• 1. 

    Tong KB & Furia J: Economic burden of plantar fasciitis treatment in the United States. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 39 : 227, 2010.

  • 2. 

    Bishop C , Arnold JB & May T: Effects of taping and orthoses on foot biomechanics in adults with flat-arched feet. Med Sci Sports Exerc 48 : 689, 2016.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. 

    Podolsky R & Kalichman L: Taping for plantar fasciitis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 28 : 1, 2015.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. 

    Radford JA , Landorf KB & Buchbinder R et al.: Effectiveness of low-Dye taping for the short-term treatment of plantar heel pain: a randomised trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7 : 64, 2006.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. 

    Newell T , Simon J & Docherty CL: Arch-taping techniques for altering navicular height and plantar pressures during activity. J Athl Train 50 : 825, 2015.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. 

    Sanzo P & Bauer T: The effects of low Dye taping on vertical foot pressure in subjects with plantar fasciitis. Int J Prevent Treat 4 : 1, 2015.

  • 7. 

    Carter K & Chockalingam N: An assessment of strapping techniques commonly used for pronated foot deformities. JAPMA 99 : 391, 2009.

  • 8. 

    Perrin DH: Athletic Taping and Bracing. 2nd Ed. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, 2005.

  • 9. 

    Hillstrom HJ , Song J & Kraszewski AP et al.: Foot type biomechanics: part 1. Structure and function of the asymptomatic foot. Gait Posture 37 : 445, 2013.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. 

    Butler RJ , Hillstrom H & Song J et al.: Arch height index measurement system: establishment of reliability and normative values. JAPMA 98 : 102, 2008.

  • 11. 

    Song J , Choe K & Neary M et al.: Comprehensive biomechanical characterization of feet in USMA cadets: comparison across race, gender, arch flexibility, and foot types. Gait Posture 60 : 175, 2018.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Web of Science
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Does QUICK TAPE Offer Comparable Support and Off-loading as Low-Dye Taping?

Jinsup Song
Search for other papers by Jinsup Song in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DPM, PhD
,
Julie Lin
Search for other papers by Julie Lin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DPM
,
Tyler Austin
Search for other papers by Tyler Austin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DPM
,
Richard Teter
Search for other papers by Richard Teter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DPM
,
Kevin Oshiokpekhai
Search for other papers by Kevin Oshiokpekhai in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DPM
,
Michael An
Search for other papers by Michael An in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DPM
,
Heather Tran
Search for other papers by Heather Tran in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DPM
,
Howard Palamarchuk
Search for other papers by Howard Palamarchuk in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DPM
, and
Steven Pettineo
Search for other papers by Steven Pettineo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DPT, OCS, CSCS

Background

Low-Dye taping is commonly used to manage foot pathologies and pain. Precut one-piece QUICK TAPE was designed to facilitate taping. However, no study to date has demonstrated that QUICK TAPE offers similar support and off-loading as traditional taping.

Methods

This pilot study compared the performance of QUICK TAPE and low-Dye taping in 20 healthy participants (40 feet) with moderate-to-severe pes planus. Study participants completed arch height index (AHI), dynamic plantar assessment with a plantar pressure measurement system, and subjective rating in three conditions: barefoot, low-Dye, and QUICK TAPE. The order of test conditions was randomized for each participant, and the taping was applied to both feet based on a standard method. A generalized estimating equation with an identity link function was used to examine differences across test conditions while accounting for potential dependence in bilateral data.

Results

Participants stood with a significantly greater AHI (P = .007) when either taping was applied compared with barefoot. Participants also demonstrated significantly different plantar loading when walking with both tapings versus barefoot. Both tapings yielded reduced force-time integral (FTI) in the medial and lateral forefoot and increased FTI under toes. Unlike previous studies, however, no lateralization of plantar pressure was observed with either taping. Participants ranked both tapings more supportive than barefoot. Most participants (77.8%) ranked low-Dye least comfortable, and 55.6% preferred QUICK TAPE over low-Dye.

Conclusions

Additional studies are needed to examine the clinical utility of QUICK TAPE in individuals with foot pathologies such as heel pain syndrome and metatarsalgia.

Temple University School of Podiatric Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

Corresponding author: Jinsup Song, DPM, PhD, Temple University School of Podiatric Medicine, 148 N 8th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107. (E-mail: jsong@temple.edu)
Save