advertising
-
1
Ryan JB, Hopkinson WJ, Wheeler JH, et al: Office management of the acute ankle sprain. .Clin Sports Med 8::477. ,1989. .
-
2
Macdonald R: Taping Techniques: Principles and Practice, Oxford, England, 1994..
-
3
Norris CM: Taping: components, application and mechanism. .Sports Exerc Inj 1::14. ,1994. .
-
4
Libera D: Ankle taping, wrapping and injury prevention. .J Athlet Train 7::73. ,1972. .
-
5
Quinn K, Parker P, Bie RD, et al: Interventions for preventing ankle ligament injuries. .The Cochrane Library 1.,2001. .
-
6
Thacker SB, Stroup SF, Branche CM, et al: The prevention of ankle sprains in sports: a systematic review of the literature. .Am J Sports Med 27::753. ,1999. .
-
8
Artor R, Gunn K, McPoil T, et al: The effect of adhesive strapping on medial longitudinal arch support before and after exercise. .J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 14::18. ,1991. .
-
9
Vincenzino B, Feilding J, Howard R, et al: An investigation of the anti-pronation effect of two taping methods after application and exercise. .Gait Posture 5::1. ,1997. .
-
10
Greene TA, Hillman SK: Comparison of support provided by a semirigid orthosis and ankle taping before, during, and after exercise. .Am J Sports Med 18::498. ,1990. .
-
11
Bunch RP, Bedarsjki K, Macinanti R: Ankle joint support: a comparison of reusable lace-on braces with taping and wrapping. .Physician Sports Med 13::59. ,1985. .
-
12
Gross MT, Bradshaw MK, Ventry LC, et al: Comparison of support provided by ankle taping and semi-rigid orthosis. .J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 9::33. ,1987. .
-
13
Shapiro MS, Kabo JM, Mitchell PW, et al: Ankle sprain prophylaxis: an analysis of the stabilizing effects of braces and tape. .Am J Sports Med 22::78. ,1994. .
-
14
Anderson DL, Sanderson DJ, Hennig EM: The role of external nonrigid ankle bracing in limiting ankle inversion. .Clin J Sports Med 5::18. ,1995. .
-
15
Bennell KL, Goldie PA: The differential effects of external ankle support on postural control. .J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 20::287. ,1994. .
-
16
Robbins S, Waked E, Rappel R: Ankle taping improves proprioception before and after exercise in young men. .Br J Sports Med 29::242. ,1995. .
-
17
Lentell G, Baas B, Lopez D, et al: The contributions of proprioceptive deficits, muscle function and anatomic laxity to functional instability of the ankle. .J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 21::206. ,1995. .
-
18
Michelson JD, Hutchins C: Mechanoreceptors in the human ankle. .J Bone Joint Surg Br 77::219. ,1995. .
-
19
Nawoczenski DA, Owen MG, Ecker ML, et al: Objective evaluation of peroneal response to sudden inversion stress. .J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 7::107. ,1985. .
-
20
Lynch SA, Eklund U, Gottlieb D, et al: Electromyographic latency changes in the ankle musculature during inversion moments. .Am J Sports Med 24::362. ,1996. .
-
21
Ebig M, Lephart SM, Burdett RG, et al: The effect of sudden inversion stress on EMG activity of the peroneal and tibialis anterior muscles in the chronically unstable ankle. .J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 26::73. ,1997. .
-
22
Ashton-Miller JA, Ottaviani RA, Hutchinson C, et al: What protects the inverted weight-bearing ankle against further inversion. ?Am J Sports Med 24::800. ,1996. .
-
23
Bartold S: Conservative management of plantar fasciitis. .Aust Podiatrist 27::46. ,1993.
-
24
Lynch DM, Goforth WP, Martin JE, et al: Conservative management of plantar fasciitis: a prospective study. .JAPMA 88::375. ,1998. .
-
25
Pfeffer G, Bacchetti P, Deland J, et al: Comparison of custom and prefabricated orthoses in the initial treatment of proximal plantar fasciitis. .Foot Ankle Int 20::214. ,1999. .
-
26
Singh D, Angel J, Bentley G, et al: Fortnightly review: plantar fasciitis. .BMJ 315::172. ,1997. .
-
27
Landorf KB: Tibialis posterior dysfunction: early diagnosis is the key. .Aust Podiatrist 29::9. ,1995. .
-
28
Moss CL: Taping for excessive pronation: reverse 8-stirrup. .J Athlet Train 27::85. ,1992. .
-
29
Laughman RK, Carr TA, Chao EY, et al: Three-dimensional kinematics of the taped ankle before and after exercise. .Am J Sports Med 8::425. ,1980. .
-
30
Pope MH: Commentary: three-dimensional kinematics of the taped ankle before and after exercise. .Am J Sports Med 8::431. ,1980. .
-
31
Maslen BA, Ackland TR: Radiographic study of skin displacement errors in the foot and ankle during standing. .Clin Biomech 9::291. ,1994. .
-
32
Marks R, Karkouti E: Evaluation of the reliability of reflective marker placement. .Physiother Res Int 1::50. ,1996. .
-
33
Elveru RA, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL, et al: Methods for taking subtalar joint measurements: a clinical report. .Phys Ther 68::678. ,1988. .
-
34
Cornwall M, McPoil T: Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional rearfoot motion during walking. .Clin Biomech 10::36. ,1995. .
-
35
Cappozzo A, Catani F, Leardini A, et al: Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. .Clin Biomech 11::90. ,1996. .
-
36
Holden JP, Orsini JA, Siegal KL, et al: Surface movement errors in shank kinematics and knee kinetics during gait. .Gait Posture 6::98. ,1997. .
-
37
Reinschmidt C, Lundberg A, Nigg BM, et al: Tibiocalcaneal motion during running, measured with external and bone markers. .Clin Biomech 12::8. ,1997. .
-
38
Hamill J, Bates BT, Holt KG: Timing of lower extremity joint actions during treadmill running. .Med Sci Sports Exerc 24::807. ,1991. .
-
39
Karlsson D: Kinematic Gait Analysis Using the MacReflex System, Biomechanics Seminars 7, Qualysis, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1993..
-
40
Moseley L, Smith R, Hunt A, et al: Three dimensional kinematics of the rearfoot during the stance phase of walking. .Clin Biomech 11::39. ,1995. .
-
41
Scott SH, Winter DL: Talocrural and talocalcaneal joint kinematics of the rearfoot during the stance phase of walking. .J Biomech 24::734. ,1991. .
-
42
Gauffin H, Areblad M, Tropp H: Three-dimensional analysis of the talocrural and subtalar joints in single limb stance. .Clin Biomech 8::307. ,1993. .
-
43
Phillips RD, Law EA, Ward ED: Functional motion of the medial column of the foot during propulsion. .JAPMA 86::474. ,1997. .
-
44
Scholz JP: Reliability and validity of the WATSMART three-dimensional optoelectric motion analysis system. .Phys Ther 69::679. ,1989. .
-
45
Mueller MJ, Norton BJ: Reliability of kinematic measurements of rearfoot motion. .Phys Ther 72::731. ,1992. .
-
46
Linden DWV, Carlson SJ, Hubbard R: Reproducibility and accuracy of angle measurements obtained under static condition with the Motion Analysis Video System. .Phys Ther 72::300. ,1992. .
-
47
Cornwall M, McPoil T: Reducing two-dimensional and three-dimensional rearfoot motion variability during walking. .JAPMA 83::394. ,1993. .
-
48
Keenan A-M, Bach TM: Video assessment of the rearfoot during walking: a reliability study. .Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77::651. ,1996. .
-
49
Redmond A, Keenan A-M, Landorf KB: Horses for courses: the difference between quantitative and qualitative approaches to research. .Australas J Podiatr Med 34::5. ,2000. .
-
50
Green DR, Whitney AK, Walters P: Subtalar joint motion: a simplified view. .JAPMA 69::83. ,1979. .
-
51
Manfroy P, Ashton-Miller JA, Wojtys EM: The effect of exercise, pre-wrap and athletic tape on the maximal active and passive ankle resistance to ankle inversion. .Am J Sports Med 25::156. ,1997. .
The Effect of High-Dye and Low-Dye Taping on Rearfoot Motion
Search for other papers by Anne-Maree Keenan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Craig M. Tanner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
High-Dye and low-Dye taping are commonly used by clinicians to treat a variety of foot and ankle pathologies, particularly those associated with excessive rearfoot pronation. While the effects of taping on end range of motion have been extensively studied, relatively little is understood about the effect of the two styles of taping on rearfoot motion. Eighteen participants were analyzed in three conditions: 1) barefoot, 2) with high-Dye taping, and 3) with low-Dye taping. Two-dimensional motion of the rearfoot was assessed for each condition. The results indicated maximum inversion was increased with both high-Dye and low-Dye taping as compared with no taping. Only high-Dye taping, however, significantly reduced the maximum eversion of the rearfoot. The results suggest that high-Dye taping is an appropriate taping choice when control of eversion of the rearfoot is desired. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 91(5): 255-261, 2001)
advertising
