• 1

    Wu Y, He QF, Lai LP, et al.: Functional outcome of pronation-external rotation-Weber C ankle fractures with supracollicular medial malleolar fracture treated with or without syndesmotic screws: a retrospective comparative cohort study. Chin Med J (Engl) 131: 2551, 2018.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J, Wilson G: Adult ankle fractures—an increasing problem? Acta Orthop Scand 69: 43, 1998.

  • 3

    Haraguchi N, Haruyama H, Toga H, et al.: Pathoanatomy of posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88: 1085, 2006.

  • 4

    Drijfhout van Hooff CC, Verhage SM, Hoogendoorn JM: Influence of fragment size and postoperative joint congruency on long-term outcome of posterior malleolar fractures. Foot Ankle Int 36: 673, 2015.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Shi HF, Xiong J, Chen YX, et al.: Comparison of the direct and indirect reduction techniques during the surgical management of posterior malleolar fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18: 109, 2017.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Xu H, Li X, Zhang D, et al.: A retrospective study of posterior malleolus fractures. Int Orthop 36: 1929, 2012.

  • 7

    Verhage SM, Krijnen P, Schipper IB, et al.: Persistent postoperative step-off of the posterior malleolus leads to higher incidence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis in trimalleolar fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139: 323, 2019.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    O’Connor TJ, Mueller B, Ly TV, et al.: “A to p” screw versus posterolateral plate for posterior malleolus fixation in trimalleolar ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 29: e151, 2015.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Verhage SM, Boot F, Schipper IB, et al.: Open reduction and internal fixation of posterior malleolar fractures using the posterolateral approach. Bone Joint J 98-B: 812, 2016.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Little MTM, Berkes MB, Lazaro LE, et al.: Complications following treatment of supination external rotation ankle fractures through the posterolateral approach. Foot Ankle Int 34: 523, 2013.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Forberger J, Sabandal PV, Dietrich M, et al.: Posterolateral approach to the displaced posterior malleolus: functional outcome and local morbidity. Foot Ankle Int 30: 309, 2009.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Hoogendoorn JM: Posterior malleolar open reduction and internal fixation through a posterolateral approach for trimalleolar fractures. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 7: e31, 2017.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    van Dijk CN, Verhagen RA, Tol JL: Arthroscopy for problems after ankle fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79: 280, 1997.

  • 14

    Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, et al.: Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15: 349, 1994.

  • 15

    Ibrahim T, Beiri A, Azzabi M, et al.: Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales. J Foot Ankle Surg 46: 65, 2007.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Hartford JM, Gorczyca JT, McNamara JL, et al.: Tibiotalar contact area. Contribution of posterior malleolus and deltoid ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 320: 182, 1995.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Tosun B, Selek O, Gok U, et al.: Posterior malleolus fractures in trimalleolar ankle fractures: malleolus versus transyndesmal fixation. Indian J Orthop 52: 309, 2018.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Odak S, Ahluwalia R, Unnikrishnan P, et al.: Management of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg 55: 140, 2016.

  • 19

    Abarquero-Diezhandino A, Luengo-Alonso G, Alonso-Tejero D, et al.: Study of the relation between the posterior malleolus fracture and the development of osteoarthritis. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 64: 41, 2020.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Li M, Collier RC, Hill BW, et al.: Comparing different surgical techniques for addressing the posterior malleolus in supination external rotation ankle fractures and the need for syndesmotic screw fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg 56: 730, 2017.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Anwar A, Zhang Z, Lv D, et al.: Biomechanical efficacy of AP, PA lag screws and posterior plating for fixation of posterior malleolar fractures: a three dimensional finite element study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19: 73, 2018.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Bennett C, Behn A, Daoud A, et al.: Buttress plating versus anterior-to-posterior lag screws for fixation of the posterior malleolus: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma 30: 664, 2016.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Li Y, Liu S, Jia J, et al.: Choice of internal fixation methods for posterior malleolus fracture in both biomechanics and clinical application. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 43: 718, 2011.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Xu C, Wen XX, Huang LY, et al.: Reliability of the Footscan platform system in healthy subjects: a comparison of without top-layer and with top-layer protocols. Biomed Res Int 2017: 2708712, 2017.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Impact of Posterior Malleolus Fixation on Clinical and Functional Results

Olgun Bingol Ankara City Hospital, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Üniversiteler Mah, Ankara, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Olgun Bingol in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Guzelali Ozdemir Ankara City Hospital, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Üniversiteler Mah, Ankara, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Guzelali Ozdemir in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Taner Karlidag Ankara City Hospital, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Üniversiteler Mah, Ankara, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Taner Karlidag in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Alperen Korucu Ankara City Hospital, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Üniversiteler Mah, Ankara, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Alperen Korucu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Niyazi Erdem Yasar Ankara City Hospital, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Üniversiteler Mah, Ankara, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Niyazi Erdem Yasar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
, and
Alper Deveci Ankara Private Ortadogu Hospital, Orthopaedics and Traumatology Clinic, Ankara, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Alper Deveci in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD

Background: Clinical studies have shown that posterior malleolar fractures treated with a posterior buttress plate have improved outcomes compared to anterior-to-posterior screw fixation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of posterior malleolus fixation on clinical and functional results.

Methods: The patients with posterior malleolar fractures who were treated between January of 2014 and April of 2018 at our hospital were investigated retrospectively. Fifty-five patients included in the study were divided into three groups according to the fixation preferences of fractures (group I, posterior buttress plate; group II, anterior-to-posterior screw; and group III, nonfixated). The groups consisted of 20, nine, and 26 patients, respectively. These patients were analyzed according to demographic data, fixation preferences of fractures, mechanism of injury, hospitalization length of stay, surgical time, syndesmosis screw use, follow-up time, complications, Haraguchi fracture classification, van Dijk classification, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score, and plantar pressure analysis.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of gender, operation side, injury mechanism, length of stay, anesthesia types, and syndesmotic screw usage. However, when the age, follow-up time, operation time, complications, Haraguchi classification, van Dijk classification, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores were evaluated, statistically significant differences were observed between the groups. Plantar pressure analysis data showed that group I yielded balanced pressure distribution between both feet compared to the other study groups.

Conclusions: The posterior buttress plating of posterior malleolar fractures yielded better clinical and functional outcomes compared to the anterior-to-posterior screw fixation and nonfixated groups.

Corresponding author: Olgun Bingol, MD, Ankara City Hospital, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Üniversiteler Mah, Ankara 06000, Turkey. (E-mail: olgunbingol@gmail.com)
Save