• 1.

    Gurney B: Leg length discrepancy. Gait Posture 15: 195, 2002.

  • 2.

    Woerman AL & Binder-Macleod SA: Leg length discrepancy assessment: accuracy and precision in five clinical methods of evaluation*. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 5: 230, 1984.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Baylis WJ & Rzonca EC: Functional and structural limb length discrepancies: evaluation and treatment. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 5: 509, 1988.

  • 4.

    Khamis S & Carmeli E: Relationship and significance of gait deviations associated with limb length discrepancy: a systematic review. Gait Posture 57: 115, 2017.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Moseley CF: “Leg Length Discrepancy and Angular Deformity of the Lower Limbs,” in Lovell and Winter's Pediatric Orthopaedics, 4th Ed, ed by Lovell, WW, Winter, RB, Morrissy, RT & Weinstein, SL p 849, Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 1996.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Brady RJ , Dean JB & Skinner TM et al.: Limb length inequality: clinical implications for assessment and intervention. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 33: 221, 2003.

  • 7.

    Campbell TM , Ghaedi BB & Tanjong Ghogomu E et al.: Shoe lifts for leg length discrepancy in adults with common painful musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 99: 981, 2018.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    McCaw ST & Bates BT: Biomechanical implications of mild leg length inequality. Br J Sports Med 25: 10, 1991.

  • 9.

    Reid DC & Smith B: Leg length inequality: a review of etiology and management. Physiother Can 36: 177, 1984.

  • 10.

    Walsh M , Connolly P & Jenkinson A et al.: Leg length discrepancy: an experimental study of compensatory changes in three dimensions using gait analysis. Gait Posture 12: 156, 2000.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Resende RA , Kirkwood RN & Deluzio KJ et al.: Biomechanical strategies implemented to compensate for mild leg length discrepancy during gait. Gait Posture 46: 147, 2016.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Friberg O: Leg length asymmetry in stress fractures: a clinical and radiological study. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 22: 485, 1982.

  • 13.

    Goel A , Loudon J & Nazare A et al.: Joint moments in minor limb length discrepancy: a pilot study. Am J Orthop Belle Mead NJ 26: 852, 1997.

  • 14.

    Kaufman KR , Miller LS & Sutherland DH: Gait asymmetry in patients with limb-length inequality. J Pediatr Orthop 16: 144, 1996.

  • 15.

    Khamis S & Carmeli E: The effect of simulated leg length discrepancy on lower limb biomechanics during gait. Gait Posture 61: 73, 2018.

  • 16.

    Dingwell JB , Davis BL & Frazder DM: Use of an instrumented treadmill for real-time gait symmetry evaluation and feedback in normal and trans-tibial amputee subjects. Prosthet Orthot Int 20: 101, 1996.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Seeley MK , Umberger BR & Clasey JL et al.: The relation between mild leg-length inequality and able-bodied gait asymmetry. J Sports Sci Med 9: 572, 2010.

  • 18.

    Liu X-C , Fabry G & Molenaers G et al.: Kinematic and kinetic asymmetry in patients with leg-length discrepancy. J Pediatr Orthop 18: 187, 1998.

  • 19.

    Murray KJ & Azari MF: Leg length discrepancy and osteoarthritis in the knee, hip and lumbar spine. J Can Chiropr Assoc 59: 226, 2015.

  • 20.

    Tallroth K , Ristolainen L & Manninen M: Is a long leg a risk for hip or knee osteoarthritis? Acta Orthop 88: 512, 2017.

  • 21.

    Knutson GA: Anatomic and functional leg-length inequality: a review and recommendation for clinical decision-making: part I. Anatomic leg-length inequality: prevalence, magnitude, effects and clinical significance. Chiropr Osteopat 13: 11, 2005.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Guichet JM , Spivak JM & Trouilloud P et al.: Lower limb-length discrepancy: an epidemiologic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 272: 235, 1991.

  • 23.

    White SC , Gilchrist LA & Wilk BE: Asymmetric limb loading with true or simulated leg-length differences. Clin Orthop Relat Res 421: 287, 2004.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Cooperstein R & Lucente M: Comparison of supine and prone methods of leg length inequality assessment. J Chiropr Med 16: 103, 2017.

  • 25.

    Murray KJ , Molyneux T & Le Grande MR et al.: Association of mild leg length discrepancy and degenerative changes in the hip joint and lumbar spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 40: 320, 2017.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Young RS , Andrew PD & Cummings GS: Effect of simulating leg length inequality on pelvic torsion and trunk mobility. Gait Posture 11: 217, 2000.

  • 27.

    Needham R , Chockalingam N & Dunning D et al.: The effect of leg length discrepancy on pelvis and spine kinematics during gait. Stud Health Technol Inform 176: 104, 2012.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Defrin R , Benyamin SB & Aldubi RD et al.: Conservative correction of leg-length discrepancies of 10mm or less for the relief of chronic low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86: 2075, 2005.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Cummings G , Scholz JP & Barnes K: The effect of imposed leg length difference on pelvic bone symmetry. Spine 18: 368, 1993.

  • 30.

    Specht DL & De KB: Anatomical leg length inequality, scoliosis and lordotic curve in unselected clinic patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 14: 368, 1991.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Papaioannou T , Stokes I & Kenwright J: Scoliosis associated with limb-length inequality. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64: 59, 1982.

  • 32.

    Blake RL & Ferguson HJ: Correlation between limb length discrepancy and asymmetrical rearfoot position. JAPMA 83: 625, 1993.

  • 33.

    Friberg O: Clinical symptoms and biomechanics of lumbar spine and hip joint in leg length inequality. Spine 8: 643, 1983.

  • 34.

    Friberg O: Leg length inequality and low back pain. Lancet 324: 1039, 1984.

  • 35.

    Cooperstein R & Lew M: The relationship between pelvic torsion and anatomical leg length inequality: a review of the literature. J Chiropr Med 8: 107, 2009.

  • 36.

    Kendall JC , Bird AR & Azari MF: Foot posture, leg length discrepancy and low back pain: their relationship and clinical management using foot orthoses: an overview. Foot (Edinb) 24: 75, 2014.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Bandy WD & Sinning WE: Kinematic effects of heel lift use to correct lower limb length differences*. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 7: 173, 1986.

  • 38.

    Golightly YM , Tate JJ & Burns CB et al.: Changes in pain and disability secondary to shoe lift intervention in subjects with limb length inequality and chronic low back pain: a preliminary report. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 37: 380, 2007.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    da C Menezes Costa L , Maher CG & McAuley JH et al.: Prognosis for patients with chronic low back pain: inception cohort study. BMJ 339: b3829, 2009.

  • 40.

    Jamaluddin S , Sulaiman AR & Kamarul Imran M et al.: Reliability and accuracy of the tape measurement method with a nearest reading of 5 mm in the assessment of leg length discrepancy. Singapore Med J 52: 681, 2011.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Beattie P , Isaacson K & Riddle DL et al.: Validity of derived measurements of leg-length differences obtained by use of a tape measure. Phys Ther 70: 150, 1990.

  • 42.

    Asim HM , Qayyum A & Hashim JA: Leg length discrepancy. Prof Med J 20: 995, 2013.

  • 43.

    Neelly K , Wallmann HW & Backus CJ: Validity of measuring leg length with a tape measure compared to a computed tomography scan. Physiother Theory Pract 29: 487, 2013.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44.

    Gogia PP & Braatz JH: Validity and reliability of leg length measurements. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 8: 185, 1986.

  • 45.

    Kadaba MP , Ramakrishnan HK & Wootten ME: Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res 8: 383, 1990.

  • 46.

    Farahpour N , Jafarnezhad A & Damavandi M et al.: Gait ground reaction force characteristics of low back pain patients with pronated foot and able-bodied individuals with and without foot pronation. J Biomech 49: 1705, 2016.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    Hayashi K , Ikemoto T & Ueno T et al.: Regional differences of repeatability on visual analogue scale with experimental mechanical pain stimuli. Neurosci Lett 585: 67, 2015.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    Tipton SC , Sutherland JK & Schwarzkopf R: The assessment of limb length discrepancy before total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31: 888, 2016.

  • 49.

    Sabharwal S & Kumar A: Methods for assessing leg length discrepancy. Clin Orthop 466: 2910, 2008.

  • 50.

    Carlson M & Wilkerson J: Are differences in leg length predictive of lateral patello-femoral pain? Physiother Res Int 12: 29, 2007.

  • 51.

    Eliks M , Ostiak-Tomaszewska W & Lisiński P et al.: Does structural leg-length discrepancy affect postural control? preliminary study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18: 346, 2017.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    Gofton JP: Persistent low back pain and leg length disparity. J Rheumatol 12: 747, 1985.

  • 53.

    Giles LGF & Taylor JR: Low-back pain associated with leg length inequality. Spine 6: 510, 1981.

  • 54.

    Nakanowatari T , Suzukamo Y & Izumi S-I: The effectiveness of specific exercise approach or modifiable heel lift in the treatment of functional leg length discrepancy in early post-surgery inpatients after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial with a PROBE design. Phys Ther Res 19: 39, 2016.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55.

    O'Leary CB , Cahill CR & Robinson AW et al.: A systematic review: the effects of podiatrical deviations on nonspecific chronic low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 26: 117, 2013.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56.

    Golob AL & Wipf JE: Low back pain. Med Clin North Am 98: 405, 2014.

  • 57.

    Menz HB , Dufour AB & Riskowski JL et al.: Foot posture, foot function and low back pain: the Framingham Foot Study. Rheumatology 52: 2275, 2013.

  • 58.

    Dixon PC , Böhm H & Döderlein L: Ankle and midfoot kinetics during normal gait: a multi-segment approach. J Biomech 45: 1011, 2012.

  • 59.

    Leardini A , Benedetti MG & Berti L et al.: Rear-foot, mid-foot and fore-foot motion during the stance phase of gait. Gait Posture 25: 453, 2007.

  • 60.

    Rhodes DW & Bishop PA: The relationship between pelvic torsion and anatomical leg length inequality: a review of the literature. J Chiropr Med 9: 95, 2010.

  • 61.

    Betsch M , Wild M & Große B et al.: The effect of simulating leg length inequality on spinal posture and pelvic position: a dynamic rasterstereographic analysis. Eur Spine 21: 691, 2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 62.

    Harvey W , Yang M & Cooke T et al.: Associations of leg length inequality with prevalent, incident, and progressive knee osteoarthritis: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 152: 287, 2010.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63.

    Perttunen JR , Anttila E & Södergård J et al.: Gait asymmetry in patients with limb length discrepancy. Scand J Med Sci Sports 14: 49, 2004.

  • 64.

    Gurney B , Mermier C & Robergs R et al.: Effects of limb-length discrepancy on gait economy and lower-extremity muscle activity in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83: 907, 2001.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Effects of Orthotic Insoles on Gait Kinematics and Low-Back Pain in Patients with Mild Leg Length Discrepancy

Charlotte Menez
Search for other papers by Charlotte Menez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Jérémy Coquart
Search for other papers by Jérémy Coquart in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Damien Dodelin
Search for other papers by Damien Dodelin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Claire Tourny
Search for other papers by Claire Tourny in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Maxime L'Hermette
Search for other papers by Maxime L'Hermette in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Background

Mild leg length discrepancy increases biomechanical asymmetry during gait, which leads to low-back pain. Orthotic insoles with a directly integrated heel lift were used to reduce this asymmetry and thus the associated low-back pain. The aim of this study was to analyze the biomechanical adaptations of the locomotor apparatus during gait and the subjective pain ratings before and after the establishment of orthotic insole use.

Methods

Eight patients with mild leg length discrepancy (≤2.0 cm) underwent three-dimensional biomechanical analysis while walking before and after 3 weeks of orthotic insole use. Low-back pain was assessed separately before both measurement sessions using a visual analog scale.

Results

Analysis of the kinematic parameters highlighted individual adaptations. The symmetry index of Dingwell indicated that orthotic insoles had no significant effect on the kinematic gait parameters and an unpredictable effect across patients. Orthotic insole use significantly and systematically (in all of the patients) reduced low-back pain (P < .05), which was correlated with changes in ankle kinematics (P = .02, r = 0.80).

Conclusions

The effects of orthotic insoles on gait symmetry are unpredictable and specific to each patient's individual manner of biomechanical compensation. The reduction in low-back pain seems to be associated with the improved ankle kinematics during gait.

Rouen University, CETAPS, EA 3832, UFR STAPS, Mont Saint Aignan, France.

Mathilde Hospital 2, Orthodynamica Center, Rouen, France.

Corresponding author: Charlotte Menez, PhD, Rouen University, CETAPS, EA 3832, UFR STAPS, Mont Saint Aignan, France. (E-mail: charlotte.menez28@gmail.com)