Evans D: Calcaneo-valgus deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Br 57: 270, 1975.
Protzman NM , Wobst GM & Storts EC et al.: Mid-calcaneal length after Evans calcaneal osteotomy: a retrospective comparison of wedge locking plates and tricortical allograft wedges. J Foot Ankle Surg 54: 900, 2015.
Dunn SP & Meyer J: Displacement of the anterior process of the calcaneus after Evans calcaneal osteotomy. J Foot Ankle Surg 50: 402, 2011.
Prissel MA & Roukis TS: Incidence of nonunion of the unfixated, isolated Evans calcaneal osteotomy: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg 51: 323, 2012.
Dayton P , Prins DB & Smith DE et al.: Effectiveness of a locking plate in preserving midcalcaneal length and positional outcome after Evans calcaneal osteotomy: a retrospective pilot study. J Foot Ankle Surg 52: 710, 2013.
Abbasian A , Zaidi R & Guha A et al.: Comparison of three different fixation methods of calcaneal osteotomies. Foot Ankle Int 34: 420, 2013.
DiDomenico LA , Haro AA & Cross DJ: Double calcaneal osteotomy using single, dual function screw fixation technique. J Foot Ankle Surg 50: 773, 2011.
Boffeli TJ & Abben KW: Double calcaneal osteotomy with percutaneous Steinmann pin fixation as part of treatment for flexible flatfoot deformity: a review of consecutive cases highlighting our experience with pin fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg 54: 478, 2015.
Penney NT , Viselli SJ & Holmes TR et al.: Double-calcaneal osteotomy with a unilateral rail external fixator for correction of pes planus. Foot Ankle Spec 2: 194, 2009.
Weinraub GM & Daulat R: The Evans osteotomy: technique and fixation with cortical bone pin. J Foot Ankle Surg 40: 54, 2001.
Chan JY , Greenfield ST & Soukup DS et al.: Contribution of lateral column lengthening to correction of forefoot abduction in stage IIb adult acquired flatfoot deformity reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 36: 400, 2015.
Mosier-Laclair S , Pomeroy G & Manoli A: Operative treatment of the difficult stage 2 adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Clin 6: 95, 2001.
Pomeroy GC & Manoli A: A new operative approach for flatfoot secondary to posterior tibial tendon insufficiency: a preliminary report. Foot Ankle Int 18: 206, 1997.
Raines RA Jr, & Brage ME: Evans osteotomy in the adult foot: an anatomic study of structures at risk. Foot Ankle Int 19: 743, 1998.
Abbasian A , Zaidi R & Guha A et al.: Comparison of three different fixation methods of calcaneal osteotomies. Foot Ankle Int 34: 420, 2013.
Haeseker GA , Mureau MA , Faber FWM : Lateral column lengthening for acquired adult flatfoot deformity caused by posterior tibial tendon dysfunction stage II: a retrospective comparison of calcaneus osteotomy with calcaneocuboid distraction arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg 49: 380, 2010.
Harvey EJ , Grujic L & Early JS et al.: Morbidity associated with ORIF of intra-articular calcaneus fractures using a lateral approach. Foot Ankle Int 22: 868, 2001.
Baumhauer JF & O'Connor K: Are foot and ankle problems worse for women? Available at: http://www.aaos.org/news/aaosnow/mar08/clinical2.asp. [Member-only document].
Wunderlich RE & Cavanagh PR: Gender differences in adult foot shape: implications for shoe design. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33: 605, 2001.
Frey C: Shoes designed specifically for women's feet usually fit best: helping the athletic woman find a shoe that fits. J Musculoskelet Med 15: 35, 1998.
Catanzariti AR , Mendicino RW & Maskill RP: “Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction,” in Southerland JT, Downey MS, Boberg JS, et al, eds: McGlamry's Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 4th Ed, p 640, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, September 2012.
The Evans osteotomy is a widely used procedure for the correction of adult and pediatric flexible flatfoot deformity. Locking plates are commonly used to stabilize the osteotomy and the allograft. However, there have been incidences of soft-tissue irritation caused by the hardware, requiring subsequent hardware removal. Therefore, we sought to review whether age, sex, or laterality of the procedure had any correlation with the rate of hardware removal.
A retrospective review was performed of 47 consecutive patients who underwent an Evans calcaneal osteotomy between October 1, 2013, and October 1, 2016. Data were collected and analyzed based on age, sex, laterality, and the need for hardware removal.
All of the 47 patients met the inclusion criteria. Seventy procedures were performed, and hardware removal was required in 16 patients and 21 feet (30%). The only statistically significant finding was that 11 females and only five males required either unilateral or bilateral hardware removal (P = .039). All 16 patients reported complete pain relief after hardware removal.
Females are twice as likely as males to develop symptoms after locking plate application over an Evans osteotomy and may require hardware removal. Despite the low-profile nature of the locking plate to fixate the Evans osteotomy, the hardware can be a source of significant pain. Patients, especially females, should be cautioned about potential hardware-related pain and a possible follow-up procedure to remove the hardware.