• 1

    Bryan JL, Cohran J, Larson EL: Hand washing: a ritual revisited. .Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 7::617. ,1995. .

  • 2

    Larson EL, Hughes CAN, Pyrek JD, et al: Changes in bacterial flora associated with skin damage on hands of health care personnel. .Am J Infect Control 26::513. ,1998. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Wyss M, Elsner P, Wuthrich B, et al: Allergic contact dermatitis from natural latex without contact urticaria. .Contact Dermatitis 28::154. ,1993. .

  • 4

    National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Alert: Preventing Allergic Reaction to Natural Rubber Latex in the Workplace, US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 1977. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/latexalt.html..

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Editors: Study reveals high prevalence of chapped hands. .Hosp Infect Control 16::94. ,1989. .

  • 6

    Maso MJ, Goldberg DJ: Contact dermatoses from disposable glove use: a review. .J Am Acad Dermatol 23::733. ,1990. .

  • 7

    Heese A, van Hintzenstern J, Peters KP, et al: Allergic and irritant reaction to rubber gloves in medical health services: spectrum, diagnostic approach, and therapy. .J Am Acad Dermatol 25::831. ,1991. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Cartwright FF: Lister, the man: Lister centenary conference. .Br J Surg 54::405. ,1967. .

  • 9

    Hobson DW, Woller W, Anderson L, et al: Development and evaluation of a new alcohol-based surgical hand scrub formulation with persistent antimicrobial characteristics and brushless application. .Am J Infect Control 26::507. ,1998. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Larson E, Friedman C, Cohran J, et al: Prevalence and correlates of skin damage on hands of nurses. .Heart Lung 26::1714. ,1997. .

  • 11

    Dyer DL, Gerenraich KB, Wadhams PS: Testing a new alcohol-free hand sanitizer to combat infection. .AORN J 68::239. ,1998. .

Effectiveness of a Nonrinse, Alcohol-Free Antiseptic Hand Wash

Anoosh Moadab Submitted during fourth year, California College of Podiatric Medicine, San Francisco. Mailing address:375 Laguna Honda Blvd, Box 27, San Francisco, CA 94116.

Search for other papers by Anoosh Moadab in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
,
Kathryne F. Rupley Submitted during fourth year, California College of Podiatric Medicine, San Francisco.

Search for other papers by Kathryne F. Rupley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
, and
Peter Wadhams Diplomate, American Board of Podiatric Surgery; Research Coordinator, Woodward Laboratories, Inc, Los Alamitos, CA.

Search for other papers by Peter Wadhams in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DPM

This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel surfactant, allantoin, and benzalkonium chloride hand sanitizer using the US Food and Drug Administration’s method for testing antiseptic hand washes that podiatric physicians and other health-care personnel use. The alcohol-free product, HandClens, was compared with an alcohol-based product, Purell. Independent researchers from the California College of Podiatric Medicine conducted the study using 40 volunteer students from the class of 2001. The results show that HandClens outperformed Purell and met the regulatory requirements for a hand sanitizer. Purell failed as an antimicrobial hand wash and was less effective than a control soap used in the study. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 91(6): 288-293, 2001)

Save