• 1.

    Lee K, Kim K, Park Y, et al: Midterm outcome of modified Kidner procedure. Foot Ankle Int 33: 122, 2012.

  • 2.

    Chow Liang Z, Lui T: Endoscopically assisted reconstruction of posterior tibial tendon for stage 2 posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Arthrosc Tech 8: e237, 2019.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Lui T: Endoscopic assisted posterior tibial tendon reconstruction for stage 2 posterior tibial tendon insufficiency. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 15: 1228, 2007.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Dominick D, Catanzariti A: Posterior tibial tendon allograft reconstruction for stage II adult acquired flatfoot: a case series. J Foot Ankle Surg 59: 821, 2020.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Murray M, Guten G, Baldwin J, et al: A comparison of plantar flexion torque with and without the triceps surae. Acta Orthop Scand 47: 122, 1976.

  • 6.

    Silver R, de la Garza J, Rang M: The myth of muscle balance. A study of relative strengths and excursions of normal muscles about the foot and ankle. J Bone Jt Surg Br 67: 432, 1985.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Hui H, Beals T, Brown N: Influence of tendon transfer site on moment arms of the flexor digitorum longus muscle. Foot Ankle Int 28: 441, 2007.

  • 8.

    Kelly M, Casscells N: Tendon transfer versus allograft reconstruction in progressive collapsing foot deformity. Foot Ankle Clin 26: 465, 2021.

  • 9.

    Oji D: “Sesamoids and Accessory Bones of the Foot,” in Coughlin and Mann’s Surgery of the Foot and Ankle, 10th Ed, p. 469, Elsevier, Philadelphia, 2023.

  • 10.

    Wang S, Zhang C, Cai Y, et al: Autograft or allograft? Irradiated or not? A contrast between autograft and allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Arthroscopy 34: 3258, 2018.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Kan S, Yuan Z, Ning G, et al: Autograft versus allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Med 95: e4936, 2016.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Maffulli N, D’Addona A, Gougoulias N, et al: Ipsilateral free semitendinosus graft with interference screw fixation for surgical management of insertional acute Achilles tendon tears. Injury 51: S73, 2020.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Harris J, Fazalare J, Phieffer L, et al: Patellar tendon reconstruction with semitendinosus-gracilis autograft. J Knee Surg 26: S19, 2013.

  • 14.

    Moretti L, Vicenti G, Abate A, et al: Patellar tendon rerupture in a footballer: our personal surgical technique and review of the literature. Injury 45: 452, 2014.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Treatment of a Damaged Posterior Tibialis Tendon Through Reconstruction Using a Hamstring Autograft

A Case Report

Mustafa Alper Incesoy Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology Bezmialem Vakif University, Instanbul, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Mustafa Alper Incesoy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
and
Gokcer Uzer Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology Bezmialem Vakif University, Instanbul, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Gokcer Uzer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD

This case report presents the unique clinical history of a 26-year-old male patient who experienced a posterior tibial tendon (PTT) rupture following the Kidner procedure for a symptomatic accessory navicular bone. The subsequent reconstruction utilized a hamstring autograft. The patient, unresponsive to conservative treatments, underwent the Kidner procedure, resulting in PTT rupture at the eleventh postoperative week. Surgical intervention involved hamstring autograft retrieval, creating a bone tunnel in the navicular, and securing the autograft to the proximal PTT stump along with an Evans procedure. The case contributes to the discourse on PTT reconstruction methods, emphasizing the distinctive choice of autograft, specifically the hamstring, and its efficacy. At the 28-month follow-up, the patient did not complain of any residual pain and he was able to perform normal daily activities without any limitations. This case sheds light on PTT complications after the Kidner procedure, and emphasizes the role of autograft reconstruction, while contributing to the ongoing discussions about optimal strategies.

Corresponding author: Mustafa Alper Incesoy, MD, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology Bezmialem Vakif University Adnan Menderes Blv. Topkapi District. No:113 Fatih Istanbul, 34000 Turkey. (E-mail: alperincesoy@gmail.com)
Save