Androsoni R, Apostolico Netto A, Macedo RR, et al.: Treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis with extra corporeal shock wave therapy: ultrasonographic morphological aspect and functional evaluation. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 48: 538, 2013.
Wearing SC, Smeathers JE, Sullivan PM, et al.: Plantar fasciitis: are pain and fascial thickness associated with arch shape and loading? Phys Ther 87: 1002, 2007.
Martin RL, Davenport TE, Reischl SF, et al.: Heel pain—plantar fasciitis: revision 2014. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 44: A1, 2014.
Irving DB, Cook JL, Young MA, et al.: Impact of chronic plantar heel pain on health-related quality of life. JAPMA 98: 283, 2008.
Cotchett M, Lennecke A, Medica VG, et al.: The association between pain catastrophising and kinesiophobia with pain and function in people with plantar heel pain. The Foot 32: 8, 2017.
Looney B, Srokose T, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, et al.: Graston instrument soft tissue mobilization and home stretching for the management of plantar heel pain: a case series. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 34: 138, 2011.
Thompson JV, Saini SS, Reb CW, et al.: Diagnosis and management of plantar fasciitis. J Am Osteopath Assoc 114: 900, 2014.
Berbrayer D, Fredericson M: Update on evidence-based treatments for plantar fasciopathy. PM R 6: 159, 2014.
Schneider HP, Baca JM, Carpenter BB, et al.: American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons clinical consensus statement: diagnosis and treatment of adult acquired infracalcaneal heel pain. J Foot Ankle Surg 57: 370, 2018.
Sun K, Zhou H, Jiang W: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus other therapeutic methods for chronic plantar fasciitis. J Foot Ankle Surg 26: 33, 2020.
Li X, Zhang L, Gu S, et al.: Comparative effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave, ultrasound, low-level laser therapy, noninvasive interactive neurostimulation, and pulsed radiofrequency treatment for treating plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine 97: 43, 2018.
Roerdink RL, Dietvorst M, van der Zwaard B, et al.: Complications of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in plantar fasciitis: systematic review. Int J Surg 46: 133, 2017.
Lambert M, Hitchcock R, Lavallee K, et al.: The effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization compared to other interventions on pain and function: a systematic review. Phys Ther Rev 22: 76, 2017.
Baker RT, Nasypany A, Seegmiller JG, et al.: Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization treatment for tissue extensibility dysfunction. Int J Athl Ther Train 18: 16, 2013.
Kim J, Sung DJ, Lee J: Therapeutic effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization for soft tissue injury: mechanisms and practical application. J Exerc Rehabil 13: 12, 2017.
Nekouzadeh A, Pryse KM, Elson EL et al.: Stretch-activated force shedding, force recovery, and cytoskeletal remodeling in contractile fibroblasts. J Biomech 41: 2964, 2008.
Daniels CJ, Morrell AP: Chiropractic management of pediatric plantar fasciitis: a case report. J Chiropr Med 11: 58, 2012.
Ajimsha MS, Binsu D, Chithra S: Effectiveness of myofascial release in the management of plantar heel pain: a randomized controlled trial. The Foot 24: 66, 2014.
Akınoğlu B, Köse N: A comparison of the acute effects of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy, ultrasound therapy, and exercise therapy in plantar fasciitis. J Exerc Rehabil 14: 306, 2018.
Sanmak ÖDY, Külcü DG, Mesci N, et al.: Comparison of effects of low-level laser therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a randomized, prospective, single-blind clinical study. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil 65: 184, 2019.
Carlsson AM: Assessment of chronic pain: I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 16: 87, 1983.
Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE: Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med 38: 633, 2001.
Yaliman A, Sen EI, Eskiyurt N, et al.: Turkish translation and adaptation of foot function index in patients with plantar fasciitis. Turk J Physical Med Rehabil 60: 212, 2014.
Landorf KB, Radford JA: Minimal important difference: values for the foot health status questionnaire, foot function index and visual analogue scale. The Foot 18: 15, 2008.
Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD: A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34: 220, 1996.
Yilmaz O, Yakut Y, Uygur F, et al.: Turkish version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and its test-retest reliability. Turk J Physiother Rehabil 22: 44, 2011.
Çil ET, Şaylı U, Subaşı F: Outpatient vs home management protocol results for plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int 40: 1295, 2019.
Çelik D, Kuş G, Sırma SÖ: Joint mobilization and stretching exercise vs steroid injection in the treatment of plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled study. Foot Ankle Int 37: 150, 2016.
Rompe JD, Furia J, Cacchio A, et al.: Radial shock wave treatment alone is less efficient than radial shock wave treatment combined with tissue-specific plantar fascia-stretching in patients with chronic plantar heel pain. Int J Surg Open 24: 135, 2015.
Kamonseki DH, Gonçalves GA, Liu CY, et al.: Effect of stretching with and without muscle strengthening exercises for the foot and hip in patients with plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial. Man Ther 23: 76, 2016.
Sanzo P, Oakley E: A randomized clinical trial on the effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy, joint mobilizations and exercise on plantar heel pain in patients with plantar fasciitis. J Sports Sci 4: 27, 2014.
Carey-Loghmani MT, Schrader JW, Hammer WI: Clinical Foundations for Graston Technique® Adapted from: Graston Technique® M1 Instruction Manual, Graston Technique, Indianapolis, IN, 2018.
Cheatham SW, Baker R, Kreiswirth E: Instrument assisted soft-tissue mobilization: a commentary on clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation professionals. Int J Sports Phys 14: 670, 2019.
Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF: Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 27: 178, 1989.
Fraser JJ, Corbett R, Donner C, et al.: Does manual therapy improve pain and function in patients with plantar fasciitis? a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther 26: 55, 2018.
Grim C, Kramer R, Engelhardt M, et al.: Effectiveness of manual therapy, customised foot orthoses and combined therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: a RCT. Sports 7: 128, 2019.
Sillevis R, Shamus E, Mouttet B: The management of plantar fasciitis with a musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging guided approach for instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization in a runner: a case report. Int J Sports Phys Ther 15: 274, 2020.
Jones ER, Finley MA, Fruth SJ, et al.: Instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization for the management of chronic plantar heel pain: a pilot study. JAPMA 109: 193, 2019.
Background: Although there are studies showing that extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization methods are effective in chronic plantar heel pain (CPHP) treatment, there is a need for studies comparing these techniques. We compared the effectiveness of ESWT versus instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization using Graston Technique (GT) instruments in addition to stretching exercises (SEs) in CPHP.
Methods: Sixty-nine patients were randomly assigned to three groups: ESWT+SEs (group 1), GT+SEs (group 2), and SEs only (control group) (ratio, 1:1:1). The SEs, twice daily for 8 weeks, were standard for all. Group 1 received low-intensity ESWT; in group 2, GT was the selected method. Visual analog scales (for initial step and activity pain), the Foot Function Index (FFI), the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia were used pretreatment, posttreatment, and at 8-week and 6-month follow-up.
Results: Visual analog scale and FFI scores improved posttreatment and during follow-up in all groups (P < .001). Although effect sizes were greater in groups 1 and 2 than in the control group in initial step pain posttreatment and at 8-week follow-up, group 2 had the highest effect size at 6 months. Mean SF-12 scores in groups 1 and 2 improved on the posttreatment assessment. Furthermore, group 2 showed significant improvements in FFI scores compared with the other groups at 6-month follow-up (F = 6.33; P = .003).
Conclusions: Although ESWT+SEs and GT+SEs seem to have similar effects on initial step pain posttreatment and at 8-week follow-up, GT+SEs was found most effective for improving functional status at 6 months in the management of CPHP.