• 1. 

    de Berker DAR & Rendall JRS: Retronychia: proximal ingrowing nail. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 12 (suppl 2): S126, 1999.

  • 2. 

    Haneke E: Controversies in the treatment of ingrown nails. Dermatol Res Pract 2012 : 783924, 2012.

  • 3. 

    Ventura F , Correia O & Duarte AF et al.: “Retronychia: clinical and pathophysiological aspects.” J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 30 : 16, 2016.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. 

    Haneke E: “Nail Specific Conditions,” in Histopathology of the Nail Onychopathology, edited by Haneke, E p 143, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group LLC, Bova Raton, FL, 2017.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. 

    Pizarro M , Pieressa N & Wortsman X: Posttraumatic retronychia of the foot with clinical and ultrasound correlation. JAPMA 107 : 253, 2017.

  • 6. 

    Wortsman X , Wortsman J & Guerrero R et al.: Anatomical changes in retronychia and onychomadesis detected using ultrasound. Dermatol Surg 36 : 1615, 2010.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. 

    Wortsman X , Calderon P & Baran R: Finger retronychias detected early by 3D ultrasound examination. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 26 : 254, 2012.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. 

    Braswell MA , Daniel CR III, & Brodell RT: Beau lines, onychomadesis, and retronychia: a unifying hypothesis. J Am Acad Dermatol 73 : 849, 2015.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. 

    Fouilloux B: Retronychias [in French]. Presse Med 43 : 1223, 2014.

  • 10. 

    de Berker DA , Richert B & Duhard E et al.: Retronychia: proximal ingrowing of the nail plate. J Am Acad Dermatol 58 : 978, 2008.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. 

    Dahdah MJ , Kibbi AG & Ghosn S: Retronychia: report of two cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 58 : 1051, 2008.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. 

    Piraccini BM , Richert B & de Berker DA et al.: Retronychia in children, adolescents, and young adults: a case series. J Am Acad Dermatol 70 : 388, 2014.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. 

    Cabete J & Lencastre A: Recognizing and treating retronychia. Int J Dermatol 54 : e51, 2015.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. 

    Baumgartner M & Haneke E: Retronychia: diagnosis and treatment. Dermatol Surg 36 : 1610, 2010.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

A Proposal for Determining a Diagnostic Cutoff Value of a New Ultrasonographic Index of Retronychia Inversely Correlating with Disease Severity

Fatih Göktay
Search for other papers by Fatih Göktay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Levent Soydan
Search for other papers by Levent Soydan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Emre Kaynak
Search for other papers by Emre Kaynak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Nebahat Demet Akpolat
Search for other papers by Nebahat Demet Akpolat in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
, and
Eckart Haneke
Search for other papers by Eckart Haneke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD

Background

Ultrasonography has demonstrated a shortening of the distance between the origin of the nail plate and the base of the distal phalanx in retronychia. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and ultrasonographic features of retronychia.

Methods

We evaluated the clinical findings in 18 patients with retronychia, along with the ratio of ultrasonographic distance a, extending between the nail plate origin and the base of the distal phalanx, to distance b, perpendicular to distance a, extending between the nail plate origin and the upper margin of the distal phalanx.

Results

Retronychia was present in 26 nails. The mean ± SD distance a was 7.66 ± 1.64 mm and distance b was 3.56 ± 1.95 mm. The mean ± SD a/b ratio was 2.59 ± 1.11. There was a significant inverse correlation between a/b ratio and clinical severity (Pearson correlation = –0.668; P < .001). The cutoff value of this ratio was 3.319, with specificity of 90% and sensitivity of 69%.

Conclusions

The ratio of distance a/distance b and the cutoff value of this ratio may help in making the diagnosis, in objectively determining the disease severity, and in selecting a patient-specific treatment approach.

Department of Dermatology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Hamidiye Medical Faculty, Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Hamidiye Medical Faculty, Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Dermatology, Tunceli State Hospital, Tunceli, Turkey.

Department of Dermatology, Beykoz State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Dermatology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

Corresponding author: Fatih Göktay, MD, Prof. Dr, Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Hamidiye Tıp Fakültesi, Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Deri ve Zührevi Hastalıkları Kliniği, Kalfaçeşme sok. No: 1, Koşuyolu, Üsküdar, İstanbul, 34662, Turkey. (E-mail: fatihgoktay@yahoo.com)
Save