• 1

    Root ML: Development of the functional foot orthosis. .Clin Podiatr Med Surg 11::183. ,1994. .

  • 2

    Hice GA: Orthotic treatment of feet having a high oblique midtarsal joint axis. .JAPA 74::577. ,1984. .

  • 3

    Darrigan RD, Ganley JV: Functional orthoses with intrinsic rearfoot post. .JAPMA 75::619. ,1985. .

  • 4

    Blake RL: Inverted functional orthosis. .JAPMA 76::275. ,1986. .

  • 5

    Blake RL, Ferguson H: Foot orthosis for the severe flatfoot in sports. .JAPMA 81::549. ,1991. .

  • 6

    Blake RL, Ferguson H: The inverted orthotic technique: a practical discussion of an orthotic therapy. .J Br Podiatr Med 48::25. ,1993. .

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Ferguson H, Blake RL: Update and rationale for the inverted functional foot orthosis. .Clin Podiatr Med Surg 11::311. ,1994. .

  • 8

    Blake RL, Ferguson H: “The Inverted Orthotic Technique: Its Role in Clinical Biomechanics,” in Clinical Biomechanics of the Lower Extremities, ed by RL Valmassy, p 465, Mosby, St Louis, 1996..

  • 9

    Kirby KA: The medial heel skive technique: improving pronation control in foot orthoses. .JAPMA 82::177. ,1992. .

  • 10

    Gardner C, Coull D, Coull R: DC Inverted Wedge Technique. Available at: http://www.equusmedical.com/DC_Inverted/dcinver.htm. Accessed October 28, 2000..

  • 11

    Lundeen RO: Polysectional triaxial posting: a new process for incorporating correction in foot orthoses. .JAPMA 78::55. ,1988. .

  • 12

    Anthony RJ: Positive cast sectioning: an essential prescription writing protocol. .J Br Podiatr Med 50::11. ,1995. .

  • 13

    Dananberg HJ: Gait style as an etiology to chronic postural pain: part I. Functional hallux limitus. .JAPMA 83::433. ,1993. .

  • 14

    Dananberg HJ: Gait style as an etiology to chronic postural pain: part II. Postural compensatory process. .JAPMA 83::615. ,1993. .

  • 15

    Olson WR: Orthoses: an analysis of their component materials. .JAPMA 78::203. ,1988. .

  • 16

    Kippen C: A review of plastic materials used in foot orthotic manufacture. .Chiropodist 44::90. ,1989. .

  • 17

    Kippen C: Insoling materials in foot orthosis manufacture: a review. .Chiropodist 44::83. ,1989. .

  • 18

    Rome K: Behavior of orthotic materials in chiropody. .JAPMA 80::471. ,1990. .

  • 19

    Rome K: A study of the properties of materials used in podiatry. .JAPMA 81::73. ,1991. .

  • 20

    Berenter RW, Kosai DK: Various types of orthoses used in podiatry. .Clin Podiatr Med Surg 11::219. ,1994. .

  • 21

    Olsen WR: “Orthotic Materials,” in Clinical Biomechanics of the Lower Extremities, ed by RL Valmassy, p 307, Mosby, St Louis, 1996..

  • 22

    Goslin R, Tollafield DR, Rome K: “Mechanical Therapeutics in the Clinic,” in Clinical Skills in Treating the Foot, ed by DR Tollafield, p 187, LM Merriman, Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1997..

  • 23

    Petchell A, Keenan A-M, Landorf K: National clinical guidelines for podiatric foot orthoses. .Australas J Podiatr Med 32::97. ,1998. .

  • 24

    Australian Podiatry Council: Clinical Guidelines for Orthotic Therapy Provided by Podiatrists. Collingwood, Victoria: Australian Podiatry Council, 1998..

  • 25

    Anthony RJ: The Manufacture and Use of the Functional Foot Orthosis, p 49, Karger, Basel, Switzerland, 1991..

  • 26

    Philps JW: The Functional Foot Orthosis, pp 39, 71, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1995..

  • 27

    Root ML, Weed JH, Orien WP: Neutral Position Casting Techniques, p 6, Clinical Biomechanics Corporation, Los Angeles, 1971..

  • 28

    Langer S, Wernick J: A Practical Manual for a Basic Approach to Foot Biomechanics, p 28, Langer Biomechanics Group (UK) Ltd, England, 1989..

  • 29

    Portney LG, Watkins MP: Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, p 497, Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT, 1993..

  • 30

    Carr J, Shepherd R: Clinical physiotherapy specialisation in Australia: some current views. .Aust Physio 42::10. ,1996. .

  • 31

    Hunt A, Adamson B, Harris L: Physiotherapists’ perception of the gap between education and practice. .Physio Theory Practice 14::125. ,1998. .

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Harris L, Hunt B, Adamson J, et al: Assessing quality in higher education: criteria for evaluating programmes for allied health professionals. .Assess Eval Higher Education 23::273. ,1998. .

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Kippen C, Tinley P: Australian National Survey on Continuing Professional Education: A Gender Report. Presented at Australasian Podiatry Conference; August 13, 1999; Methven, NZ..

  • 34

    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Podiatry labour force 1992. .Health and Labour Force Bulletin 2::1. ,1994. .

  • 35

    Torode IP: Postural abnormalities in childhood. .Mod Med (June)::74. ,1996. .

Foot Orthosis Prescription Habits of Australian and New Zealand Podiatric Physicians

Karl Landorf DipAppSc(Pod), GradDipEd1, Anne-Maree Keenan BAppSc(Pod), MAppSc2, and R. Louise Rushworth MBBS, PhD3
View More View Less
  • 1 Lecturer, School of Exercise and Health Sciences, Campbelltown Campus, Bld 24, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith DC, New South Wales 1797, Australia.
  • | 2 Senior Lecturer, School of Exercise and Health Sciences, Campbelltown Campus, University of Western Sydney.
  • | 3 Fellow, Australian Faculty of Public Health Medicine; Senior Lecturer, College of Social and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney.
Restricted access

This research project investigated the orthotic prescription habits of podiatric physicians in Australia and New Zealand. A 23-item questionnaire was distributed to all members of the Australian Podiatry Association and the New Zealand Society of Podiatrists. When asked what type of foot orthoses they prescribe most often, 72% of respondents reported functional foot orthoses; the next most common response was prefabricated orthoses (12%). A typical prescription for functional foot orthoses consisted of a modified Root style orthosis, balanced to the neutral calcaneal stance position, with the shell made from polypropylene and an ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA) rearfoot post applied. The majority of podiatric physicians surveyed used a commercial orthotic laboratory to fabricate their orthoses. However, New Zealand respondents were three times more likely to prescribe prefabricated foot orthoses, and males were twice as likely as females to manufacture the orthoses themselves rather than use a commercial orthotic laboratory. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 91(4): 174-183, 2001)