Vetter SY, Palesche N, Beisemann N, et al: Influence of syndesmotic injuries and posterior malleolar ankle fractures on fibula position in the ankle joint: a cadaveric study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 47: 905, 2021.
Liu J, Valentine D, Ebraheim NA: Management of syndesmosis injury: a narrative review. Orthop Res Rev 14: 471, 2022.
Tonogai I, Hamada D, Sairyo K: Morphology of the incisura fibularis at the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in the Japanese population. J Foot Ankle Surg 56: 1147, 2017.
Lindsjö U: Operative treatment of ankle fractures. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 189: 1, 1981.
Stiene A, Renner CE, Chen T, et al: Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis dysfunction: a systematic literature review of dynamic versus static fixation over the last 10 years. J Foot Ankle Surg 58: 320, 2019.
Sagi HC, Shah AR, Sanders RW: The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 26: 439, 2012.
Chissell HR, Jones J: The influence of a diastasis screw on the outcome of Weber type-C ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77: 435, 1995.
van den Bekerom MP, de Leeuw PA, van Dijk CN: Delayed operative treatment of syndesmotic instability: current concepts review. Injury 40: 1137, 2009.
McKinley TO, Rudert MJ, Tochigi Y, et al: Incongruity-dependent changes of contact stress rates in human cadaveric ankles. J Orthop Trauma 20: 732, 2006.
Tochigi Y, Rudert MJ, McKinley TO, et al: Correlation of dynamic cartilage contact stress aberrations with severity of instability in ankle incongruity. J Orthop Res 26: 1186, 2008.
Pettrone FA, Gail M, Pee D, et al: Quantitative criteria for prediction of the results after displaced fracture of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65: 667, 1983.
Ostrum RF, De Meo P, Subramanian R: A critical analysis of the anterior-posterior radiographic anatomy of the ankle syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 16: 128, 1995.
Brage ME, Bennett CR, Whitehurst JB, et al: Observer reliability in ankle radiographic measurements. Foot Ankle Int 18: 324, 1997.
Saldua NS, Harris JF, LeClere LE, et al: Plantar flexion influences radiographic measurements of the ankle mortise. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92: 911, 2010.
Beumer A, Swierstra BA: The influence of ankle positioning on the radiography of the distal tibial tubercles. Surg Radiol Anat 25: 446, 2003.
Batıbay SG, Bayram S, Polat Ö: Bone morphology as a determinative risk factor for type of ankle fracture. JAPMA 113: 20, 2023.
Taşer F, Toker S, Kilinçoğlu V: Evaluation of morphometric characteristics of the fibular incisura on dry bones. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 20: 52, 2009.
Mavi A, Yildirim H, Gunes H, et al: The fibular incisura of the tibia with recurrent sprained ankle on magnetic resonance imaging. Saudi Med J 23: 845, 2002.
Sharif B, Welck M, Saifuddin A: MRI of the distal tibiofibular joint. Skeletal Radiol 49: 1, 2020.
Yildirim H, Mavi A, Büyükbebeci O, et al: Evaluation of the fibular incisura of the tibia with magnetic resonance imaging. Foot Ankle Int 24: 387, 2003.
Dikos GD, Heisler J, Choplin RH, et al: Normal tibiofibular relationships at the syndesmosis on axial CT imaging. J Orthop Trauma 26: 433, 2012.
Park CH, Kim GB: Tibiofibular relationships of the normal syndesmosis differ by age on axial computed tomography-anterior fibular translation with age. Injury 50: 1256, 2019.
Burns WC II, Prakash K, Adelaar R, et al: Tibiotalar joint dynamics: indications for the syndesmotic screw: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle 14: 153, 1993.
Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Yang H, et al: Radiographic and CT evaluation of tibiofibular syndesmotic diastasis: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int 18: 693, 1997.
McKinley TO, Tochigi Y, Rudert MJ, et al: Instability-associated changes in contact stress and contact stress rates near a step-off incongruity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90: 375, 2008.
Pneumaticos SG, Noble PC, Chatziioannou SN, et al: The effects of rotation on radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 23: 107, 2002.
Chan KB, Lui TH: Isolated anterior syndesmosis diastasis without fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127: 321, 2007.
Magid D, Michelson JD, Ney DR, et al: Adult ankle fractures: comparison of plain films and interactive two- and three-dimensional CT scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154: 1017, 1990.
Procter P, Paul JP: Ankle joint biomechanics. J Biomech 15: 627, 1982.
Objective: Computed tomography (CT) is superior to plain radiography for evaluating ankle syndesmosis, but anatomical variations can affect the measurements. This study aimed to assess the radiologic parameters of the incisura fibularis and the factors that could affect these parameters.
Materials and Methods: Lower-extremity CT angiography images were used to evaluate the morphology of the incisura fibularis, anterior and posterior tibiofibular distance, longitudinal and transverse length of the distal fibula, length and depth of the incisura fibularis notch, tibiofibular clear space, tibiofibular overlap, and fibular rotation. Each measured parameter was compared based on sex and body side. Also, the effect of age, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) on parameters was evaluated.
Results: A total of 123 patients (83 men and 40 women) were included, and 246 ankles were measured. The CT measurements demonstrated excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability. No statistically significant sex or side differences were found in tibiofibular overlap (TFO) and tibiofibular clear space, the most-used parameters in radiographs. Age, weight, and BMI were found to be correlated with TFO.
Conclusions: The present study provides CT measurements of the normal tibiofibular syndesmosis in the Turkish population. Also, the correlations of the parameters with age, height, weight, and BMI are presented. Therefore, TFO and tibiofibular clear space of the uninjured side can be used to plan the treatment of ankle injuries.