Chimera NJ, Castro M, Davis I, et al: The effect of isolated gastrocnemius contracture and gastrocnemius recession on lower extremity kinematics and kinetics during stance. Clin Biomech27: 917, 2012.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.06.010)| false
Johanson MA, Cuda BJ, Koontz JE, et al: Effect of stretching on ankle and knee angles and gastrocnemius activity during the stance phase of gait. J Sport Rehabil18: 521, 2009.10.1123/jsr.18.4.52120108853)| false
Johanson MA, Wooden M, Catlin PA, et al: Effects of gastrocnemius stretching on ankle dorsiflexion and time-to heel-off during the stance phase of gait. Phys Ther Sport7: 93, 2006.10.1016/j.ptsp.2006.02.002)| false
Kang MH, Kim JW, Choung SD, et al: Immediate effect of walking with talus-stabilizing taping on ankle kinematics in subjects with limited ankle dorsiflexion. Phys Ther Sport15: 156, 2014.10.1016/j.ptsp.2013.09.00124239168)| false
Selby-Silverstein L, Farrett WDJr, Maurer BT, et al: Gait analysis and bivalved serial casting of an athlete with shortened gastrocnemius muscles: a single case design. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther25: 282, 1997.
Selby-Silverstein L, Farrett WDJr, Maurer BT, et al: Gait analysis and bivalved serial casting of an athlete with shortened gastrocnemius muscles: a single case design. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther25: 282, 1997.10.2519/jospt.19184.108.40.20629083948)| false
Munteanu SE, Strawhorn AB, Landorf KB, et al: A weightbearing technique for the measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion with the knee extended is reliable. J Sci Med Sport12: 54, 2009.1788873310.1016/j.jsams.2007.06.009)| false
Johanson M, Baer J, Hovermale H, et al: Subtalar joint position during gastrocnemius stretching and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. J Athl Train43: 172, 2008.10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.17218345342)| false
Whitting JW, Steele JR, McGhee DE, et al: Passive dorsiflexion stiffness is poorly correlated with passive dorsiflexion range of motion. J Sci Med Sport16: 157, 2013.2274323810.1016/j.jsams.2012.05.016)| false
Measurement of weightbearing ankle dorsiflexion (DF) passive range of motion (PROM) has been suggested as a way to estimate ankle kinematics during gait; however, no previous study has demonstrated the relationship between ankle DF during gait and ankle DF PROM with knee extension. We examine the relationship between maximum ankle DF during gait and nonweightbearing and weightbearing ankle DF PROM with knee extension.
Forty physically active individuals (mean ± SD age, 21.63 ± 1.73 years) participated in this study. Ankle DF PROM with knee extension was measured in the nonweightbearing and weightbearing conditions; maximum ankle DF during gait was assessed using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. The relationship between each variable was calculated using the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient, and the difference in ankle DF PROM between the nonweightbearing and weightbearing conditions was analyzed using a paired t test.
The weightbearing measurement (r = 0.521; P < .001) for ankle DF PROM showed a greater correlation with maximum ankle DF during gait than did the nonweightbearing measurement (r = 0.245; P = .029). Ankle DF PROM was significantly greater in the weightbearing than in the nonweightbearing condition (P < .001) despite a significant correlation between the two measurements (r = 0.402; P < .001).
These findings indicate that nonweightbearing and weightbearing measurements of ankle DF PROM with knee extension should not be used interchangeably and that weightbearing ankle DF PROM with the knee extended is more appropriate for estimating ankle DF during gait.
Corresponding author: Jae-Seop Oh, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy, Inje University, 197 Inje-ro, Gimhae-si, 621-749, Republic of Korea. (E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org)