• 1

    Neufeld SK, Cerrato R: Plantar fasciitis: evaluation and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16: 338, 2008.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Atkins D, Crawford F, Edwards J et al: A systematic review of treatments for the painful heel. Rheumatology 38: 968, 1999.

  • 3

    Irving DB, Cook JL, Young MA, et al: Impact of chronic plantar heel pain on health-related quality of life. JAPMA 98: 283, 2008.

  • 4

    Tong KB, Furia J: Economic burden of plantar fasciitis treatment in the United States. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 39: 227, 2010.

  • 5

    Hicks JH: The mechanics of the foot: II. The plantar aponeurosis and the arch. J Anat 88: 25, 1954.

  • 6

    Fabrikant JM, Park TS: Plantar fasciitis (fasciosis) treatment outcomes study: plantar fascia thickness measured by ultrasound and correlated with patient self-reported improvement. Foot (Edinb) 21: 79, 2011.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Gordon R, Wong C, Crawford EJ: Ultrasonographic evaluation of low energy extracorporeal pulse activated therapy (EPAT) for chronic plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int 33: 202, 2012.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    McMillan AM, Landorf KB, Barrett JT, et al: Diagnostic imaging for chronic plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res 2: 40, 2011.

    • Crossref
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Davis PF, Severud E, Baxter DE: Painful heel syndrome: results of nonoperative treatment. Foot Ankle Int 15: 531, 1994.

  • 10

    Cardinal E, Chhem RK, Beauregard CG, et al: Plantar fasciitis: sonographic evaluation. Radiology 201: 257, 1996.

  • 11

    Tsai WC, Chiu MF, Wang CL, et al: Ultrasound evaluation of plantar fasciitis. Scand J Rheumatol 29: 255, 2000.

  • 12

    Wall JR, Harkness MA, Crawford A: Ultrasound diagnosis of plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int 14: 465, 1993.

  • 13

    Vohra PK, Kincaid BR, Japour CJ, et al: Ultrasonographic evaluation of plantar fascia bands: a retrospective study of 211 symptomatic feet. JAPMA 92: 444, 2002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Kane D, Greaney T, Shanahan M, et al: The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of idiopathic plantar fasciitis. Rheumatology 40: 1002, 2001.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Mahowald S, Legge BS, Grady JF: The correlation between plantar fascia thickness and symptoms of plantar fasciitis. JAPMA 101: 385, 2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Thomson CE, Crawford F, Murray GD: The effectiveness of extra corporeal shock wave therapy for plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 6: 19, 2005.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Boyle RA, Slater GL: Endoscopic plantar fascia release: a case series. Foot Ankle Int 24: 176, 2003.

  • 18

    Kamel M, Kotob H: High frequency ultrasonographic findings in plantar fasciitis and assessment of local steroid injection. J Rheumatol 27: 2139, 2000.

  • 19

    Saber N, Diab H, Nassar W, et al: Ultrasound guided local steroid injection versus extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Alexandria J Med 48: 35, 2012.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Sabir N, Demirlenk S, Yagci B, et al: Clinical utility of sonography in diagnosing plantar fasciitis. J Ultrasound Med 24: 1041, 2005.

  • 21

    Huang YC, Wang LY, Wang HC, et al: The relationship between the flexible flatfoot and plantar fasciitis: ultrasonographic evaluation. Chang Gung Med J 27: 443, 2004.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Groshar D, Alperson M, Toubi A, et al: Plantar fasciitis: detection with ultrasonography versus bone scintigraphy. The Foot 10: 164, 2000.

  • 23

    Hardy MA: The biology of scar formation. Phys Ther 69: 22, 1989.

Retrospective Analysis of Plantar Fascia by Ultrasound Imaging in Patients with Plantar Fasciitis

View More View Less
  • 1 Guided Therapy Systems LLC, Mesa, AZ.
  • | 2 Centro Clínico Quirúrgico, Cirugía del Pie, Odontología y Fisioterapia, Vigo, Spain.
Restricted access

Background:

We compared diagnostic ultrasound images of the plantar fascia with available patient histories for symptomatic patients previously diagnosed as having plantar fasciitis. Plantar fascia thickness and depth, the prevalence of perifascial hypoechoic lesions, and injury timelines in patients were reviewed.

Methods:

Images and histories for 126 symptomatic patients were collected from a patient database. We documented plantar fascia depth and thickness and the visualization of hypoechoic perifascial lesions. After image analysis, the obtained plantar fascia thickness measurements were compared with various patient attributes for possible relationships, including age, weight, and body mass index. In addition, plantar fascia thickness measurements were separated based on injury timeline as well as symptomatic/asymptomatic foot for patients with unilateral conditions to check for significant differences between subgroups. These were, in turn, compared with a control group of 71 individuals with no heel pain or diagnosis of plantar fasciitis.

Results:

Overall, mean ± SD symptomatic thickness (n = 148) was 6.53 ± 1.56 mm. Mean ± SD symptomatic depth (n = 136) was 13.36 ± 2.14 mm. For the control group, mean ± SD thickness was 3.20 ± 0.66 mm and depth was 10.30 ± 2.00 mm. Comparison of thickness based on injury timeline showed two significant differences: acute injuries (≤3 months) are significantly thicker than chronic injuries (>3 months), and only acute symptomatic thicknesses are significantly different from their asymptomatic thickness counterparts. Age, weight, and body mass index did not show significant correlations to thickness. Analysis of ultrasound images showed that 93% of symptomatic feet had hypoechoic lesions.

Conclusions:

Injury timeline and the presence of hypoechoic lesions may play important roles in patient discomfort, diagnosis, and treatment of plantar fasciitis.

Corresponding author: Michael Henry Slayton, PhD, Guided Therapy Systems LLC, 33 S Sycamore St, Mesa, AZ 85202. (E-mail: mhs@guidedtherapy.com)