Advertisement
-
1
National Evidence-Based Guideline on Prevention, Identification and Management of Foot Complications in Diabetes, Commonwealth of Australia, Melbourne, 2011.
-
2
Tan L: The clinical use of the 10g monofilament and its limitations: a review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 90: 1, 2010.
-
3
Wang F, Zhang J, Yu J et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Res 2017: 8787261, 2017.
-
4
Waldman S, Terzic A: Health care evolves from reactive to proactive. Clin Pharmacol Ther 105: 10, 2019.
-
5
Akbari M, Jafari H, Moshashaee A et al.: Do diabetic neuropathy patients benefit from balance training? J Rehabil Res Dev 49: 333, 2012.
-
6
Timar B, Timar R, Gaita L et al.: The impact of diabetic neuropathy on balance and on the risk of falls in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study. PloS One 11: e0154654, 2016.
-
7
Brown SJ, Handsaker JC, Bowling FL et al.: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy compromises balance during daily activities. Diabetes Care 38: 1116, 2015.
-
8
Khalaf K, Al-Angari HM, Khandoker AH et al.: Gait alterations in the UAE population with and without diabetic complications using both traditional and entropy measures. Gait Posture 58: 71, 2017.
-
9
Raspovic A: Gait characteristics of people with diabetes-related peripheral neuropathy, with and without a history of ulceration. Gait Posture 38: 723, 2013.
-
10
Timar B, Timar R, Schiller A et al.: Impact of neuropathy on the adherence to diabetes-related self-care activities: a cross-sectional study. Patient Prefer Adherence 10: 1169, 2016.
-
11
Vileikyte L, Leventhal H, Gonzalez J et al.: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy and depressive symptoms. Diabetes Care 28: 2378, 2005.
-
12
Hewston P, Deshpande N: Falls and balance impairments in older adults with type 2 diabetes: thinking beyond diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Can J Diabetes 40: 6, 2016.
-
13
Rawaf S: A proactive general practice: integrating public health into primary care. London J Prim Care 10: 17, 2018.
-
14
Fredericks S, Lapum J, Hui G: Examining the effect of patient-centred care on outcomes. Br J Nurs 24: 394, 2015.
-
15
Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council: National Strategic Framework for Chronic Conditions, Australian Government, Canberra, 2017.
-
16
Grady JL, Entin EB, Entin EE et al.: Using message framing to achieve long-term behavioral changes in persons with diabetes. Appl Nurs Res 24: 22, 2011.
-
17
Riskowski J, Hagedorn T, Hannan M: Measures of foot function, foot health, and foot pain: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Lower Limb Outcomes Assessment: Foot and Ankle Module (AAOS-FAM), Bristol Foot Score (BFS), Revised Foot Function Index (FFI-R), Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ), Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index (MFPDI), Podiatric Health Questionnaire (PHQ), and Rowan Foot Pain Assessment (ROFPAQ). Arthritis Care Res 63 (suppl 11):S229, 2011.
-
18
Menz HB, Auhl M, Ristevski S et al.: Comparison of the responsiveness of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire and the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index in older people. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12: 158, 2014.
-
19
Bus SA, Lavery LA, Monteiro-Soares M et al.: IWGDF Guideline on the Prevention of Foot Ulcers in Persons with Diabetes, The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot, 2019.
-
20
Boulton A, Armstrong D, Albert S et al.: Comprehensive foot examination and risk assessment: a report of the task force of the foot care interest group of the American Diabetes Association, with endorsement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. Diabetes Care 31: 1679, 2008.
-
21
Spruce M: “Neurological Assessment,” in Yates B, ed. Merriman’s Assessment of the Lower Limb, 3rd Ed, Churchill Livingstone, China, 2009.
-
22
Nather A, Keng Lin W, Aziz Z et al.: Assessment of sensory neuropathy in patients with diabetic foot problems. Diabet Foot Ankle [June 16, 2011; doi: http://10.3402/dfa.v2i0.6367].
-
23
Goddard K, Vas P, Purves A et al.: Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simple tests to screen for diabetic peripheral neuropathy: protocol for a cross-sectional study. JMIR Res Protoc 7: e72, 2018.
-
24
Lanting SM, Spink MJ, Tehan PE et al.: Non-invasive assessment of vibration perception and protective sensation in people with diabetes mellitus: inter- and intra-rater reliability. J Foot Ankle Res 13: 3, 2020.
-
25
Fernández-Torres R, Ruiz-Muñoz M, Pérez-Panero AJ et al.: Instruments of choice for assessment and monitoring diabetic foot: a systematic review. J Clin Med 9: 602, 2020.
-
26
Pop-Busui R, Boulton AJM, Feldman EL et al.: Diabetic neuropathy: a position statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 40: 136, 2017.
-
28
Kim H-Y: Statistical notes for clinical researchers: effect size. Restor Dent Endod 40: 328, 2015.
-
29
Tomczak M, Tomczak E: The need to report effect size estimates revisited: an overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends Sport Sci 1: 19, 2014.
-
30
Maher JM, Markey JC, Ebert-May D: The other half of the story: effect size analysis in quantitative research. CBE Life Sci Educ 12: 345, 2013.
-
31
Australian Bureau of Statistics: Chronic conditions. Available at: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/health-conditions-and-risks/chronic-conditions/latest-release#data-download. Published 2018. Accessed July, 23, 2021.
-
32
Webbie K, O’Brien K: “Use of Medicines by Australians with Diabetes,” in AIHW Bulletin, Vol 45, AIHW, Canberra, Australia, 2006.
-
33
Harding JL, Shaw JE, Peeters A et al.: Mortality trends among people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in Australia: 1997–2010. Diabetes Care 37: 2579, 2014.
-
34
AIHW. Rural and remote health. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/rural-remote-australians/rural-and-remote-health. Accessed September 7, 2023.
-
35
Riandini T, Wee HL, Khoo EYH et al.: Functional status mediates the association between peripheral neuropathy and health-related quality of life in individuals with diabetes. Acta Diabetol 55: 155, 2018.
-
36
Donato AJ, Tench K, Glueck DH et al.: Declines in physiological functional capacity with age: a longitudinal study in peak swimming performance. J Appl Physiol 94: 764, 2003.
-
37
McInnes A, Jeffcoate W, Vileikyte L et al.: Foot care education in patients with diabetes at low risk of complications: a consensus statement. Diabet Med 28: 162, 2011.
-
38
Speight J, Conn J, Dunning T et al.: Diabetes Australia position statement: a new language for diabetes: improving communications with and about people with diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 97: 425, 2012.
-
39
WA Department of Health: High Risk Model of Care, Perth Health Networks Branch, Western Australia, 2010.
-
40
Emad M, Arjmand H, Farpour HR et al.: Lipid-lowering drugs (statins) and peripheral neuropathy. Electron Physician 10: 6527, 2018.
Do Basic Neurologic Assessments Tell Us More Than We Realize?
Search for other papers by Luke Donnan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emma Baker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anna Horn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Caroline Robinson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background: Neurologic assessments using a monofilament and a tuning fork are routinely performed to screen for peripheral neuropathy and to identify foot ulceration and amputation risks. We investigated whether assessments commonly used to monitor sensation in the feet may illuminate a more holistic perspective of a person’s overall health status.
Methods: Recruitment of 50 participants for foot health screening was facilitated via a promotional event for Foot Health Week. Participants were aged 52 to 92 years (31 women and 19 men). Monofilament and tuning fork assessments were used to determine each participant’s neurologic status. Participants also completed a modified Foot Health Status Questionnaire. Data were analyzed to identify correlations between neurologic assessment results and questionnaire responses.
Results: For participants self-reporting an “excellent” health rating, a significant relationship was identified with adequate vibration sensation (P < .01). Significant correlations were also identified between a greater number of sites detected using a 10-g monofilament assessment and a person’s experience of having a lot of energy (P = .03), limited interference with social activities (P = .03), and greater confidence completing a variety of functional tasks.
Conclusions: Significant correlations were observed between basic neurologic assessments and a participant’s perception of their overall health. Although these findings reflect a correlational rather than a causational relationship, they may provide a stimulus for clinicians to reflect on the holistic value of peripheral neurologic assessment. Although the immediate focus for a practitioner is minimizing risk and preserving tissue viability, neurologic test results may be useful to stimulate further discussion about a patient’s health outcomes by exploring issues beyond the presenting condition.
