advertising
-
1.
Court-Brown CM , McBirnie J & Wilson G: Adult ankle fractures—an increasing problem? Acta Orthop Scand 69: 43, 1988.
-
2.
Probst EN , Maas R & Meenen NM: Isolated fracture of the posterolateral tibial lip (Volkmann's triangle). Acta Radiol 38: 359, 1997.
-
3.
Jaskulka RA , Ittner G & Schedl R: Fractures of the posterior tibial margin: their role in the prognosis of malleolar fractures. J Trauma 29: 1565, 1989.
-
4.
Evers J , Barz L & Wähnert D et al.: Size matters: the influence of the posterior fragment on patient outcomes in trimalleolar ankle fractures. Injury 46 (suppl 4): 109, 2015.
-
5.
Hartford JM , Gorczyca JT & McNamara JL et al.: Tibiotalar contact area. Contribution of posterior malleolus and deltoid ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 320: 182, 1995.
-
6.
Macko VW , Matthews LS & Zwirkoski P et al.: The joint-contact area of the ankle. The contribution of the posterior malleolus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73: 347, 1991.
-
7.
Veltman ES , Halma JJ & de Gast A: Longterm outcome of 886 posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic review of the literature. Foot Ankle Surg 22: 73, 2016.
-
8.
Odak S , Ahluwalia R & Unnikrishnan P et al.: Management of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg 55: 140, 2016.
-
9.
Langenhuijsen JF , Heetveld MJ & Ultee JM et al.: Results of ankle fractures with involvement of the posterior tibial margin. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 53: 55, 2002.
-
10.
Mingo-Robinet J , López-Durán L & Galeote JE et al.: Ankle fractures with posterior malleolar fragment: management and results. J Foot Ankle Surg 50: 141, 2011.
-
11.
De Vries JS , Wijgman AJ & Sierevelt IN et al.: Long-term results of ankle fractures with a posterior malleolar fragment. J Foot Ankle Surg 44: 211, 2005.
-
12.
Ferries JS , DeCoster TA & Firoozbakhsh KK et al.: Plain radiographic interpretation in trimalleolar ankle fractures poorly assesses posterior fragment size. J Orthop Trauma 8: 328, 1994.
-
13.
Xu HL , Li X & Zhang DY et al.: A retrospective study of posterior malleolus fractures. Int Orthop 36: 1929, 2012.
-
14.
Drijfhout van Hooff CC , Verhage SM & Hoogendoorn JM: Influence of fragment size and postoperative joint congruency on long-term outcome of posterior malleolar fractures. Foot Ankle Int 36: 673, 2015.
-
15.
Still GP & Atwood TC: Operative outcome of 41 ankle fractures: a retrospective analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg 48: 330, 2009.
-
16.
Haraguchi N , Haruyama H & Toga H et al.: Pathoanatomy of posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88: 1085, 2006.
-
17.
Broos PLO & Bisschop APG: Operative treatment of ankle fractures in adults: correlation between types of fracture and final results. Injury 22: 403, 1991.
Factors Affecting the Clinical Outcomes of Surgically Treated Ankle Fractures Associated with the Posterior Malleolar Fragment
A Retrospective Analysis
Search for other papers by Mehmet Kuyumcu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emre Bilgin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hasan Bombacı in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background
This study was performed to determine the factors that influence the clinical outcomes of surgically treated ankle fractures associated with the posterior malleolus (PM).
Methods
We evaluated 42 fractures of 42 patients. Posterior malleolus fracture size was calculated using computed tomography. Posterior malleolar fractures with a size less than 10% were left nonfixated. The decision for larger fragments was performed using fluoroscopy following the fixation of other components. If the joint was found to be congruent, the PM was left nonfixated. Otherwise, the PM was reduced and fixated. Clinical outcomes were evaluated based on Weber, Freiburg, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores. Ankle osteoarthritis was determined according to the Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society classification. The effect of PM fixation, age, PM fragment size, waiting period before surgery, presence of ankle dislocation, and number of injured malleoli on clinical outcomes were assessed. Statistical significance was set at a value of P < .05.
Results
The mean patients age was 48.5 ± 14.9 years (range, 20–84 years) and the mean follow-up was 23.7 ± 8.6 months (range, 12–56 months). Fixation of the PM was performed solely in 12 patients. Postoperative displacement of the PM and articular step were less than 2 mm in all fractures. Statistically significant worse outcomes were demonstrated based on functional scores in the patients with a PM size greater than or equal to 25% (P = .042, P = .038, and P = .048, respectively) and in patients aged 60 years or older (P = .005, P = .007, and P = .018, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between functional scores and the other factors. Ankle osteoarthritis was observed at a higher rate in patients with PM size greater than or equal to 25% and in patients aged 60 years or older.
Conclusions
Clinical outcomes of the patients are mainly influenced by the patient's age and PM fragment size. However, if the tibiotalar joint is congruent, comparable results can be obtained in PM fixated or nonfixated patients.
Department of Othopaedics and Traumatology, Health Science University Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Othopaedics and Traumatology, Health Science University Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Department of Othopaedics and Traumatology, Health Science University Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Conflict of Interest: None reported.
advertising
