• 1.

    American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons: ACFAS recognized fellowships. Available at: https://www.acfas.org/Fellowship-Center/Recognized-Fellowship-Intiative/List-of-Available-Fellowships/. Accessed July 2018.

  • 2.

    Grabowski G & Walker JW: Orthopaedic fellowship selection criteria: a survey of fellowship directors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95 : e154, 2013.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Likert R: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 22 : 1, 1932.

  • 4.

    Inclan PM, Hyde AS & Hulme M et al.: For love, not money: the financial implications of surgical fellowship training. Am Surg 82 : 794, 2016.

  • 5.

    Hamid KS & Nunley JA: Quo vadis? perspectives on the future of foot & ankle fellowship training. Foot Ankle Int 37 : 1146, 2016.

    • Crossref
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

DPM Foot and Ankle Fellowship Selection Criteria: Survey of Fellowship Directors

View More View Less
Restricted access

Background

A recent increase in podiatric medicine fellowships has occurred as the field continues to progress. Research regarding selection criteria from a fellowship director's perspective for potential fellows is lacking. This study aimed to examine objective and subjective selection criteria that directors consider when selecting applicants for the interview and when ranking prospective fellows after the interview.

Methods

We electronically surveyed American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons fellowship directors with preselected criteria for granting applicants an interview and for compiling their ranking list after the interview. A Likert scale from 1 (most important) to 5 (least important) was used to prioritize each criterion, an average rating was calculated, and the results were placed in order of importance.

Results

The most important selection criteria for granting an interview were quality of residency program (1.985), a written personal statement of reasons for attending that fellowship (2.063), and publications/presentations produced as a resident (2.267). The most important criteria in completing the ranking order after the interview were assessment of applicant's personality (1.111), interview performance (1.173), and expressed interest in program (1.563).

Conclusions

Knowledge of the selection criteria that fellowship directors seek in applicants can assist those who desire to further their training. The selection criteria that program directors seek differed between being selected for the interview, which combined both objective and subjective criteria, and when compiling their rankings after the interview, which included only subjective criteria. Results show more emphasis on subjective selection criteria when directors select applicants for an interview and when ranking applicants after the interview.

Wake Forest Baptist Health System, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC.

Corresponding author: Paula Gangopadhyay, DPM, FACFAS, Podiatry Section Research Director, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157. (E-mail: pgangopa@wakehealth.edu)