advertising
-
1.
Sammarco GJ & Hockenbury RT: “Biomechanics of the Foot and Ankle,” in Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeleteal System, 3rd Ed, edited by Nordin, M & Frankel, VH p 222, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2001.
-
2.
Wiewiorski M & Valderrabano V: Painful flatfoot deformity. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 78 : 20, 2011.
-
3.
Tome J , Nawoczenski DA & Flemister A et al.: Comparison of foot kinematics between subjects with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction and healthy controls. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36 : 635, 2006.
-
4.
Aminian G , Safaeepour Z & Farhoodi M et al.: The effect of prefabricated and proprioceptive foot orthoses on plantar pressure distribution in patients with flexible flatfoot during walking. Prosthet Orthot Int 37 : 227, 2013.
-
5.
Chuckpaiwong B , Nunley JA & Mall NA et al.: The effect of foot type on in-shoe plantar pressure during walking and running. Gait Posture 28 : 405, 2008.
-
6.
Xu C , Wen XX & Huang LY et al.: Normal foot loading parameters and repeatability of the Footscan® platform system. J Foot Ankle Res 10 : 30, 2017.
-
7.
Aharonson Z , Arcan M & Steinback TV: Foot-ground pressure pattern of flexible flatfoot in children, with and without correction of calcaneovalgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 278 : 177, 1992.
-
8.
Ledoux WR & Hillstrom HJ: The distributed plantar vertical force of neutrally aligned and pes planus feet. Gait Posture 15 : 1, 2002.
-
9.
Queen RM , Mall NA & Nunley JA et al.: Differences in plantar loading between flat and normal feet during different athletic tasks. Gait Posture 29 : 582, 2009.
-
10.
Buldt AK , Allan JJ & Landorf KB et al.: The relationship between foot posture and plantar pressure during walking in adults: a systematic review. Gait Posture 62 : 56, 2018.
-
11.
Lee SM , Lee DY & Hong JH et al.: The effect of elastic and non-elastic tape on flat foot. Indian J Sci Technol 8 : 1, 2015.
-
12.
Nolan D & Kennedy N: Effects of low-dye taping on plantar pressure pre and post exercise: an exploratory study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10 : 40, 2009.
-
13.
Tang SFT , Chen CH & Wu CK et al.: The effects of total contact insole with forefoot medial posting on rearfoot movement and foot pressure distributions in patients with flexible flatfoot. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 129 : 8, 2015.
-
14.
O'Sullivan K , Kennedy N & O'Neill E et al.: The effect of low-dye taping on rearfoot motion and plantar pressure during the stance phase of gait. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9 : 1, 2008.
-
15.
Griebert MC , Needle AR & McConnell J et al.: Lower-leg kinesio tape reduces rate of loading in participants with medial tibial stress syndrome. Phys Ther Sport 18 : 62, 2014.
-
16.
Elveru AR , Rothstein JM & Lamb RL et al.: Methods for taking subtalar joint measurements: a clinical report. Phys Ther 68 : 678, 1988.
-
17.
Gray G: Functional Locomotor Biomechanical Examination. American Physical Rehabilitation Network, Toledo, 1984.
-
18.
Morrison SC , Durward BR & Watt GF et al.: A literature review evaluating the role of the navicular in the clinical and scientific examination of the foot. Br J Pod 7 : 110, 2004.
-
19.
Razeghi M & Batt ME: Foot type classification: a critical review of current methods. Gait Posture 15 : 282, 2002.
-
20.
Redmond A , Crosbie J & Ouvrier RA: Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: the foot posture index. Clin Biomech 21 : 89, 2006.
-
21.
Özaras N & Yalçın S: Normal yürüme ve yürüme analizi-derleme. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil 48: 2002.
-
22.
Tuna H: Pedobarographic evaluation in foot disorders. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil 51 : 51, 2005.
-
23.
Pauk J , Ihnatouski M & Najafi B: Assessing plantar pressure distribution in children with flatfoot arch: application of the Clarke angle. JAPMA 104 : 622, 2014.
-
24.
Melai T , IJzerman TH & Schaper NC et al.: Calculation of plantar pressure time integral, an alternative approach. Gait Posture 34 : 379, 2011.
-
25.
Smith MMF , Coates SS & Creaby MW: A comparison of rigid tape and exercise, elastic tape and exercise and exercise alone on pain and lower limb function in individuals with exercise related leg pain: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15 : 1, 2014.
-
26.
De Cock A , De Clercq D & Willems T et al.: Temporal characteristics of foot roll-over during barefoot jogging: reference data for young adults. Gait Posture 21 : 432, 2005.
-
27.
Redmond AC , Landorf KB & Keenan AM: Contoured, prefabricated foot orthoses demonstrate comparable mechanical properties to contoured, customised foot orthoses: a plantar pressure study. J Foot Ankle Res 2 : 1, 2009.
-
28.
Vicenzino B , McPoil T & Buckland S: Plantar foot pressures after the augmented low dye taping technique. J Athl Train 42 : 374, 2007.
-
29.
San Tsung BY , Zhang M , Mak AFT et al: Effectiveness of insoles on plantar pressure redistribution. J Rehabil Res Dev 41 : 767, 2004.
-
30.
Prompers L , Huijberts M & Apelqvist J et al.: High prevalence of ischemia, infection and serious comorbidity in patient with diabetic foot disease in Europe: baseline results from the Eurodiale study. Diabetologia 50 : 18, 2007.
-
31.
Healy A , Dunning DN & Chockalingam N: Effect of insole material on lower limb kinematics and plantar pressures during treadmill walking. Prosthet Orthot Int 36 : 53, 2012.
Effects of Different External Supports on Plantar Pressure-Time Integral and Contact Area in Flexible Flatfoot
Search for other papers by Banu Ünver in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nilgün Bek in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background
Flexible flatfoot disturbs the load distribution of the foot. Various external supports are used to prevent abnormal plantar loading in flexible flatfoot. However, few studies have compared the effects of different external supports on plantar loading in flexible flatfoot. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of elastic taping, nonelastic taping, and custom-made foot orthoses on plantar pressure-time integral and contact area in flexible flatfoot.
Methods
Twenty-seven participants with flexible flatfoot underwent dynamic pedobarographic analysis while barefoot and with elastic tape, nonelastic tape, and custom-made foot orthoses.
Results
Pressure-time integral percentage was higher with foot orthoses than in the barefoot and taping conditions in the midfoot (P < .001) and was lower with foot orthoses than in barefoot in the right forefoot (P < .05). Pressure-time integral values were lower with foot orthoses in the second, third, and fourth metatarsals and the lateral heel (P < .05). With foot orthoses, contact area values were higher in the toes; second, third, and fourth metatarsi; midfoot; and heel compared with the other conditions (P < .05). Pressure-time integral in the right lateral heel and contact area in the left fourth metatarsal increased with nonelastic taping versus barefoot (P < .05).
Conclusions
Foot orthoses are more effective in providing dynamic pressure redistribution in flexible flatfoot. Although nonelastic taping has some effects, taping methods may be insufficient in altering the measured pedobarographic values in this condition.
Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey. Dr. Ünver is now with Lokman Hekim University, Ankara, Turkey.
Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. Dr. Bek is now with Lokman Hekim University, Ankara, Turkey.
advertising
