressure During Gait in Pregnant Women
Background: During pregnancy, physical and hormonal modifications occur. Morphologic alterations of the feet are found. These observations can induce alterations in plantar pressure. This study sought to investigate plantar pressures during gait in the last 4 months of pregnancy and in the postpartum period. A comparison with nulliparous women was conducted to investigate plantar pressure modifications during pregnancy.
Methods: Fifty-eight women in the last 4 months of pregnancy, nine postpartum women, and 23 healthy nonpregnant women (control group) performed gait trials on an electronic walkway at preferred speeds. The results for the three groups were compared using analysis of variance.
Results: During pregnancy, peak pressure and contact area decreased for the forefoot and rearfoot. These parameters increased significantly for the midfoot. The gait strategy seemed to be lateralization of gait with an increased contact area of the lateral midfoot and both reduced pressure and a later peak time on the medial forefoot. In the postpartum group, footprint parameters were modified compared with the pregnant group, indicating a trend toward partial return to control values, although differences persisted between the postpartum and control groups.
Conclusions: Pregnant women had altered plantar pressures during gait. These findings could define a specific pattern of gait footprints in late pregnancy because plantar pressures had characteristics that could maintain a stable and safe gait.
