Lipner SR, Scher RK: Onychomycosis: clinical overview and diagnosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 80: 835, 2019.
Blake N, Zhu J, Hernandez G, et al: A retrospective review of diagnostic testing for onychomycosis of the foot. JAPMA 105: 503, 2015.
Lipner SR, Scher RK: Onychomycosis: current and investigational therapies. Cutis 94: E21, 2014.
Kaur R, Kashyap B, Bhalla P: Onychomycosis—epidemiology, diagnosis and management. Indian J Med Microbiol 26: 108, 2008.
Szepietowski JC, Reich A, Garlowska E, et al: Factors influencing coexistence of toenail onychomycosis with tinea pedis and other dermatomycoses: a survey of 2761 patients. Arch Dermatol 142: 1279, 2006.
Gupta AK, Daigle D, Paquet M: Therapies for onychomycosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of mycological cure. JAPMA 105: 357, 2015.
Malay DS, Yi S, Borowsky P, et al: Efficacy of debridement alone versus debridement combined with topical antifungal nail lacquer for the treatment of pedal onychomycosis: a randomized, controlled trial. J Foot Ankle Surg 48: 294, 2009.
Vlahovic TC, Joseph WS, Scher RK, et al: Diagnosis and management of onychomycosis: perspectives from a joint podiatric medicine–dermatology roundtable. JAPMA 106: 155, 2016.
Bodman MA: Point-of-care diagnosis of onychomycosis by dermoscopy. JAPMA 107: 413, 2017.
Lipner SR, Scher RK: Onychomycosis: treatment and prevention of recurrence. J Am Acad Dermatol 80: 853, 2019.
Medicaid.gov. National Average Drug Acquisition Cost. Available at: https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/prescription-drugs/pharmacy-pricing/index.html. Accessed October 10, 2021.
Garcia‐Doval I, Cabo F, Monteagudo B, et al: Clinical diagnosis of toenail onychomycosis is possible in some patients: cross‐sectional diagnostic study and development of a diagnostic rule. Br J Dermatol 163: 743, 2010.
Gupta AK, Versteeg SG, Shear NH: Confirmatory testing prior to initiating onychomycosis therapy is cost-effective. J Cutan Med Surg 22: 129, 2018.
Lin K, Lipner SR: Modeling of usage and estimation of cost for efinaconazole 10% topical solution in the treatment of onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 83: 227, 2020.
Background: Onychomycosis is the most common nail disease seen in clinical practice. Medication safety, severity of disease, comorbidities, concomitant medications, patient age, and cost are all important considerations when treating onychomycosis. Because cost may affect treatment decisions, we sought to analyze Medicaid formulary coverage of onychomycosis antifungals.
Methods: Public state Medicaid formularies were searched for coverage of US Food and Drug Administration–approved onychomycosis medications and off-label oral fluconazole. Total drug cost for a single great toenail was calculated using the National Average Drug Acquisition Cost. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to compare coverage and cost, mycologic cure rate, and complete cure rate.
Results: Oral terbinafine and off-label fluconazole were widely covered for onychomycosis treatment. There was poor coverage of oral itraconazole and topical ciclopirox, and there was no coverage of topical efinaconazole and tavaborole without step-edits or prior authorization. There was a significant negative correlation between medication coverage and cost (r = −0.758; P = .040). There was no correlation between medication coverage and mycologic (r = 0.548; P = .339) and complete (r = 0.768; P = .130) cure rates.
Conclusions: There is poor Medicaid coverage of antifungals for the treatment of onychomycosis, with step-edits and prior authorization based on cost rather than treatment safety and efficacy. We recommend involving podiatrists and dermatologists in developing criteria for insurance approval of onychomycosis treatments.