Cutts S, Obi N, Pasapula C, et al: Plantar fasciitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94: 539, 2012.
Goff JD, Crawford R: Diagnosis and treatment of plantar fasciitis. Am Fam Physician 84: 676, 2011.
League AC: Current concepts review: plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int 29: 358, 2008.
Mendes A: An overview of plantar fasciitis. Br J Community Nurs 21: 160, 2016.
Belatti DA, Phisitkul P: Economic burden of foot and ankle surgery in the US Medicare population. Foot Ankle Int 35: 334, 2014.
Plantar fasciitis: will physical therapy help my foot pain? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 47: 56, 2017.
Hasegawa M, Urits I, Orhurhu V, et al: Current concepts of minimally invasive treatment options for plantar fasciitis: a comprehensive review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 24: 55, 2020.
Ogden JA, Alvarez R, Levitt R, et al: Shock wave therapy for chronic proximal plantar fasciitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 387: 47, 2001.
Hsu WH, Lai LJ, Chang HY, et al: Effect of shockwave therapy on plantar fasciopathy: a biomechanical prospective. Bone Joint J 95-B: 1088, 2013.
Aparecida Da Silva A, Leal-Junior ECP, Alves ACA, et al: Wound-healing effects of low-level laser therapy in diabetic rats involve the modulation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 and the redistribution of collagen types I and III. J Cosmet Laser Ther 15: 210, 2013.
da Rosa AS, dos Santos AF, da Silva MM, et al: Effects of low‐level laser therapy at wavelengths of 660 and 808 nm in experimental model of osteoarthritis. Photochem Photobiol 88: 161, 2012.
Dizon JNC, Gonzalez-Suarez C, Zamora MTG, et al: Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in chronic plantar fasciitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 92: 606, 2013.
Yin M-C, Ye J, Yao M, et al: Is extracorporeal shock wave therapy clinical efficacy for relief of chronic, recalcitrant plantar fasciitis? a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo or active-treatment controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95: 1585, 2014.
Li S, Wang K, Sun H, et al: Clinical effects of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and ultrasound-guided local corticosteroid injections for plantar fasciitis in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 97: e13687, 2018.
Aqil A, Siddiqui MR, Solan M, et al: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is effective in treating chronic plantar fasciitis: a meta-analysis of RCTs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471: 3645, 2013.
Roerdink RL, Dietvorst M, van der Zwaard B, et al: Complications of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in plantar fasciitis: systematic review. Int J Surg 46: 133, 2017.
Wang W, Jiang W, Tang C, et al: Clinical efficacy of low-level laser therapy in plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 98: e14088, 2019.
Cotler HB, Chow RT, Hamblin MR, et al: The use of low level laser therapy (LLLT) for musculoskeletal pain. MOJ Orthop Rheumatol 2: 00068, 2015.
Çinar E, Saxena S, Uygur F: Combination therapy versus exercise and orthotic support in the management of pain in plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. Foot Ankle Int 39: 406, 2018.
Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Mazza J, et al: A review of the foot function index and the foot function index–revised. J Foot Ankle Res 6: 1, 2013.
Venditto T, Tognolo L, Rizzo RS, et al: 17-Italian Foot Function Index with numerical rating scale: development, reliability, and validity of a modified version of the original Foot Function Index. The Foot 25: 12, 2015.
Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, et al: Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain 8: 283, 2004.
Huffer D, Hing W, Newton R, et al: Strength training for plantar fasciitis and the intrinsic foot musculature: a systematic review. Phys Ther Sport 24: 44, 2017.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, et al: G* Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39: 175, 2007.
Wang Y-C, Chen S-J, Huang P-J, et al: Efficacy of different energy levels used in focused and radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of plantar fasciitis: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. J Clin Med 8: 1497, 2019.
Martin RL, Davenport TE, Reischl SF, et al: Heel pain—plantar fasciitis: revision 2014. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 44: A1, 2014.
Morrissey D, Cotchett M, J'Bari AS, et al: Management of plantar heel pain: a best practice guide informed by a systematic review, expert clinical reasoning and patient values. Br J Sports Med 55: 1106, 2021.
Jastifer JR, Catena F, Doty JF, et al: Low-level laser therapy for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int 35: 566, 2014.
Kiritsi O, Tsitas K, Malliaropoulos N, et al: Ultrasonographic evaluation of plantar fasciitis after low-level laser therapy: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci 25: 275, 2010.
Li X, Zhang L, Gu S, et al: Comparative effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave, ultrasound, low-level laser therapy, noninvasive interactive neurostimulation, and pulsed radiofrequency treatment for treating plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine 97: e12819, 2018.
Macias DM, Coughlin MJ, Zang K, et al: Low-level laser therapy at 635 nm for treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a placebo-controlled, randomized study. J Foot Ankle Surg 54: 768, 2015.
Hyland MR, Webber-Gaffney A, Cohen L, et al: Randomized controlled trial of calcaneal taping, sham taping, and plantar fascia stretching for the short-term management of plantar heel pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36: 364, 2006.
Speed C, Nichols D, Wies J, et al: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis. a double blind randomised controlled trial. J Orthop Res 21: 937, 2003.
Gerdesmeyer L, Frey C, Vester J, et al: Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis: results of a confirmatory randomized placebo-controlled multicenter study. Am J Sports Med 36: 2100, 2008.
Ibrahim MI, Donatelli RA, Schmitz C, et al: Chronic plantar fasciitis treated with two sessions of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy. Foot Ankle Int 31: 391, 2010.
Theodore GH, Buch M, Amendola A, et al: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int 25: 290, 2004.
Ulusoy A, Cerrahoglu L, Orguc S: Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes of laser therapy, ultrasound therapy, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy for treatment of plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Foot Ankle Surg 56: 762, 2017.
Sanmak ÖDY, Külcü DG, Mesci N, et al: Comparison of effects of low-level laser therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a randomized, prospective, single-blind clinical study. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil 65: 184, 2018.
ELsehrawy G, Nasef S, Ibrahim M, et al: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus low-level laser therapy in the management of chronic plantar fasciitis. Suez Canal Univ Med J 21: 71, 2018.
Background: Plantar fasciitis is predominantly treated conservatively through modalities such as extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT), yet the short-term effect of these modalities on pain and function is still ambiguous. We compared the short-term effectiveness of ESWT and LLLT on pain and function in patients with plantar fasciitis.
Methods: Participants (n = 47) were randomly assigned to the ESWT group (n = 27) or the LLLT group (n = 20). Participants received ESWT (once a week) and LLLT (three times a week) for 3 weeks. The Foot Function Index, including the pain, disability, and activity limitation subscales, was administered at baseline and after treatment. A reduction of 1 point in total scores was considered a minimum clinically important difference. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to analyze the changes in outcomes and compare groups.
Results: There were significant main effects of time, and significant interaction effects between group and time on pain (P < .001), disability (P < .001), and activity limitation (P < .05). The main effect of group was not significant for all of the subscales (P = .811, P = .481, P = .865, respectively). The LLLT group showed significant declines in pain (P < .001), disability (P < .001), and activity limitation (P < .001), and there was no change in the ESWT group over time (P = .319, P = .711, P > .99, respectively). Consistently, 95% of participants in the LLLT group had a clinically important difference in the pain subscale versus 48% of the ESWT group.
Conclusions: Compared with ESWT, LLLT was found to be superior as an effective approach in the short-term management of plantar fasciitis.