Jahss MH: “Bone Dysplasia,” in Disorders of the Foot and Ankle: Medical and Surgical Management, 2nd Ed, Vol 1, ed by A Norman, A Greenspan, p 760, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1991..
Harris WH, Dudley R, Barry RJ: The natural history of fibrous dysplasia. .J Bone Joint Surg Am 44::207. ,1962. .
Utz JA, Kransdorf MJ, Jelinek JS, et al: MR appearance of fibrous dysplasia. .J Comput Assist Tomogr 13::845. ,1989. .
Bloem JL, van der Hevl RO, Schuttevaer HM, et al: Fibrous dysplasia versus adamantinoma of the tibia: differentiation based on discriminant analysis of clinical and plain film findings. .AJR Am J Roentgenol 156::1017. ,1991. .
Gibson MJ, Middlemiss JH: Fibrous dysplasia of bone. .Br J Radiol 44::1. ,1971. .
Hudson TM: “Benign Fibrous and Fibro-Osseous Lesions,” in Radiological-Pathological Correlation of Musculoskeletal Lesions, ed by TM Hudson, p 321, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1987..
Moser RP: Fibrous lesions of bone. .Radiol Clin North Am 31::285. ,1993. .
Kumar V, Cotran RS, Robbins SL: “The Musculoskeletal System,” in Basic Pathology, ed by V Cumar, R Cotran, S Robbins, p 688, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1992..
Ruggieri P, Sim FH, Bond JR, et al: Malignancies in fibrous dysplasia. .Cancer 73::1411. ,1994. .
Pratt AD, Felson B, Wiot JF, et al: Sequestrum formation in fibrous dysplasia. .AJR Am J Roentgenol 106::162. ,1969. .
Norris MA, Kaplin PA, Palthria M, et al: Fibrous dysplasia: magnetic resonance imaging appearance at 1.5 Tesla. .Clin Imaging 14::211. ,1990. .
Daffner RH, Kirks DR, Gehweiler JA, et al: Computed tomography of fibrous dysplasia. .AJR Am J Roentgenol 139::943. ,1982. .
Dominguez R, Saucedo J, Fenstermacher M: MRI findings in osteofibrous dysplasia. .Magn Reson Imaging 7::567. ,1989. .
Feintuch TA: Chondrosarcoma arising in a cartilaginous area of previously irradiated fibrous dysplasia. .Cancer 31::877. ,1973. .
Machida K, Makita K, Nishikawa J, et al: Scintigraphic manifestation of fibrous dysplasia. .Clin Nucl Med 11::426. ,1986. .
The authors present a case report documenting the evaluation of monostotic fibrous dysplasia by magnetic resonance imaging. This type of evaluation demonstrates specificity for this disease process when combined with other imaging studies, laboratory findings, and clinical presentation. This technique is extremely useful in the identification of a no-touch lesion, allowing avoidance of an unnecessary bone biopsy. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 91(6): 306-310, 2001)