• 1. 

    Spagnioli A & Rosenfeld RG: The mechanisms by which growth hormone brings about growth: the relative contributions of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factors. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 25 : 615, 1996.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. 

    Wood Jones F: The Foot , Baillière Tindall and Cox, London, 1944.

  • 3. 

    Dubowitz LM , Dubowitz V & Goldberg C. Clinical assessment of gestational age in the newborn infant. J Pediatr 77 : 1, 1970.

  • 4. 

    Kavurt S , Celik IH & Ada BS et al.: Isolated ectrodactyly in a newborn with Down syndrome. Genet Couns 25 : 209, 2014.

  • 5. 

    Mankin HJ , Jupiter J & Trahan CA: Hand and foot abnormalities associated with genetic diseases. Hand 6 : 18, 2011.

  • 6. 

    Malik S: Syndactyly: phenotypes, genetics and current classification. Eur J Hum Genet 20 : 817, 2012.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. 

    Sezer O , Gebesoglu I & Yuan B et al.: Fibular aplasia, tibial campomelia, and oligosyndactyly: a further patient with a 2-year follow-up. Clin Dysmorphol 23 : 121, 2014.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. 

    Miller M & Dobbs MB: Congenital vertical talus: etiology and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 23 : 604, 2015.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. 

    Khader A & Huntley JS: Congenital vertical talus in Cri du Chat syndrome: a case report. BMC Res Notes 6 : 270, 2013.

  • 10. 

    Vukasinovic ZS , Slavkovic NS & Zivkovic ZM et al.: Congenital club foot [in Serbian]. Acta Chir Iugosl 57 : 73, 2010.

  • 11. 

    Radler C: The Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital club foot: review of the current literature and treatment recommendations. Int Orthop 37 : 1747, 2013.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. 

    Ponseti IV & Smoley EN: The classic: congenital club foot: the results of treatment. 1963. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 : 1133, 2009.

  • 13. 

    Jordan RP & Caselli MA: Overlapping deformity of the digits in the pediatric patient: a conservative approach to treatment. JAPA 68 : 503, 1978.

  • 14. 

    Talusan PG , Milewski MD & Reach JS Jr: Fifth toe deformities: overlapping and underlapping toe. Foot Ankle Spec 6 : 145, 2013.

  • 15. 

    Cho J , Park J & Kim J et al.: Congenital curly toe of the fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24 : 417, 2004.

  • 16. 

    van Gijn J: Reflexes de defense. By J. Babinski, Brain 1922: 45; 149-184; with the physiological significance of the reflex phenomena in spastic paralysis of the lower limbs. By F. M. R. Walshe, Brain 1914: 37; 269-336; and the Babinski plantar response, its forms, and its physiological and pathological significance. By F. M. R. Walshe, Brain 1956: 79; 529-556. Brain 133 (pt 5) : 1292, 2010.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. 

    Hogan GR & Milligan JE: The plantar reflex of the newborn. N Engl J Med 285 : 502, 1971.

  • 18. 

    Choi JY , Park HJ & Suh JS: Operative treatment for fourth curly toe deformity in adults. Foot Ankle Int 36 : 1089, 2015.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. 

    Shirzad K , Kiesau CD & DeOrio JK et al.: Lesser toe deformities. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19 : 505, 2011.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. 

    Reinherz RP: Varus-rotated fifth digits are frequently observed during podopediatric examination. J Foot Surg 30 : 429, 1991.

  • 21. 

    Weber RB: Surgical criteria for correcting the overlapping fifth toe. J Foot Surg 21 : 30, 1982.

  • 22. 

    Metaizeau JP: Posiciones anormales y malformaciones congénitas del pie en el niño. EMC - Aparato Locomotor 34 : 1, 2001.

  • 23. 

    Kriewall TJ: Uterine work in parturition. J Appl Physiol 41 : 316, 1976.

Prevalence of Clinodactyly in the Fourth and Fifth Toes of Newborns in Northern Spain: A Cross-Sectional Study

Fernando De Francisco-Peñalva
Search for other papers by Fernando De Francisco-Peñalva in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Alfonso Martínez-Nova
Search for other papers by Alfonso Martínez-Nova in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Anne Cecile Carrafang
Search for other papers by Anne Cecile Carrafang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DPM
,
José Carlos Cuevas-García
Search for other papers by José Carlos Cuevas-García in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Raquel Sánchez-Rodríguez
Search for other papers by Raquel Sánchez-Rodríguez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
David Alonso-Peña
Search for other papers by David Alonso-Peña in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
, and
Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron
Search for other papers by Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Background

The foot of a newborn is a structure that is under formation and is susceptible to presenting pathologic disorders from the moment of birth. Evidence of the prevalence of clinodactyly in newborns is scarce. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine that prevalence and its interrelationship with gestational and neonatal factors.

Methods

In a sample of 305 newborns (147 boys and 158 girls), the commonest podiatric medical alterations with either a genetic or a postural component present at the moment of birth were explored physically. The prevalence found in the sample was then related to different anthropometric, gestational, and racial/ethnic parameters of the newborn.

Results

The sex of the newborn was unrelated to any podiatric medical pathology found. Clinodactyly was present in approximately 90% of the fifth toes studied. Breech or transverse fetal presentation and the width of the forefoot affected the appearance of clinodactyly of the fourth and fifth toes. The anthropometric differences between the feet of boys and girls were verified.

Conclusions

The presence of clinodactyly of the fourth and fifth toes in newborns is a frequent clinical finding and should, therefore, be considered in the podopediatric examination. In the neonatal population studied, the pathologic disorders explored did not depend on sex. The prevalence of fourth and fifth toe clinodactyly was significantly influenced by breech or transverse presentation and by forefoot width, but not by the mother's race/ethnicity.

Departamento de Enfermeria, University of Extremadura, Plasencia, Spain.

University of Parnasse, Bruxelles, Belgium. Dr. Carrafang is now with Department of Podiatry, Haute Ecole Leonard De Vinci, Brussels, Belgium.

Rio Hortega Hospital, Valladolid, Spain.

Department of Nursing and Podiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.

Corresponding author: Alfonso Martínez-Nova, PhD, Departamento de Enfermería, Universidad de Extremadura, Avda. Virgen del Puerto 2, Centro Universitario de Plasencia, Plasencia, Cáceres 10600, Spain. (E-mail: podoalf@unex.es)
Save