• 1

    League AC: Current concepts review: plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int 29: 358, 2008.

  • 2

    Schwartz EN, Su J: Plantar fasciitis: a concise review. Perm J 18: e105, 2014.

  • 3

    Rhim HC, Kwon J, Park J, et al.: A systematic review of systematic reviews on the epidemiology, evaluation, and treatment of plantar fasciitis. Life (Basel) 11: 1287, 2021.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Beyzadeoğlu M, Sağer O, Dinçoğlan F, et al.: Evaluation of the radiotherapeutic management of refractory painful heel spur and plantar fasciitis: a single center experience of 45 years. Gulhane Med J 62: 8, 2020.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Menz HB, Thomas MJ, Marshall M, et al.: Coexistence of plantar calcaneal spurs and plantar fascial thickening in individuals with plantar heel pain. Rheumatology (Oxford) 58: 237, 2019.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Nawaz A, Khan U, Zaheer A, et al.: Prevalence of heel spur in teachers. Available at: https://hpej.net/journals/PJPT/issue/view/105. Accessed November 16, 2022.

  • 7

    Kunze KN, Krivicich LM, Verma NN, et al.: Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for the meniscus: a YouTube-based quality-control study. Arthroscopy 36: 233, 2020.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Ferhatoglu MF, Kartal A, Ekici U, et al.: Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in sleeve gastrectomy videos shared on open access video sharing platform YouTube. Obes Surg 29: 1477, 2019.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Akpolat AO, Kurdal DP: Is quality of YouTube content on Bankart lesion and its surgical treatment adequate? J Orthop Surg Res 15: 1, 2020.

  • 10

    Koller U, Waldstein W, Schatz KD, et al.: YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis. Int Orthop 40: 1995, 2016.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Kuru T, Erken HY: Evaluation of the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on rotator cuff tears. Cureus 12: e6852, 2020.

  • 12

    Johal KS, Milner SA: Plantar fasciitis and the calcaneal spur: fact or fiction? Foot Ankle Surg 18: 39, 2012.

  • 13

    Erdem MN, Karaca S: Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine 15: E1334, 2018.

  • 14

    Kaya E, Görmez S: Quality and readability of online information on plantar fasciitis and calcaneal spur. Rheumatol Int 42: 1965, 2022.

  • 15

    Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, et al.: DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 53: 105, 1999.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA: Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: caveant lector et viewor—let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 277: 1244, 1997.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP: YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis: a wakeup call? J Rheumatol 39: 899, 2012.

  • 18

    American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons: Plantar fascitis. Available at: https://orthoinfo.aaos.org/globalassets/pdfs/plantar-fasciitis.pdf. Accessed May 23, 2023.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Sari E, Umur LF: Quality analysis of hallux valgus videos on YouTube. JAPMA 111: 1, 2021.

  • 20

    Foster BK, Malarkey WM, Maurer TC, et al.: Distal biceps tendon rupture videos on YouTube: an analysis of video content and quality. J Hand Surg Glob Online 4: 3, 2021.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Umur L, Sürücü S: Are YouTube videos a sufficient resource for informing patients in the treatment of rotator cuff tears? J Health Sci Med 5: 99, 2022.

  • 22

    Etzel CM, Bokshan SL, Forster TA, et al.: A quality assessment of YouTube content on shoulder instability. Phys Sportsmed 24: 1, 2021.

  • 23

    Ozdemir O, Diren F, Boyali O, et al.: Metric evaluation of reliability and transparency of the videos about carpal tunnel syndrome surgery in the online platforms: assessment of YouTube videos’ content. Neurospine 18: 363, 2021.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Uzun M, Cingoz T, Duran ME, et al.: The videos on YouTube related to hallux valgus surgery have insufficient information. Foot Ankle Surg 28: 414, 2022.

  • 25

    Jildeh TR, Abbas MJ, Abbas L, et al.: YouTube is a poor-quality source for patient information on rehabilitation and return to sports after hip arthroscopy. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 14: e1055, 2021.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Hatipoğlu S, Şenel FV: Does YouYube offer reliable information about mini screws? J Dent Res Rev 8: 90, 2021.

YouTube Videos About Plantar Fasciitis and Calcaneal Spurs Are Insufficient and Poor Quality

Ali Yüce Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Ali Yüce in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Olcayto Ocak Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Olcayto Ocak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Volkan Gur Erzincan University Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Volkan Gur in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
, and
Abdulhamit Misir Private Safa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Abdulhamit Misir in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD

Background: Patients frequently use YouTube to learn about their illness. For this reason, the educational and quality of YouTube videos about various diseases has been investigated. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy and quality of YouTube videos.

Methods: A standard query was performed on the YouTube database using the following search terms: Plantar fasciitis, heel spur, and calcaneal spur. For each search term, the top 50 videos determined by YouTube’s “relevance” according to its algorithm were evaluated (150 videos in total). After exclusion, 140 videos were included in the study. These videos were watched by 2 observers and the videos were evaluated and scored according to the Global Quality Score (GQS), DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and Plantar Fasciitis and Calcaneal Spurs Specific Score (PFSS) scoring systems.

Results: According to the JAMA criteria, 76.42% of the videos and 43.57% of the videos according to the GQS scored 2 points or less. According to DISCERN criteria, 67.15% of the videos were evaluated as very poor/poor. According to the PFSS, 83.5% of the videos were rated as poor or very poor.

Conclusions: These findings can be interpreted as the general information content of the videos about plantar fasciitis is insufficient and their reliability and quality are low. As a result, it can be concluded that the quality and reliability of YouTube videos regarding plantar fasciitis are insufficient for patients. Universities/associations prepare videos that provide information about plantar fasciitis to patients, and that these videos are presented on certain platforms can be a solution.

Corresponding author: Ali Yüce, MD, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Darülaceze St no. 27, Istanbul 34384, Turkey. (E-mail: dr_aliyuce@hotmail.com)
Save