HallJP, BartonC, JonesPR, et al: The biomechanical differences between barefoot and shod distance running: a systematic review and preliminary meta-analysis. Sports Med43: 1335, 2012.10.1007/s40279-013-0084-3)| false
Van LaerhovenH, van der Zaag-LoonenHJ, DerkxBHF: A comparison of Likert scale and visual analogue scales as response options in children's questionnaires. Acta Paediatr93: 830, 2004.10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb03026.x15244235)| false
WelchA, CamusJ, DalzellN, et al: Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) of the heel bone and its correlates in men and women in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort: a cross-sectional population-based study. Osteoporos Int15: 217, 2004.
WelchA, CamusJ, DalzellN, et al: Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) of the heel bone and its correlates in men and women in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort: a cross-sectional population-based study. Osteoporos Int15: 217, 2004.1474548610.1007/s00198-003-1410-7)| false
WhitmanR: The classic: a study of the weak foot, with reference to its causes, its diagnosis, and its cure; with an analysis of a thousand cases of so-called flat-foot. 1896. Clin Orthop Relat Res468: 925, 2010.
WhitmanR: The classic: a study of the weak foot, with reference to its causes, its diagnosis, and its cure; with an analysis of a thousand cases of so-called flat-foot. 1896. Clin Orthop Relat Res468: 925, 2010.10.1007/s11999-009-1130-119856037)| false
ZhangX, DelabastitaT, LissensJ, et al: The morphology of foot soft tissues is associated with running shoe type in healthy recreational runners. J Sci Med Sport21: 686, 2018.10.1016/j.jsams.2017.11.00829239782)| false
Devereux-FitzgeraldA, PowellR, DewhurstA, et al: The acceptability of physical activity interventions to older adults: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Soc Sci Med158: 14, 2016.2710430710.1016/j.socscimed.2016.04.006)| false
SunX, LamWK, ZhangX, et al: Systematic review of the role of wootwear constructions in running biomechanics: implications for running-related injury and performance. J Sports Sci Med19: 20, 2020.32132824)| false
SamozinoP, RejcE, di PramperoPE, et al: Force-velocity properties’ contribution to bilateral deficit during ballistic push-off. Med Sci Sports Exerc46: 107, 2014.10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a124fb24346189)| false
ParfittG, RoseEA, BurgessWM: The psychological and physiological responses of sedentary individuals to prescribed and preferred intensity exercise. Br J Health Psychol11: 39, 2006.10.1348/135910705X4360616480554)| false
da Silva AzevedoAP, MezêncioB, AmadioAC, et al: 16 weeks of progressive barefoot running training changes impact force and muscle activation in habitual shod runners. PLoS One11: e0167234, 2006.10.1371/journal.pone.0167234)| false
Background: Perceived acceptability of barefoot use has largely been ignored in the literature despite its importance to long-term implementation and behavior change. This study aimed to compare the acceptability of undertaking weightbearing physical activities in regular running shoes versus barefoot in habitually shod individuals.
Methods: Healthy young men and women were recruited from the Gold Coast. Participants completed six activities (ie, lunges, walking, jogging, sidestep, vertical jump, and hop) in shod and barefoot conditions then answered questions pertaining to level and source of discomfort, ease of performance, and acceptability. Indices of bone quality were measured from their dominant calcaneus by quantitative ultrasound.
Results: Seventeen healthy male (n = 8) and female (n = 9) university students participated in the study (age, 26.59 ± 7.26 years; body mass index, 23.08 ± 3.58 kg/m2). Men were taller, heavier, and had higher broadband ultrasound attenuation than women (P < .05). For “no” discomfort, “very easy” ease of performance, and a “good amount” or “very good amount” of acceptability, the shod condition demonstrated response rates of 87.25%, 55.88%, and 72.55%, respectively. The barefoot condition demonstrated rates of those responses of 62.75%, 39.22%, and 48.03%, respectively, and reported more ball-of-foot, forefoot, heel, and plantar skin locations as sources of discomfort during activity than in the shod condition. The group vertical jump height was higher barefoot than shod (44.88 ± 8.44 cm and 43.25 ± 8.76 cm, respectively; P < .05), but no difference was seen for the hop. Men jumped and hopped higher than women under both footwear conditions (P < .05).
Conclusions: Participants initiating barefoot weightbearing exercise may experience slightly greater discomfort and less ease of performance in the initial transition from the shod condition, but may perform better in vertical jump. Whether those differences in experience persist over the long term will require longitudinal studies.
Corresponding author: Belinda R. Beck, PhD, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Gold Coast campus, Griffith University, QLD 4222, Australia. (E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org)