advertising
-
1.
Rodriguez Valverde DPE: ¿Dolor de Espalda y Rodilla? ¡La Respuesta Está en los Pies! United P.C. Publishing, London, 2012.
-
2.
Tong JW & Kong P: Association between foot type and lower extremity injuries: systematic literature review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 43 : 700, 2013.
-
3.
Escamilla-Martínez E , Martínez-Nova A & Gómez-Martín B et al.: The effect of moderate running on foot posture index and plantar pressure distribution in male recreational runners. JAPMA 103 : 121, 2013.
-
4.
Neal BS , Griffiths IB & Dowling GJ et al.: Foot posture as a risk factor for lower limb overuse injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res 7 : 55, 2014.
-
5.
Barnes A , Wheat J & Milner CE: Fore- and rearfoot kinematics in high- and low-arched individuals during running. Foot Ankle Int 32 : 710, 2011.
-
6.
Queen RM , Mall NA & Nunley JA et al.: Differences in plantar loading between flat and normal feet during different athletic tasks. Gait Posture 29 : 582, 2009.
-
7.
Abián Vicén J , Alegre Durán LM & Lara Sánchez AJ et al.: Fuerzas de reacción del suelo en pies cavos y planos. Arch Med del Deport 22 : 285, 2005.
-
8.
Levinger P , Murley G & Barton C et al.: A comparison of foot kinematics in people with normal and flat arched feet using the Oxford Foot Model. Gait Posture 32 : 519, 2010.
-
9.
Berdejo del Fresno D , Sánchez AJ, Lara & Martínez López EJ et al.: Footprint modifications according to the physical activity practiced. Rev Int Med Ciencias Act Fis Deport 13 : 19, 2013.
-
10.
Boozari S , Jamshidi AA & Sanjari MA et al.: Effect of functional fatigue on vertical ground-reaction force in individuals with flat feet. J Sport Rehabil 22 : 177, 2013.
-
11.
Delgado-Abellán L , Aguado X & Jiménez-Ormeño E et al.: Efectos del ejercicio continuo e intermitente sobre la huella plantar. Arch Med Deport 148 : 601, 2012.
-
12.
Chang-Ryeol L , Myung-Kwon K & Mi S: The relationship between balance and foot pressure in fatigue of the plantar intrinsic foot muscles of adults with flexible flatfoot. J Phys Ther Sci 24 : 699, 2012.
-
13.
Burrows RA , Diaz N & Muzzo S: Variations of body mass index (BMI) according to degree of pubertal development [in Spanish]. Rev Med Chil 132 : 1363, 2004.
-
14.
SEEDO (Sociedad Española para el Estudio de la Obesidad). Available at: http://www.seedo.es/.
-
15.
Redmond AC , Crane YZ & Menz HB: Normative values for the Foot Posture Index. J Foot Ankle Res 1 : 6, 2008.
-
16.
Keenan A-M , Redmond AC & Horton M et al.: The Foot Posture Index: Rasch analysis of a novel, foot-specific outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88 : 88, 2007.
-
17.
Redmond AC , Crosbie J & Ouvrier RA: Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: the Foot Posture Index. Clin Biomech 21 : 89, 2006.
-
18.
Gijon-Nogueron G , Martinez-Nova A & Alfageme-Garcia P et al.: International normative data for paediatric foot posture assessment: a cross-sectional investigation. BMJ Open 9 : e023341, 2019.
-
19.
Cavanagh PR & Rodgers MM: The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. J Biomech 20 : 547, 1987.
-
20.
Menz HB & Munteanu SE: Validity of 3 clinical techniques for the measurement of static foot posture in older people. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 35 : 479, 2005.
-
21.
McCrory JL , Young MJ & Boulton AJM et al.: Arch index as a predictor of arch height. Foot 7 : 79, 1997.
-
22.
Pita-Fernández S , González-Martín C & Seoane-Pillado T et al.: Validity of footprint analysis to determine flatfoot using clinical diagnosis as the gold standard in a random sample aged 40 years and older. J Epidemiol 25 : 148, 2015.
-
23.
Pauk J , Ihnatouski M & Najafi B: Assessing plantar pressure distribution in children with flatfoot arch: application of the Clarke angle. JAPMA 104 : 622, 2014.
-
24.
Yelling M , Lamb K & Swaine I: Validity of a pictorial perceived exertion scale for effort estimation and effort production during stepping exercise in adolescent children. Eur Phys Educ Rev 8 : 157, 2002.
-
25.
Williams JG , Eston R & Furlong B: CERT: a perceived exertion scale for young children. Percept Mot Skills 79 : 1451, 1994.
-
26.
Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed, p 567, Routledge, Abingdon, England, 1988.
-
27.
Rosenthal R & Rubin DB: A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. J Educ Psychol 74 : 166, 1982.
-
28.
Mora J: Teoría del Entrenamiento y del Acondicionamiento Físico, COPLEF Andalucía, Sevilla, Espana, 1995.
-
29.
Sebastiani E & González C: Cualidades Físicas, p 104, Inde, Barcelona, 2000.
-
30.
Generelo E & Plana C: Teoría y Práctica del Acondicionamiento Físico, Pila Teleña, Madrid, 1997.
-
31.
Buldk AK , Forghany S & Landorf KB et al.: Foot posture is associated with plantar pressure during gait: a comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet. Gait Posture 62 : 235, 2018.
-
32.
McPoil TG & Hunt GC: Evaluation and management of foot and ankle disorders: present problems and future directions. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 21 : 381, 1995.
-
33.
Kirby K: Foot and Lower Extremity Biomechanics III: Precision Intricast Newsletters, 2002-2008, Precision Intricast Inc, Payson, AZ, 2008.
-
34.
Shih Y-F , Chen C-Y & Chen W-Y et al.: Lower extremity kinematics in children with and without flexible flatfoot: a comparative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13 : 31, 2012.
-
35.
Murley GS , Menz HB & Landorf KB: Foot posture influences the electromyographic activity of selected lower limb muscles during gait. J Foot Ankle Res 2 : 35, 2009.
-
36.
Earle RW & Baechle TR: Manual NSCA: Fundamentos del Entrenamiento Personal, Paidotribo, Barcelona, 2008.
-
37.
Díaz FJ: Lesiones musculares en el deporte. Rev Int Cienc Deporte II : 55, 2006.
-
38.
Kirby K: Foot and Lower Extremity Biomechanics: A Ten Year Collection of Precision Intricast Newsletters, Precision Intricast Inc, Payson, AZ, 1997.
-
39.
Bisiaux M & Moretto P: The effects of fatigue on plantar pressure distribution in walking. Gait Posture 28 : 693, 2008.
-
40.
Nielsen RO , Buist I & Parner ET et al.: Foot pronation is not associated with increased injury risk in novice runners wearing a neutral shoe: a 1-year prospective cohort study. Br J Sports Med 48 : 440, 2014.
-
41.
Evans AM: Relationship between “growing pains” and foot posture in children: single-case experimental designs in clinical practice. JAPMA 93 : 111, 2003.
-
42.
Kirby K & Green D: “Evaluation and Nonoperative Management of Pes Valgus,” in Foot and Ankle Disorder in Children , ed by DeValentine, SJ p 295, Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1992.
-
43.
Borg GA: Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14 : 377, 1982.
-
44.
Tudor A , Ruzic L & Sestan B et al.: Flat-footedness is not a disadvantage for athletic performance in children aged 11 to 15 years. Pediatrics 123 : e386, 2009.
-
45.
Lin CJ , Lai K a & Kuan TS et al.: Correlating factors and clinical significance of flexible flatfoot in preschool children. J Pediatr Orthop 21 : 378, 2001.
-
46.
World Health Organization: Estrategia mundial sobre régimen alimentario, actividad física y salud: la actividad física en los jóvenes. Available at: https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_young_people/es/. Published 2014.
Fatigue in Children with Pronated Feet After Aerobic Exercises
Search for other papers by María de los Ángeles Gómez-Benítez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrea Gómez-Benítez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Javier Ramos-Ortega in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by José M. Castillo-López in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lorena Bellido-Fernandez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pedro V. Munuera-Martínez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background
Sports have a strong influence on current society. Foot posture has been postulated to be a risk factor for overuse injuries; however, the link between foot posture and injuries is unclear. This study aimed to determine whether children with pronated feet become more fatigued after participating in sports tests than those with normal feet.
Methods
One hundred five children aged 10 to 12 years (mean ± SD age, 10.46 ± 0.78 years) participated in the sports tests, which were aerobic-type resistance exercises with six stations at which each child remained for 30 sec. The posture of the foot was evaluated via the Foot Posture Index and the plantar footprint via the arch index and the Clarke angle before and after aerobic-type resistance exercises. Perceived tiredness was evaluated with the Pictorial Children's Effort Rating Table (PCERT) and whether there was pain during or after physical activity.
Results
The variables used to measure foot posture and the plantar arch changed more in the pronated feet, suggesting that the feet undergo more pronation after physical exercise. The neutral feet obtained a mean ± SD PCERT score of 5.46 ± 1.89 and the pronated feet a score of 7.60 ± 1.92.
Conclusions
Children with pronated feet showed more fatigue and foot pain during and/or after physical exercise than those with neutral feet. Foot type could be responsible for the lack of enthusiasm of children toward undertaking healthy activities, and this problem might be solved via appropriate orthopedic treatment.
Department of Podiatry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Servicio de hemodiálisis linense, Cádiz, Spain.
Department of Physiotherapy, University of Seville, Spain.
advertising
