Saltzman CL, Kadoko RG, Suh JS: Treatment of isolated ankle osteoarthritis with arthrodesis or the total ankle replacement: a comparison of early outcomes. Clin Orthop Surg 2: 1, 2010.
Kim BS, Choi WJ, Kim YS, et al.: Total ankle replacement in moderate to severe varus deformity of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91: 1183, 2009.
Trajkovski T, Pinsker E, Cadden A, et al.: Outcomes of ankle arthroplasty with preoperative coronal-plane varus deformity of 10° or greater. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95: 1382, 2013.
Lee GW, Wang SH, Lee KB: Comparison of intermediate to long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty in ankles with preoperative varus, valgus, and neutral alignment. J Bone Joint Surg 100: 835, 2018.
Nunley JA, Caputo AM, Easley ME, et al.: Intermediate to long-term outcomes of the STAR total ankle replacement: the patient perspective. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94: 43, 2012.
Mann JA, Mann RA, Horton E: STAR ankle: long-term results. Foot Ankle Int 32: 473, 2011.
Doets HC, Brand R, Nelissen RGHH: Total ankle arthroplasty in inflammatory joint disease with use of two mobile-bearing designs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88: 1272, 2006.
Wood PLR, Sutton C, Mishra V, et al.: A randomised, controlled trial of two mobile-bearing total ankle replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91: 69, 2009.
Trincat S, Kouyoumdjian P, Asencio G: Total ankle arthroplasty and coronal plane deformities. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98: 75, 2012.
Usuelli FG, Di Silvestri CA, D’Ambrosi R, et al.: Total ankle replacement: is pre-operative varus deformity a predictor of poor survival rate and clinical and radiological outcomes? Int Orthop 43: 243, 2019.
Queen RM, Adams SB, Viens NA, et al.: Differences in outcomes following total ankle replacement in patients with neutral alignment compared with tibiotalar joint malalignment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95: 1927, 2013.
Lee GW, Lee KB: Outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty in ankles with >20° of coronal plane deformity. J Bone Joint Surg 101: 2203, 2019.
Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Sugimoto K, et al.: Ankle arthroplasty. A comparative study of cemented metal and uncemented ceramic prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 252: 209, 1990.
Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, et al.: Ankle arthroplasty using three generations of metal and ceramic prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 424: 130, 2004.
Nagashima M, Takahashi H, Kakumoto S, et al.: Total ankle arthroplasty for deformity of the foot in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using the TNK ankle system: clinical results of 21 cases. Mod Rheumatol 14: 48, 2004.
Zhao HM, Wen XD, Zhang Y, et al.: Supramalleolar osteotomy with medial distraction arthroplasty for ankle osteoarthritis with talar tilt. J Orthop Surg Res 14: 1, 2019.
Niki H, Aoki H, Inokuchi S, et al.: Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders II: interclinician and intraclinician reliability and validity of the newly established standard rating scales and Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 10: 466, 2005.
Niki H, Aoki H, Inokuchi S, et al.: Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders I: development of standard rating system. J Orthop Sci 10: 457, 2005.
Niki H, Tatsunami S, Haraguchi N, et al.: Validity and reliability of a self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q). J Orthop Sci 18: 298, 2013.
Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, et al.: Low tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Results of a new operation in 18 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77: 50, 1995.
Hintermann B, Valderrabano V, Dereymaeker G, et al.: The HINTEGRA ankle: rationale and short-term results of 122 consecutive ankles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 424: 57, 2004.
Doets HC, van der Plaat LW, Klein JP: Medial malleolar osteotomy for the correction of varus deformity during total ankle arthroplasty: results in 15 ankles. Foot Ankle Int 29: 171, 2008.
Kim BS, Knupp M, Zwicky L, et al.: Total ankle replacement in association with hindfoot fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92: 1540, 2010.
Jung HG, Jeon SH, Kim TH, et al.: Total ankle arthroplasty with combined calcaneal and metatarsal osteotomies for treatment of ankle osteoarthritis with accompanying cavovarus deformities: early results. Foot Ankle Int 34: 140, 2013.
Pagenstert GI, Hintermann B, Barg A, et al.: Realignment surgery as alternative treatment of varus and valgus ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 462: 156, 2007.
Gaudot F, Colombier JA, Bonnin M, et al.: A controlled, comparative study of a fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 35: 131, 2014.
Clough TM, Alvi F, Majeed H: Total ankle arthroplasty: what are the risks? Bone Joint J 100: 1352, 2018.
Kurup HV, Taylor GR: Medial impingement after ankle replacement. Int Orthop 32: 243, 2008.
Background: It remains controversial whether satisfactory outcomes can be obtained following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) without osteotomy in patients with severe varus ankle deformities. This study aimed to examine outcomes following TAA without concomitant osteotomies in patients with severe varus ankle alignment by comparing them with those in patients with neutral alignment.
Methods: Fifty-one patients (53 ankles; mean age, 71.4 ± 5.6 years) who underwent TAA using the TNK ankle prosthesis were examined (mean follow-up, 36.8 ± 17.8 months). Patients were allocated into groups according to the preoperative talar tilt (TT) angle: the neutral group (preoperative TT angle <10°; n = 37) and the varus group (preoperative TT angle ≥10°; n = 16). Outcome measures, including the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot scale, Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire, ankle range of motion, and radiographic parameters, were assessed before surgery and at the final follow-up.
Results: Significant improvements were observed in clinical and radiographic outcomes in both groups after surgery. Postoperative Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot scale and subscale scores of pain and shoes in the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire were not significantly different between the groups, whereas subscale scores of function, social, and health were greater in the varus group than in the neutral group at the final follow-up. Radiographic parameters, including TT angle and tibial axis-medial malleolus (TMM) angle, improved postoperatively and were not significantly different between the neutral (mean TT angle, 0.5 ± 0.7°; mean TMM angle, 16.0 ± 4.6°) and varus (meanTT angle, 0.4 ± 0.7°; meanTMM angle, 17.0 ± 5.3°) groups at the final follow-up. To achieve neutral alignment, adjunctive procedures were required more often in the varus group.
Conclusions: Outcomes of TAA using the TNK ankle prosthesis were favorable in patients with severe varus ankle and in those with neutral ankle without concomitant osteotomy. Satisfactory outcomes could be achieved in patients with severe varus ankle alignment after TAA without concomitant osteotomy.