• 1.

    Cutts S, Obi N, Pasapula C, et al: Plantar fasciitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94: 539, 2012.

  • 2.

    Goff JD, Crawford R: Diagnosis and treatment of plantar fasciitis. Am Fam Physician 84: 676, 2011.

  • 3.

    League AC: Current concepts review: plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int 29: 358, 2008.

  • 4.

    Mendes A: An overview of plantar fasciitis. Br J Community Nurs 21: 160, 2016.

  • 5.

    Belatti DA, Phisitkul P: Economic burden of foot and ankle surgery in the US Medicare population. Foot Ankle Int 35: 334, 2014.

  • 6.

    Plantar fasciitis: will physical therapy help my foot pain? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 47: 56, 2017.

  • 7.

    Hasegawa M, Urits I, Orhurhu V, et al: Current concepts of minimally invasive treatment options for plantar fasciitis: a comprehensive review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 24: 55, 2020.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Ogden JA, Alvarez R, Levitt R, et al: Shock wave therapy for chronic proximal plantar fasciitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 387: 47, 2001.

  • 9.

    Hsu WH, Lai LJ, Chang HY, et al: Effect of shockwave therapy on plantar fasciopathy: a biomechanical prospective. Bone Joint J 95-B: 1088, 2013.

  • 10.

    Aparecida Da Silva A, Leal-Junior ECP, Alves ACA, et al: Wound-healing effects of low-level laser therapy in diabetic rats involve the modulation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 and the redistribution of collagen types I and III. J Cosmet Laser Ther 15: 210, 2013.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    da Rosa AS, dos Santos AF, da Silva MM, et al: Effects of low‐level laser therapy at wavelengths of 660 and 808 nm in experimental model of osteoarthritis. Photochem Photobiol 88: 161, 2012.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Dizon JNC, Gonzalez-Suarez C, Zamora MTG, et al: Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in chronic plantar fasciitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 92: 606, 2013.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Yin M-C, Ye J, Yao M, et al: Is extracorporeal shock wave therapy clinical efficacy for relief of chronic, recalcitrant plantar fasciitis? a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo or active-treatment controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95: 1585, 2014.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Li S, Wang K, Sun H, et al: Clinical effects of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and ultrasound-guided local corticosteroid injections for plantar fasciitis in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 97: e13687, 2018.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Aqil A, Siddiqui MR, Solan M, et al: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is effective in treating chronic plantar fasciitis: a meta-analysis of RCTs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471: 3645, 2013.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Roerdink RL, Dietvorst M, van der Zwaard B, et al: Complications of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in plantar fasciitis: systematic review. Int J Surg 46: 133, 2017.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Wang W, Jiang W, Tang C, et al: Clinical efficacy of low-level laser therapy in plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 98: e14088, 2019.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Cotler HB, Chow RT, Hamblin MR, et al: The use of low level laser therapy (LLLT) for musculoskeletal pain. MOJ Orthop Rheumatol 2: 00068, 2015.

  • 19.

    Çinar E, Saxena S, Uygur F: Combination therapy versus exercise and orthotic support in the management of pain in plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. Foot Ankle Int 39: 406, 2018.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Mazza J, et al: A review of the foot function index and the foot function index–revised. J Foot Ankle Res 6: 1, 2013.

  • 21.

    Venditto T, Tognolo L, Rizzo RS, et al: 17-Italian Foot Function Index with numerical rating scale: development, reliability, and validity of a modified version of the original Foot Function Index. The Foot 25: 12, 2015.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, et al: Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain 8: 283, 2004.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Huffer D, Hing W, Newton R, et al: Strength training for plantar fasciitis and the intrinsic foot musculature: a systematic review. Phys Ther Sport 24: 44, 2017.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, et al: G* Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39: 175, 2007.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Wang Y-C, Chen S-J, Huang P-J, et al: Efficacy of different energy levels used in focused and radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of plantar fasciitis: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. J Clin Med 8: 1497, 2019.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Martin RL, Davenport TE, Reischl SF, et al: Heel pain—plantar fasciitis: revision 2014. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 44: A1, 2014.

  • 27.

    Morrissey D, Cotchett M, J'Bari AS, et al: Management of plantar heel pain: a best practice guide informed by a systematic review, expert clinical reasoning and patient values. Br J Sports Med 55: 1106, 2021.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Jastifer JR, Catena F, Doty JF, et al: Low-level laser therapy for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int 35: 566, 2014.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Kiritsi O, Tsitas K, Malliaropoulos N, et al: Ultrasonographic evaluation of plantar fasciitis after low-level laser therapy: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci 25: 275, 2010.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Li X, Zhang L, Gu S, et al: Comparative effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave, ultrasound, low-level laser therapy, noninvasive interactive neurostimulation, and pulsed radiofrequency treatment for treating plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine 97: e12819, 2018.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Macias DM, Coughlin MJ, Zang K, et al: Low-level laser therapy at 635 nm for treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a placebo-controlled, randomized study. J Foot Ankle Surg 54: 768, 2015.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Hyland MR, Webber-Gaffney A, Cohen L, et al: Randomized controlled trial of calcaneal taping, sham taping, and plantar fascia stretching for the short-term management of plantar heel pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36: 364, 2006.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Speed C, Nichols D, Wies J, et al: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis. a double blind randomised controlled trial. J Orthop Res 21: 937, 2003.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Gerdesmeyer L, Frey C, Vester J, et al: Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis: results of a confirmatory randomized placebo-controlled multicenter study. Am J Sports Med 36: 2100, 2008.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Ibrahim MI, Donatelli RA, Schmitz C, et al: Chronic plantar fasciitis treated with two sessions of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy. Foot Ankle Int 31: 391, 2010.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Theodore GH, Buch M, Amendola A, et al: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int 25: 290, 2004.

  • 37.

    Ulusoy A, Cerrahoglu L, Orguc S: Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes of laser therapy, ultrasound therapy, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy for treatment of plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Foot Ankle Surg 56: 762, 2017.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Sanmak ÖDY, Külcü DG, Mesci N, et al: Comparison of effects of low-level laser therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a randomized, prospective, single-blind clinical study. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil 65: 184, 2018.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    ELsehrawy G, Nasef S, Ibrahim M, et al: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus low-level laser therapy in the management of chronic plantar fasciitis. Suez Canal Univ Med J 21: 71, 2018.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy versus Low-Level Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Eren Timurtaş Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Health Science Faculty, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Eren Timurtaş in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PT, PhD
,
Eda Çinar Département de Psychoéducation, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.

Search for other papers by Eda Çinar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PT, MSc
,
Halit Selçuk Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Health Science Faculty, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Halit Selçuk in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PT, MSc
,
Ender Ersin Avci Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Health Science Faculty, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Ender Ersin Avci in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PT, MSc
,
Suat Batar Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Suat Batar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
İlkşan Demirbüken Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Health Science Faculty, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Search for other papers by İlkşan Demirbüken in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PT, PhD
, and
Mine Gülden Polat Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Health Science Faculty, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Mine Gülden Polat in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PT, PhD

Background: Plantar fasciitis is predominantly treated conservatively through modalities such as extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT), yet the short-term effect of these modalities on pain and function is still ambiguous. We compared the short-term effectiveness of ESWT and LLLT on pain and function in patients with plantar fasciitis.

Methods: Participants (n = 47) were randomly assigned to the ESWT group (n = 27) or the LLLT group (n = 20). Participants received ESWT (once a week) and LLLT (three times a week) for 3 weeks. The Foot Function Index, including the pain, disability, and activity limitation subscales, was administered at baseline and after treatment. A reduction of 1 point in total scores was considered a minimum clinically important difference. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to analyze the changes in outcomes and compare groups.

Results: There were significant main effects of time, and significant interaction effects between group and time on pain (P < .001), disability (P < .001), and activity limitation (P < .05). The main effect of group was not significant for all of the subscales (P = .811, P = .481, P = .865, respectively). The LLLT group showed significant declines in pain (P < .001), disability (P < .001), and activity limitation (P < .001), and there was no change in the ESWT group over time (P = .319, P = .711, P > .99, respectively). Consistently, 95% of participants in the LLLT group had a clinically important difference in the pain subscale versus 48% of the ESWT group.

Conclusions: Compared with ESWT, LLLT was found to be superior as an effective approach in the short-term management of plantar fasciitis.

Corresponding author: Eren Timurtaş, PT, PhD, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Health Science Faculty, Marmara University, Başıbüyük Cd. No:9, 34854 Maltepe/İstanbul/Turkey. (E-mail: fzteren@gmail.com)
Save