Altman DG. (. 1980. ) Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample?British Medical Journal 281:(15 November):1336.-1338.
Altman DG. (. 1991. ) Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman Hall.
Bailar JC, Mosteller F. (. 1992. ) Medical uses of statistics. Massachusetts: New England Journal of Medicine.
Greenhalgh T. (. 1997. ) How to read a paper. Statistics for the non-statistician. I: Different types of data need different statistical tests.British Medical Journal 315(7104)::364.-6.
Greenhalgh T. (. 1997. ) How to read a paper. Statistics for the non-statistician. II: “Significant” relations and their pitfalls.British Medical Journal 315(7105)::422.-5.
Guyatt GH, Juniper EF, Walter SD, Griffith LE, Goldstein RS. (. 1998. ) Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials.British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)316(7132)::690.-3.
Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. (. 1993. ) Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.Journal of the American Medical Association 270(21)::2598.-601.
Kirkwood BR. (. 1988. ) Essentials of medical statistics. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
Knittel G, Staheli LT. (. 1976. ) The effectiveness of shoe modifications for intoeing.Orthopedic Clinics of North America 7(4)::1019.-25.
Lang TA, Secic M. (. 1997. ) How to report statistics in medicine. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians.
Machin D, Campbell MJ, Fayers PM, Pinol APY. (. 1997. ) Sample size tables for clinical studies. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
Pereira-Maxwell F. (. 1998. ) A-Z of medical statistics. London: Arnold.
Portney LG, Watkins MP. (. 1993. ) Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Stamford: Appleton and Lange.
Roland M, Torgerson D. (. 1998. ) Understanding controlled trials—What outcomes should be measured?British Medical Journal 317:(17 October):1075..
Spilker B. (. 1996. ) Guide to clinical trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
Understanding statistics can be one of the more difficult and daunting tasks facing the clinician attempting to understand and use the research literature. While the fundamental aim of including statistics in literature is to justify the conclusions and to enhance the information presented, all too often, statistics serve only to intimidate and alienate clinicians. There are two sources for this barrier to understanding: poor comprehension of statistics by clinicians, and inappropriate presentation of statistics by researchers. In the third of our papers on evidence-based practice and the clinician, some basic principles of statistics are introduced. Aspects such as the concepts of clinical and statistical significance are discussed, and an outline of the appropriate use of specific statistics is provided. The hope is that this will enable the clinician to better judge the applicability of statistical techniques as applied in the published literature. Some of the newer, more ‘clinician friendly’ statistical approaches are also presented. Finally some of the cheats and shortcuts commonly encountered in the presentation of research are discussed, and the methods for dealing with them are outlined. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 92(5): 297-305, 2002)