• 1.

    Taylor BC. , French BG. & Fowler TT. et al.: Induced membrane technique for reconstruction to manage bone loss. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20: 142, 2012.

  • 2.

    Pelissier P. , Boireau P. & Martin D. et al.: Bone reconstruction of the lower extremity: complications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 111: 2223, 2003.

  • 3.

    Stafford PR. & Norris BL. Reamer-irrigator-aspirator bone graft and bi Masquelet technique for segmental bone defect nonunions: a review of 25 cases. Injury 41 (suppl) : S72, 2010.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Myeroff C. & Archdeacon M. Autogenous bone graft: donor sites and techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93: 2227, 2011.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    DeCoster TA. , Gehlert RJ. & Mikola EA. et al.: Management of posttraumatic segmental bone defects. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12: 28, 2004.

  • 6.

    Gaskill TR. , Urbaniak JR. & Aldridge JM III. Free vascularized fibular transfer for femoral head osteonecrosis: donor site and graft site morbidity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91: 1861, 2009.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Khan SN. , Cammisa FP. & Harvinder SS. et al.: The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13: 77, 2005.

  • 8.

    Micev AJ. , Kalainov DM. & Soneru AP. Masquelet technique for treatment of segmental bone loss in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am 40: 593, 2015.

  • 9.

    Masquelet AC. , Fitoussi F. & Bégué T. et al.: Reconstruction of long bones induced membrane and spongy autograft [in French]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 45: 346, 2000.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Masquelet AC. Muscle reconstruction in reconstructive surgery: soft tissue repair and long bone reconstruction. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388: 344, 2003.

  • 11.

    Azi ML. , Teixeira A. & Cotias RB. et al.: Membrane induced osteogenesis in the management of post-traumatic bone defects. J Orthop Trauma 30: 545, 2016.

  • 12.

    Kargera C. , Kishi T. & Schneidera L. et al.: Treatment of posttraumatic bone defects by the induced membrane technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98: 97, 2012.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Giannoudis PV. , Faour O. & Goff T. et al.: Masquelet technique for the treatment of bone defects: tips-tricks and future directions. Injury 42: 591, 2011.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Pelissier P. , Masquelet AC. & Bareille R. et al.: Induced membranes secrete growth factors including vascular and osteoinductive factors and could stimulate bone regeneration. J Orthop Res 22: 73, 2004.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Tan HB. , Cuthbert RJ. & Jones E. et al.: The Masquelet technique induces the formation of a mesenchymal stem cell-rich periosteum-like membrane. Orthop Proc 95 (suppl 16) : 22, 2013.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Reconstruction of a Traumatic Partial First-Ray Amputation with the Use of an Induced Pseudosynovial Membrane and Corticocancellous Autograft

A Case Report

Nathaniel L. P. Preston Grant Medical Center Foot and Ankle Surgery Residency Program, Columbus, OH.

Search for other papers by Nathaniel L. P. Preston in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DPM
,
Trevor E. Black Grant Medical Center Foot and Ankle Surgery Residency Program, Columbus, OH.
Southeast Permanente Foot and Ankle Trauma and Reconstructive Fellowship, Atlanta, GA.

Search for other papers by Trevor E. Black in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DPM
, and
Randall C. Thomas Grant Medical Center Foot and Ankle Surgery Residency Program, Columbus, OH.
Private practice, Clintonville Foot and Ankle, Columbus, OH.

Search for other papers by Randall C. Thomas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DPM

Reconstruction of large bone defects of the metatarsals, whether resulting from trauma, infection, or a neoplastic process, can be especially challenging when attempting to maintain an anatomical parabola and basic biomechanical stability of the forefoot. We present the case of a 42-year-old man with no significant medical history who presented to the emergency department following a severe lawnmower injury to the left forefoot resulting in a large degloving type injury along the medial aspect of the left first ray extending to the level of the medial malleolus. The patient underwent emergent debridement with application of antibiotic bone cement, external fixation, and a negative-pressure dressing. He was subsequently treated with split-thickness skin graft and iliac crest tricortical autograft using a locking plate construct for reconstruction of the distal first ray. Although the patient failed to advance to radiographic osseous union, clinically there was no motion at the attempted fusion site and no pain with ambulation, suggestive of a pseudoarthrosis. The patient has since progressed to full nonpainful weightbearing in regular shoes and has returned to normal activities of daily living. The patient returned to his preinjury level of work and has had complete resolution of all wounds including his split-thickness skin graft donor site. This case shows the potential efficacy of the Masquelet technique for spanning significant traumatic bone defects of the metatarsals involving complete loss of the metatarsophalangeal joint.

Corresponding author: Nathaniel L. P. Preston, DPM, PSC 482 Box 2511, FPO, AP 96362. (E-mail: preston.nate@gmail.com)
Save