Chang Y, Cesarman E, Pessin MS, et al: Identification of herpesvirus-like DNA sequences in aids-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma. Science 266: 1865, 1994.
Kaposi M: Idiopathisches multiples pigmentsarkom der haut. Arch Dermatol Syph 4: 265, 1872.
Etemad SA, Dewan AK: Kaposi sarcoma updates. Dermatol Clin 37: 505, 2019.
Steinfeld AD, Cooper JS: Epidemic and classic Kaposi’s sarcoma of the feet. A comparative study. JAPMA 80: 469, 1990.
Mosam A, Aboobaker J, Shaik F: Kaposi’s sarcoma in sub-Saharan africa: a current perspective. Curr Opin Infect Dis 23: 119, 2010.
Schneider JW, Dittmer DP: Diagnosis and treatment of Kaposi sarcoma. Am J Clin Dermatol 18: 529, 2017.
Berlin SJ, Clancy JT, Giordano ML: Kaposi’s sarcoma of the foot. A review and report of 156 cases. JAPMA 79: 311, 1989.
Bohlius J, Valeri F, Maskew M, et al: Kaposi’s sarcoma in HIV-infected patients in South Africa: multicohort study in the antiretroviral therapy era. Int J Cancer 135: 2644, 2014.
Taylor JF, Templeton AC, Vogel CL, et al: Kaposi’s sarcoma in Uganda: a clinico-pathological study. Int J Cancer 8: 122, 1971.
Gbabe OF, Okwundu CI, Dedicoat M, et al: Treatment of severe or progressive Kaposi’s sarcoma in HIV-infected adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9: CD003256, 2014.
Tourlaki A, Germiniasi F, Rossi LC, et al: Paclitaxel as first- or second-line treatment for HIV-negative Kaposi’s sarcoma: a retrospective study of 58 patients. J Dermatolog Treat 31: 183, 2020.
Brambilla L, Romanelli A, Bellinvia M, et al: Weekly paclitaxel for advanced aggressive classic Kaposi sarcoma: experience in 17 cases. Br J Dermatol 158: 1339, 2008.
Moosa MR: Kaposi’s sarcoma in kidney transplant recipients: a 23-year experience. QJM 98: 205, 2005.
Rubenstein SA, Jenkin WM, Conant MA, et al: Disseminated Kaposi’s sarcoma in male homosexuals. J Am Podiatry Assoc 73: 413, 1983.
Korekawa A, Kaneko T, Nakano H, et al: Pyogenic granuloma-like Kaposi’s sarcoma on the first toe. J Dermatol 45: e177, 2018.
Lee MK, Ku SH, Cho EB, et al: Unusual case of pyogenic granuloma-like Kaposi’s sarcoma on the sole. J Dermatol 42: 425, 2015.
Torrence GM, Wrobel JS: A case of mistaken identity: classic Kaposi sarcoma misdiagnosed as a diabetic foot ulcer in an atypical patient. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol 5: 8, 2019.
Soleymani T, Bennett RG: Mohs micrographic surgery for exophytic Kaposi sarcoma. Dermatol Surg 46: 1232, 2020.
Background: Kaposi sarcoma (KS) has multiple clinical variants, and most frequently presents on the lower extremities. Anti–human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) therapy has significantly reduced the incidence of KS. However, KS is still prevalent in both HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients. This case series analysis aims to reveal the clinical presentations, differential diagnosis, and treatment options of KS on the foot and ankle.
Methods: Eleven cases of KS involving the foot and ankle were retrieved from our patient database, and their clinicopathologic features were analyzed.
Results: All patients were men, aged 29 to 85 years. Two types of KS were found: classic and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome–associated epidemic. The average ages of classic and epidemic KS were 65.7 and 41.8 years, respectively. Clinically, three patients manifested multiple erythematous or deep violaceous, or blue-violaceous macules on either the dorsal or plantar surfaces of both feet. Eight patients showed exophytic, pyogenic granuloma-like nodules on the plantar surface, heels, and toes. Histologically, all KSs had uniform intervening fascicles of elongated spindle cells with slit-like vascular spaces filled with red blood cells and immunoreactivity with human herpesvirus-8. The patients were treated according to HIV infection status. Human immunodeficiency virus–infected patients were treated with anti-HIV therapy after primary surgical excision or biopsy. Human immunodeficiency virus–negative patients were treated with either surgical excision, Mohs surgery, or a combination of surgical excision and local radiotherapy according to individual patient clinical presentation.
Conclusions: Kaposi sarcoma is still prevalent in both HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients with a variety of clinical presentations. Biopsy, with histologic evaluation, in combination with immunohistochemistry is essential for the differential diagnosis. The patient should be treated according their clinical manifestation, staging, comorbidity, and immune function.