Prompers L, Schaper N, Apelqvist J, et al: Prediction of outcome in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: focus on the differences between individuals with or without peripheral arterial disease: the EURODIALE study. Diabetologia 5: 747, 2008.
Boulton AJM, Vileikyte L, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, et al: The global burden of diabetic foot disease. Lancet 366: 1721, 2005.
Karlock L: Examining the evidence for preventing diabetic foot ulcers. Podiatry Today 21: 37, 2008.
Jeffcoate WJ, Chipchase SY, Ince P, et al: Assessing the outcome of the management of diabetic foot ulcers using ulcer-related and person-related measures. Diabetes Care 29: 1784, 2006.
Diabetes. World Health Organization Web site. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs312/en. Accessed September 20, 2012.
Diabetes. International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot Web site. Available at: http://www.iwgdf.org. Accessed September 5, 2012.
Diabetes and foot care: put feet first: prevent amputations. International Diabetes Federation Web site. Available at: http://www.idf.org/idf-wpr-bangkok. Accessed September 10, 2012.
Gershater MA, Londahl M, Nyberg P, et al: Complexity of factors related to outcome of neuropathic and neuroischaemic/ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers: a cohort study. Diabetologia 52: 398, 2009.
Apelqvist J, Bakker K, Van Houtum WH, et al: Practical guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot: based upon the International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 24: S181, 2008.
Ince P, Kendrick D, Game F, et al: The association between baseline characteristics and the outcome of foot lesions in a UK population with diabetes. Diabet Med 24: 977, 2007.
Sheenan P, Jones P, Caselli A, et al: Percent change in wound area of diabetic foot ulcers over a 4-week period is a robust predictor of complete healing in a 12-week prospective trial. Diabetes Care 26: 1879, 2003.
Pham H, Falanga V, Sabolonski ML, et al: Healing rate measurement can predict complete wound healing rate in chronic diabetic foot ulceration. Diabetologia 43: 197, 2000.
Warriner RA, Snyder RJ, Cardinal MH: Differentiating diabetic foot ulcers that are unlikely to heal by 12 weeks following achieving 50% percent area reduction at 4 weeks. Int Wound J 8: 632, 2011.
Beckert S, Witte M, Wicke C, et al: New wound-based severities score for diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective analysis of 1,000 patients. Diabetes Care 29: 988, 2006.
Apelqvist J, Castenfors J, Larsson J, et al: Wound classification is more important than site of ulceration in the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabet Med 6: 526, 1989.
Oyibo SO, Jude EB, Tarawneh I, et al: The effects of ulcer size and site, patient's age, sex and type and duration of diabetes on the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabet Med 18: 133, 2001.
Larsson J, Agardh CD, Apelqvist J, et al: Long-term prognosis after healed amputation in patients with diabetes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 350: 149, 1998.
Apelqvist J, Agardh CD: The association between clinical risk factors and outcome of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 18: 43, 1992.
Boulton AJ, Kirsner RS, Vileikyte L: Clinical practice: neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. N Engl J Med 351: 48, 2004.
Rocchiccioli JT, O'Donoghue CR, Buttigieg S: Diabetes in Malta: current findings and future trends. Malta Med J 17: 16, 2005.
Galea AM, Springett K, Bungay H, et al: Incidence and location of diabetic foot ulcer recurrence. Diabet Foot J 12: 181, 2009.
Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. World Health Organization Web site. Available at: http://www.who.int/diabetes/publications/report-hba1c_2011.pdf. Accessed February 20, 2013.
Pham H, Armstrong DG, Harvey C: Screening techniques to identify people at high risk for diabetic foot ulceration. Diabetes Care 23: 606, 2000.
American Diabetes Association: Peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes. Diabetes Care 26: 3333, 2003.
Gethin GT, Cowman S: Wound measurement: the contribution to practice. Eur Wound Manage Assoc J 7: 26, 2007.
Keast DH, Bowering K, Evans W, et al: Measure: a proposed assessment framework for developing best practice recommendations for wound assessment. Wound Repair Regen 12: S1, 2004.
Merriman LM, Turner W, eds: Assessment of the Lower Limb, 2nd Ed, Elsevier Science Ltd, Edinburgh, 2002.
Yesil S, Akinci B, Yener S, et al: Predictors of amputation in diabetics with foot ulcer: single center experience in a large Turkish cohort. Hormones 8: 286, 2009.
Zubair M, Malik A, Ahmad J: Incidence, risk factors for amputation among patients with diabetic foot ulcer in a North Indian tertiary care hospital. Foot 22: 24, 2012.
Moffatt CJ, Doherty DC, Smithdale R, et al: Clinical predictors of leg ulcer healing. Br J Dermatol 162: 51, 2010.
Apelqvist J, Elgzyri T, Larsson J, et al: Factors related to outcome of neuroischemic/ischemic foot ulcer in diabetic patients. J Vasc Surg 53: 1582, 2011.
Christman AL, Selvin E, Margolis DJ, et al: Hemoglobin A1c predicts healing rate in diabetic wounds. J Invest Dermatol 131: 2121, 2011.
Vowden P, Apelqvist J, Moffat C: “Wound Complexity and Healing,” in Position Document: Hard-to-Heal Wounds: A Holistic Approach, EWMA, edited by S Calne, p 2, Medical Education Partnership, London, 2008.
Harding KG, Moore K, Phillips TJ: Wound chronicity and fibroblast senescence-implications for treatment. Int Wound J 2: 364, 2005.
Van Damme H, Limet R: The diabetic foot [in French]. Rev Med Liege 60: 516, 2005.
We sought to determine patient and ulcer characteristics that predict wound healing in patients living with diabetes.
A prospective observational study was conducted on 99 patients presenting with diabetic foot ulceration. Patient and ulcer characteristics were recorded. Patients were followed up for a maximum of 1 year.
After 1 year of follow-up, ulcer characteristics were more predictive of ulcer healing than were patient characteristics. Seventy-seven percent of ulcers had healed and 23% had not healed. Independent predictors of nonhealing were ulcer stage (P = .003), presence of biofilm (P = .020), and ulcer depth (P = .028). Although this study demonstrated that the baseline hemoglobin A1c reading at the start of the study was not a significant predictor of foot ulcer outcome (P = .603, resolved versus amputated), on further statistical analyses, when hemoglobin A1c was compared with the time taken for complete ulcer healing (n = 77), it proved to be significant (P = .009).
The factors influencing healing are ulcer stage, presence of biofilm, and ulcer depth. These findings have important implications for clinical practice, especially in an outpatient setting. Prediction of outcome may be helpful for health-care professionals in individualizing and optimizing clinical assessment and management of patients. Identification of determinants of outcome could result in improved health outcomes, improved quality of life, and fewer diabetes-related foot complications.