• 1

    Harris JC: Podiatric medical literature: progress, pitfalls and prognostications. .JAPMA 77::387. ,1987. .

  • 2

    Turlik MA, Kushner D: Levels of evidence of articles in podiatric medical journals. .JAPMA 90::300. ,2000. .

  • 3

    Wrobel J: Outcomes research in podiatric medicine. .JAPMA 90::403. ,2000. .

  • 4

    Staheli L: Planovalgus foot deformity: current status. .JAPMA 89::94. ,1999. .

  • 5

    Greenhalgh T: How to read a paper: articles that summarize other articles (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). .BMJ 315::672. ,1997. .

  • 6

    Mason J, O’Keeffe C, McIntosh A, et al: A systematic review of foot ulcer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: part I. .Prevention. Diabet Med 16::801. ,1999. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Mason J, O’Keeffe C, Hutchinson A, et al: A systematic review of foot ulcer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: part II. .Treatment. Diabet Med 16::889. ,1999. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    O’Meara S, Cullum N, Majid M, et al: Systematic reviews of wound care management: (3) antimicrobial agents for chronic wounds; (4) diabetic foot ulceration. .Health Technol Assess 4::1. ,2000. .

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Spencer S: Pressure relieving interventions for preventing and treating diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD002302, 2000..

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Jeffcoate W, Lima J, Nobrega L: The Charcot foot. .Diabet Med 17::253. ,2000. .

  • 11

    Crawford F, Atkins D, Edwards J: Interventions for treating plantar heel pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000416, 2000..

  • 12

    Hart R, Bell-Syer SE, Crawford F, et al: Systematic review of topical treatments for fungal infections of the skin and nails of the feet. .BMJ 319::79. ,1999. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Senapati A: The clinical section: a special case for case reports. .J R Soc Med 89::95. ,1996. .

  • 14

    Iles R, Piepho R: Presenting and publishing case reports. .J Clin Pharmacol 36::573. ,1996. .

  • 15

    Jansen C: Case reports and case studies: a discussion of theory and methodology in pocket format. .J Hand Ther 12::230. ,1999. .

  • 16

    McDermott MM, Lefevre F, Feinglass J, et al: Changes in study design, gender issues, and other characteristics of clinical research published in three major medical journals from 1971 to 1991. .J Gen Intern Med 10::13. ,1995. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Godlee F: Applying research evidence to individual patients [editorial]. .BMJ 316::1621. ,1998. .

  • 18

    Joseph W: Podiatric medial research [editorial]. .JAPMA 90::279. ,2000. .

  • 19

    Rothstein JM: Physical therapy research: academic inadequacies. .Phys Ther 72::92. ,1992. .

  • 20

    Menz HB: Publication patterns and perceptions of the Australian podiatric medical faculty. .JAPMA 91::210. ,2001. .

  • 21

    Menz HB: The first ten years of The Foot: a retrospective analysis of publication patterns, 1991–2000. .Foot 11::113. ,2001. .

A Retrospective Analysis of JAPMA Publication Patterns, 1991–2000

Hylton B. Menz BPod(Hons)1
View More View Less
  • 1 Lecturer, School of Exercise and Health Sciences, College of Social and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith DC, New South Wales 1797, Australia.
Restricted access

A retrospective analysis of 878 articles published in JAPMA from 1991 to 2000 was conducted to investigate changing patterns of publication activity in podiatric medicine. Most of the articles published in JAPMA were case reports (37%), followed by literature reviews (33%) and original research (30%). The Journal has covered a wide range of topic areas, with the most common being foot surgery (14%). A breakdown of the proportion of original research versus review articles and case reports for each topic area revealed that while orthotic therapy and biomechanics attract considerable attention from researchers, other important specialty areas such as foot surgery, dermatology, pediatrics, and rheumatology continue to be represented primarily by literature reviews and case reports. Two significant trends were observed: a gradual increase in the proportion of original research articles and a steady increase in the number of articles by authors outside the United States. These findings provide valuable insight into patterns of publication in podiatric medicine and raise a number of issues regarding the ongoing development of the profession. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 92(5): 308-313, 2002)