• 1

    Manter JT: Movements of the subtalar and transverse tarsal joints. .Anat Rec 80::397. ,1941. .

  • 2

    Van Langelaan EJ: A kinematic analysis of the tarsal joints: an x-ray photogrammetric study. .Acta Orthop Scand 54 (suppl 204).:1983. .

  • 3

    Benink RJ: The constraint mechanism of the human tarsus. .Acta Orthop Scand 56 (suppl 215).:1985. .

  • 4

    Lundberg A, Svensson OK, Bylund C, et al: Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex. Part 3: influence of leg rotation. .Foot Ankle 9::304. ,1989. .

  • 5

    Engsberg JR: Biomechanical analysis of the talocalcaneal joint: in vitro.. J Biomech 20::429. ,1987. .

  • 6

    Hintermann B, Nigg BM, Sommer C, et al: Transfer of movement between calcaneus and tibia in vitro.. Clin Biomech 9::349. ,1994. .

  • 7

    Downing BS, Klein BS, D’Amico JC: The axis of motion of the rearfoot complex. .JAPA 68::484. ,1978. .

  • 8

    Lundberg A, Svensson OK: The axes of rotation of the talocalcaneal and talonavicular joints. .Foot 3::65. ,1993. .

  • 9

    Panjabi MM, Goel VJ, Walter SD: Errors in kinematic parameters of a planar joint: guidelines for optimal experimental design. .J Biomech 15::537. ,1982. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Cunliffe M: Measurement, analysis and description of human arm motion [doctor of philosophy thesis]. Salford, England: University of Salford, 1997..

Kinematics of the Midtarsal Joint During Standing Leg Rotation

View More View Less
  • 1 Research Fellow, School of Health Care Professions, Brian Blatchford Bldg, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, United Kingdom.
  • | 2 Professor, Centre for Rehabilitation and Human Performance, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
  • | 3 Lecturer, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
Restricted access

Building on previous work that was cadaver based or involved invasive techniques, this study quantifies the kinematics of an approximation of the midtarsal joint with a noninvasive method. Three-dimensional kinematic data describing the motion of the forefoot and heel during transverse plane rotation of the leg were collected from 25 subjects by means of reflective markers and four infrared cameras. The motion between these segments was assumed to be the best possible clinical approximation of the midtarsal joint. The kinematic characteristics of the midtarsal joint were described in terms of the range and direction of motion in each cardinal body plane, the ratio of the range of motion in each plane, and the orientation of the axis of rotation. The characteristics of the midtarsal joint changed during the range of motion; thus, multiple axes of rotation could be calculated and joint characteristics were varied among subjects. The results of this in vivo method were generally consistent with those of cadaver studies and invasive in vivo studies. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 92(2): 77-81, 2002)

This study was funded by the Arthritis Research Campaign (United Kingdom).