Advertisement
-
1.
Scher RK: Onychomycosis: a significant medical disorder. J Am Acad Dermatol 35 : S2, 1996.
-
2.
Cozzani E , Agnoletti A & Speziari S et al.: Epidemiological study of onychomycosis in older adults with onychodystrophy. Geriatr Gerontol Int 16 : 486, 2016.
-
3.
Carney C , Tosti A & Daniel R et al.: A new classification system for grading the severity of onychomycosis: Onychomycosis Severity Index. Arch Dermatol 147 : 1277, 2011.
-
4.
Weinberg JM , Koestenblatt EK & Tutrone WD et al.: Comparison of diagnostic methods in the evaluation of onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 49 : 193, 2003.
-
5.
Li X , Wei T & Wang H et al.: Direct detection and differentiation of causative fungi of onychomycosis by multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based assay. Eur J Dermatol 21 : 37, 2011.
-
6.
Litz CE & Cavagnolo RZ: Polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of onychomycosis: a large, single-institute study. Br J Dermatol 163 : 511, 2010.
-
7.
Gupta AK & Nakrieko K: Onychomycosis infections: do polymerase chain reaction and culture reports agree? JAPMA 107 : 280, 2017.
-
8.
Bosshard PP: Incubation of fungal cultures: how long is long enough? Mycoses 54 : e539, 2011.
-
9.
Pourmand N , Elahi E & Davis RW et al.: Multiplex pyrosequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 30 : 1, 2002.
-
10.
Ghannoum MA , Hajjeh RA & Scher R et al.: A large-scale North American study of fungal isolates from nails: the frequency of onychomycosis fungal distribution, and antifungal susceptibility patterns. J Am Acad Dermatol 43 : 641, 2000.
Commercial Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction versus Periodic Acid–Schiff Testing for the Diagnosis of Onychomycosis
Search for other papers by Bryan Caldwell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Karen Uchmanowicz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jill S. Kawalec in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stephanie Petrofski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carl Kurzel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background
Diagnosis of onychomycosis using the periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) test for sensitive identification of hyphae and fungal culture for identification of species has become the mainstay for many clinical practices. With the advent of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, physicians can identify a fungal toenail infection quickly with the added benefit of species identification. We compared PAS testing with multiplex PCR testing from a clinical perspective.
Methods
A total of 209 patients with clinically diagnosed onychomycosis were recruited. A high-resolution picture was taken of the affected hallux nail, and the nail was graded using the Onychomycosis Severity Index. A proximal sample of the affected toenail and subungual debris were obtained and split into two equal samples. One sample was sent for multiplex PCR testing and the other for PAS testing. The results were analyzed and compared.
Results
Six patients were excluded due to insufficient sample size for PCR testing. Of the remaining 203 patients, 109 (53.7%) tested positive with PAS, 77 (37.9%) tested positive with PCR. Forty-one patients tested positive with PAS but negative with PCR, and nine tested positive with PCR but negative with PAS.
Conclusions
Physicians should continue the practice of using PAS biopsy staining for confirmation of a fungal toenail infection before using oral antifungal therapy. Because multiplex PCR allows species identification, some physicians may elect to perform both tests.
Kent State University College of Podiatric Medicine, Independence, OH. Dr. Caldwell is now with Barry University School of Podiatric Medicine, Miami Shores, FL.
Salem Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salem, VA. Dr. Uchmanowicz is now with Synergy Health Foot and Ankle, Midlothian, VA.
The Jewish Hospital, Cincinnati, OH.
Dayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dayton, OH.
