Cho CY, Lo JS: Dressing the part. .Dermatol Clin 16::25. ,1998. .
Turner TD: “The Development of Wound Management Products,” in Chronic Wound Care: A Clinical Source Book for Healthcare Professionals, 2nd Ed, ed by D Krasner, D Kane, p 124, Health Management Publications, Wayne, PA, 1997..
Ovington LG: The well-dressed wound: an overview of dressing types. .Wounds 10 (suppl A)::1A. ,1998. .
Winter GD: Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelialization of superficial wounds in the skin of young domestic pigs. .Nature 193::293. ,1962. .
Hinman CD, Maibach HI: Effect of air exposure and occlusion on experimental human skin wounds. .Nature 200::377. ,1963. .
Bolton LL, Monte K, Pirone LA: Moisture and healing: beyond the jargon. .Ostomy Wound Mgmt 46 (suppl 1A)::51S. ,2000. .
Field CK, Kerstein MD: Overview of wound healing in a moist environment. .Am J Surg 167 (suppl 1A)::2S. ,1994. .
Kannon GA, Garrett AB: Moist wound healing with occlusive dressings. .Dermatol Surg 21::583. ,1995. .
Hutchinson JJ, McGuckin M: Occlusive dressings: a microbiologic and clinical review. .Am J Infect Contr 18::257. ,1990. .
Bolton LL, Johnson CL, van Rijswijk L: Occlusive dressings: therapeutic agents and effects on drug delivery. .Clin Dermatol 9::573. ,1992. .
Mertz PM, Ovington LG: Wound healing microbiology. .Dermatol Clin 11::739. ,1993. .
Rolstad BS, Ovington LG, Harris A: “Principles of Wound Management,” in Acute and Chronic Wounds: Nursing Management, 2nd Ed, ed by RA Bryant, p 85, Mosby, St Louis, 2000..
Wu P, Nelson EA, Reid WH, et al: Water vapour transmission rates in burns and chronic leg ulcers: influence of wound dressings and comparison with in vitro evaluation. .Biomaterials 17::1373. ,1996. .
Silverman RA, Lender J, Elmets CA: Effects of occlusive and semiocclusive dressings on the return of barrier function to transepidermal water loss in standardized human wounds. .J Am Acad Dermatol 20::755. ,1989. .
Bergstrom N, Bennett MA, Carlson CE, et al: Clinical Practice Guideline Number 15: Treatment of Pressure Ulcers. AHCPR publication 95-0652. US Dept of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD, 1994..
Harding KG, Bale S: “Wound care: putting theory into practice in the United Kingdom,” in Chronic Wound Care: A Clinical Source Book for Healthcare Professionals, 2nd Ed, ed by D Krasner, D Kane, p 115, Health Management Publications, Wayne, PA, 1997..
Rodeheaver G: Controversies in topical wound management. .Wounds 1::19. ,1989. .
Owens N: Use of pressure dressings in the treatment of burns and other wounds. .Surg Clin North Am 23::1354. ,1943. .
Colebrook L, Lond MB, Hood AM: Infection through soaked dressings. .Lancet ii::682. ,1948. .
Merkle Leiby D, Lott G: Topical wound product ingredient guide. .Ostomy Wound Mgmt 7::42. ,1997. .
Palamand S, Brenden RA, Reed AM: Intelligent wound dressings and their physical characteristics. .Wounds 3::149. ,1991. .
Wu P, Fisher AC, Foo PP, et al: In vitro assessment of water vapour transmission of synthetic wound dressings. .Biomaterials 16::171. ,1995. .
Smith and Nephew web site. Available at: http://www.snwmd.com/iv/mvtr.htm. Accessed October 10, 2000..
Sasseville D, Tennstedt D, Lachapelle JM: Allergic contact dermatitis from hydrocolloid dressings. .Am J Contact Dermat 8::236. ,1997. .
Falanga V: Venous ulceration. .J Dermatol Surg Oncol 19::764. ,1993. .
Qin Y, Gilding DK: Alginate fibres and wound dressings. .Med Device Technol 7::32. ,1996. .
Lorenzetti OJ, Fortenberry B, Busby E, et al: Influence of microcrystalline collagen on wound healing. .Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 140::896. ,1972. .
Kolenik SA, McGovern TW, Leffell DJ: Use of lyophilized bovine collagen matrix in postoperative wound healing. .Dermatol Surg 25::303. ,1999. .
Purna SK, Babu M: Collagen based dressings: a review. .Burns 26::54. ,2000. .
Silver IA: “Cellular Signalling in Wound Healing,” in Chronic Wound Healing: Clinical Measurement and Basic Science, ed by R Mani, V Falanga, CP Shearman, et al, p 124, WB Saunders, London, 1999..
Ponder RB, Krasner D: Gauzes and related dressings. .Ostomy Wound Mgmt 39::48. ,1993. .
Weir DM, Bohanan BG, Hockenbrocht GP, et al: Improved wound packing and debridement: evaluation of a new fabric sponge. .Wounds 4::216. ,1992. .
Lawrence JC: Dressings and wound infection. .Am J Surg 167 (suppl 1A)::21S. ,1994. .
ConvaTec web site. Available at: http://www.convatec.com. Accessed October 25, 2001..
Edmonds ME, Foster AVM, Wilson S, Doxford M, et al: The management of indolent neuropathic ulceration of the diabetic foot with Hyalofill. Oral abstract presented at the 13th Annual Symposium on Advanced Wound Care, April 3, 2000, 2000; Dallas, TX..
Cook Group web site. Available at: http://www.cooksis.com/technology.html. Accessed October 25, 2001..
Holloway GA, Johansen KH, Barnes RW, et al: Multicenter trial of cadexomer iodine to treat venous stasis ulcer. .West J Med 151::35. ,1989. .
Danielsen L, Cherry GW, Harding K, et al: Cadexomer iodine in ulcers colonised by pseudomonas aeruginosa. .J Wound Care 6::169. ,1997. .
Wright JB, Hansen DL, Burrell RE: The comparative efficacy of two antimicrobial barrier dressings: in vitro examination of two controlled release silver dressings. .Wounds 10::179. ,1998. .
Wright JB, Lam K, Burrell RE: Wound management in an era of increasing bacterial antibiotic resistance: a role for topical silver treatment. .Am J Infect Control 26::572. ,1998. .
Demling RH, DeSanti L: The role of silver in wound healing. .Wounds 13 (suppl A)::4. ,2001. .
Schaum K: Steps to reimbursement success for 2000. Step 3: write orders to justify medical necessity. .Adv Skin Wound Care 13 (4 pt 1)::150. ,2000. .
Advances in Skin and Wound Care: 1999 Directory, Springhouse Corp, Springhouse, PA, 1999 (www.woundcarenet.com)..
Ostomy/Wound Management: 2001 Buyers Guide, Health Management Publications, Malvern, PA, 2001 (www.woundsource.com)..
The Wound Product Sourcebook 2001: Kestrel Health Information, Williston, VT, 2001 (www.woundsource.com)..
The concept of moist wound healing has been examined and gradually accepted by wound care clinicians during the last 40 years, and has led to the development of hundreds of dressings that support a moist wound environment. This article discusses the characteristics of an ideal dressing in an effort to assist clinicians in making appropriate dressing choices from common categories, including transparent films, hydrocolloids, foams, absorptive wound fillers, hydrogels, collagens, and gauzes. Reimbursement issues are also discussed. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 92(1): 24-33, 2002)